斯里兰卡水稻的自然抗性研究广谱除草剂品种(草甘膦和草铵膦)

S. Weerakoon, S. Somaratne, E. M. S. I.Ekanayaka, Sachithri Munasighe
{"title":"斯里兰卡水稻的自然抗性研究广谱除草剂品种(草甘膦和草铵膦)","authors":"S. Weerakoon, S. Somaratne, E. M. S. I.Ekanayaka, Sachithri Munasighe","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.76991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since studies on herbicide-resistant rice (HRR) are limited in Sri Lanka, the present study conducted to screen the naturally existing glyphosate and glufosinate resistance in traditional and inbred rice varieties. Six traditional varieties and nineteen inbred lines were selected for the study. Complete randomized design with three pots with 10 replicates for each herbicide concentration was employed. Optimal concentrations of glyphosate (0.5 gl −1 ) and glufosinate (0.05 gl −1 ) were applied at 3–4 leaf stages. Varieties ≥50% survival percentage was considered as resistant to respective herbicides. Twelve varieties showed resistance (≥50%) at 0.5 gl −1 glyphosate concentration. Survived plants were monitored and agro-morphological and yield characters/parameters were mea- sured. Fifteen varieties were to glufosinate at 0.05 gl −1 . Even though no significant differ ences (p > 0.05) were observed in growth parameters across control and treated plants, there was a yield penalty. Nine varieties (At362, Bg352, Bg359, Bg366, Bg369, Bg379-2, Bg403, Bg454, and Pachchaperumal) indicated moderate resistance to both glyphosate and glufosinate. The emerged HRRs indicated varying responses of agro-morphological and yield characters across the type of herbicide and the variety. Glyphosate reduced the growth parameters and yield penalty compared to glufosinate treated varieties. These HRR varieties have a higher potential in rice breeding programs and in develop ing HR rice varieties in future. Bg305—1%) lethal 0.05 gl −1 glufosinate 0.5 gl glyphosate. rice varieties Bg250—83%, Bg300—96%, Bg352— 100%, Bg357—53%, Bg359—100%, Bg360—96%, Bg366—73%, Bg369—83%, Bg379/2—93%, Bg403—100%, Bg450—57%, Bg454—97%, Bg94/1—73%, Pachchaperumal —53%) showed natural resistance under glufosinate application and 12 rice varieties (At362—75%, Bg352— 50%, Bg359—55%, Bg366—65%, Bg369—60%, Bg379/2—65%, Bg403—60%, Bg454—55%, Ld365—70%, Kaluheenati —55%, Kuruluthuda —55%, Pachchaperumal —70%) were able to sur vive under glyphosate application. Results indicated that nine varieties (At362, Bg352, Bg359, Bg366, Bg369, Bg379-2, Bg403, Bg454 and Pachchaperumal were resistant for both glyphosate and glufosinate","PeriodicalId":433846,"journal":{"name":"Rice Crop - Current Developments","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural Resistance of Sri Lankan Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Varieties to Broad-Spectrum Herbicides (Glyphosate and Glufosinate)\",\"authors\":\"S. Weerakoon, S. Somaratne, E. M. S. I.Ekanayaka, Sachithri Munasighe\",\"doi\":\"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.76991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since studies on herbicide-resistant rice (HRR) are limited in Sri Lanka, the present study conducted to screen the naturally existing glyphosate and glufosinate resistance in traditional and inbred rice varieties. Six traditional varieties and nineteen inbred lines were selected for the study. Complete randomized design with three pots with 10 replicates