故障感应电动机的型号比较:性能和应用

J. Sprooten, J. Gyselinck, J. Maun
{"title":"故障感应电动机的型号比较:性能和应用","authors":"J. Sprooten, J. Gyselinck, J. Maun","doi":"10.1109/DEMPED.2007.4393083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a comparison of several circuit models of induction motors with broken bars in terms of representation of the phenomena, identifiability of its parameters as well as computing time. Such a comparison is rare as many papers focus on the presentation of new models. The three models studied in this paper are based on electrical circuit equations obtained using a common set of hypotheses which is important to reach the objectives. The different models are totally equivalent in healthy operations. A d-q stator transformation is used for the implementation of Model 1, a asymmetrical d-q rotor transformation is then added in the case of Model 2 and the application of the theorem of superposition leads to Model 3. Model 1 gives quite accurate results but requires extensive computing time and a precise knowledge of the rotor parameters. Equivalent performances are obtained with Model 2 but with a much lower computing time. The drawback is that the value of the d and q rotor resistances and inductances need to be numerically computed as they are functions of the slip. Finally Model 3 reaches less accurate results for high fault magnitude but in a low computing time and with few parameter knowledge as well as a good interpretation of the faulty machine behaviour. The three presented models cover then the complete range of applications, i.e. from the faulty machine test platform to the on-line diagnosis of machines.","PeriodicalId":185737,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electric Machines, Power Electronics and Drives","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of models of faulty induction motors: Performances and applications\",\"authors\":\"J. Sprooten, J. Gyselinck, J. Maun\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DEMPED.2007.4393083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes a comparison of several circuit models of induction motors with broken bars in terms of representation of the phenomena, identifiability of its parameters as well as computing time. Such a comparison is rare as many papers focus on the presentation of new models. The three models studied in this paper are based on electrical circuit equations obtained using a common set of hypotheses which is important to reach the objectives. The different models are totally equivalent in healthy operations. A d-q stator transformation is used for the implementation of Model 1, a asymmetrical d-q rotor transformation is then added in the case of Model 2 and the application of the theorem of superposition leads to Model 3. Model 1 gives quite accurate results but requires extensive computing time and a precise knowledge of the rotor parameters. Equivalent performances are obtained with Model 2 but with a much lower computing time. The drawback is that the value of the d and q rotor resistances and inductances need to be numerically computed as they are functions of the slip. Finally Model 3 reaches less accurate results for high fault magnitude but in a low computing time and with few parameter knowledge as well as a good interpretation of the faulty machine behaviour. The three presented models cover then the complete range of applications, i.e. from the faulty machine test platform to the on-line diagnosis of machines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electric Machines, Power Electronics and Drives\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electric Machines, Power Electronics and Drives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DEMPED.2007.4393083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electric Machines, Power Electronics and Drives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DEMPED.2007.4393083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文从断条现象的表征、断条参数的可辨识性和计算时间等方面对几种异步电动机断条电路模型进行了比较。这样的比较是罕见的,因为许多论文关注的是新模型的呈现。本文所研究的三个模型都是基于一组共同的假设得到的电路方程,这对达到目标很重要。不同的模型在正常运行中是完全等效的。模型1采用d-q定子变换实现,模型2采用不对称d-q转子变换实现,应用叠加定理得到模型3。模型1给出了相当准确的结果,但需要大量的计算时间和转子参数的精确知识。模型2的性能相当,但计算时间要短得多。缺点是d和q转子电阻和电感的值需要数值计算,因为它们是转差的函数。最后,模型3在高故障幅度下得到的结果不太准确,但计算时间短,参数知识少,对故障机器行为的解释也很好。提出的三种模型涵盖了整个应用范围,即从故障机器测试平台到机器在线诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of models of faulty induction motors: Performances and applications
This paper proposes a comparison of several circuit models of induction motors with broken bars in terms of representation of the phenomena, identifiability of its parameters as well as computing time. Such a comparison is rare as many papers focus on the presentation of new models. The three models studied in this paper are based on electrical circuit equations obtained using a common set of hypotheses which is important to reach the objectives. The different models are totally equivalent in healthy operations. A d-q stator transformation is used for the implementation of Model 1, a asymmetrical d-q rotor transformation is then added in the case of Model 2 and the application of the theorem of superposition leads to Model 3. Model 1 gives quite accurate results but requires extensive computing time and a precise knowledge of the rotor parameters. Equivalent performances are obtained with Model 2 but with a much lower computing time. The drawback is that the value of the d and q rotor resistances and inductances need to be numerically computed as they are functions of the slip. Finally Model 3 reaches less accurate results for high fault magnitude but in a low computing time and with few parameter knowledge as well as a good interpretation of the faulty machine behaviour. The three presented models cover then the complete range of applications, i.e. from the faulty machine test platform to the on-line diagnosis of machines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信