架构的物理验证性能和可扩展性

J. Ferguson, R. Todd
{"title":"架构的物理验证性能和可扩展性","authors":"J. Ferguson, R. Todd","doi":"10.1109/ISQED.2008.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary goal when using physical verification tools is to achieve the best performance at the lowest cost, both in resources and time. Physical verification tools rely on multiple enabling technologies to contribute to runtime and turnaround time reduction. Using differing combinations of architecture and scaling, this paper compares and contrasts three physical verification approaches to determine the combination of factors most likely to produce the desired results in a production environment.","PeriodicalId":243121,"journal":{"name":"9th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (isqed 2008)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Architecting for Physical Verification Performance and Scaling\",\"authors\":\"J. Ferguson, R. Todd\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISQED.2008.109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The primary goal when using physical verification tools is to achieve the best performance at the lowest cost, both in resources and time. Physical verification tools rely on multiple enabling technologies to contribute to runtime and turnaround time reduction. Using differing combinations of architecture and scaling, this paper compares and contrasts three physical verification approaches to determine the combination of factors most likely to produce the desired results in a production environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"9th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (isqed 2008)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"9th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (isqed 2008)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISQED.2008.109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"9th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (isqed 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISQED.2008.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用物理验证工具的主要目标是以最低的资源和时间成本获得最佳性能。物理验证工具依赖于多种启用技术来减少运行时和周转时间。本文使用不同的体系结构和可伸缩性组合,比较和对比了三种物理验证方法,以确定在生产环境中最有可能产生期望结果的因素组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Architecting for Physical Verification Performance and Scaling
The primary goal when using physical verification tools is to achieve the best performance at the lowest cost, both in resources and time. Physical verification tools rely on multiple enabling technologies to contribute to runtime and turnaround time reduction. Using differing combinations of architecture and scaling, this paper compares and contrasts three physical verification approaches to determine the combination of factors most likely to produce the desired results in a production environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信