for each herbicide concentration was employed. Optimal concentrations of glyphosate (0.5 gl −1 ) and glufosinate (0.05 gl −1 ) were applied at 3–4 leaf stages. Varieties ≥50% survival percentage was considered as resistant to respective herbicides. Twelve varieties showed resistance (≥50%) at 0.5 gl −1 glyphosate concentration. Survived plants were monitored and agro-morphological and yield characters/parameters were mea- sured. Fifteen varieties were to glufosinate at 0.05 gl −1 . Even though no significant differ ences (p > 0.05) were observed in growth parameters across control and treated plants, there was a yield penalty. Nine varieties (At362, Bg352, Bg359, Bg366, Bg369, Bg379-2, Bg403, Bg454, and Pachchaperumal) indicated moderate resistance to both glyphosate and glufosinate. The emerged HRRs indicated varying responses of agro-morphological and yield characters across the type of herbicide and the variety. Glyphosate reduced the growth parameters and yield penalty compared to glufosinate treated varieties. These HRR varieties have a higher potential in rice breeding programs and in develop ing HR rice varieties in future. Bg305—1%) lethal 0.05 gl −1 glufosinate 0.5 gl glyphosate. rice varieties Bg250—83%, Bg300—96%, Bg352— 100%, Bg357—53%, Bg359—100%, Bg360—96%, Bg366—73%, Bg369—83%, Bg379/2—93%, Bg403—100%, Bg450—57%, Bg454—97%, Bg94/1—73%, Pachchaperumal —53%) showed natural resistance under glufosinate application and 12 rice varieties (At362—75%, Bg352— 50%, Bg359—55%, Bg366—65%, Bg369—60%, Bg379/2—65%, Bg403—60%, Bg454—55%, Ld365—70%, Kaluheenati —55%, Kuruluthuda —55%, Pachchaperumal —70%) were able to sur vive under glyphosate application. Results indicated that nine varieties (At362, Bg352, Bg359, Bg366, Bg369, Bg379-2, Bg403, Bg454 and Pachchaperumal were resistant for both glyphosate and glufosinate\",\"PeriodicalId\":433846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rice Crop - Current Developments\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rice Crop - Current Developments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.76991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rice Crop - Current Developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.76991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于斯里兰卡对抗除草剂水稻(HRR)的研究有限,本研究旨在筛选传统和自交系水稻品种中天然存在的草甘膦和草铵膦抗性。选择6个传统品种和19个自交系进行研究。采用完全随机设计,3个盆栽,每个除草剂浓度10个重复。草甘膦(0.5 gl−1)和草铵膦(0.05 gl−1)的最佳浓度在3-4叶期施用。成活率≥50%的品种被认为对相应除草剂具有抗性。12个品种在0.5 gl−1草甘膦浓度下表现出抗性(≥50%)。对成活植株进行监测,测定其农业形态和产量性状参数。15个品种施用0.05 gl−1的草铵膦。尽管对照和处理植株的生长参数无显著差异(p < 0.05),但存在产量损失。9个品种(At362、Bg352、Bg359、Bg366、Bg369、Bg379-2、Bg403、Bg454和Pachchaperumal)对草甘膦和草铵膦均表现出中等抗性。出现的hrr表明不同类型除草剂和品种对农业形态和产量性状的响应不同。与草甘膦处理的品种相比,草甘膦降低了生长参数和产量损失。这些高致病性水稻品种在水稻育种计划和未来高致病性水稻品种开发中具有较大的潜力。致死0.05 gl - 1草甘膦0.5 gl草甘膦。Bg250-83%、Bg300-96%、Bg352 - 100%、Bg357-53%、Bg359-100%、Bg360-96%、Bg366-73%、Bg369-83%、Bg379/2-93%、Bg403-100%、Bg450-57%、Bg454-97%、Bg94/1-73%、Pachchaperumal - 53%等12个水稻品种(At362-75%、Bg352 - 50%、Bg359-55%、Bg366-65%、Bg369-60%、bg379 - 65%、Bg454-55%、Ld365-70%、Kaluheenati - 55%、Kuruluthuda - 55%、Pachchaperumal - 70%)在草甘磷处理下表现出自然抗性。结果表明,9个品种(At362、Bg352、Bg359、Bg366、Bg369、Bg379-2、Bg403、Bg454和Pachchaperumal)对草甘膦和草铵膦均具有抗性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Natural Resistance of Sri Lankan Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Varieties to Broad-Spectrum Herbicides (Glyphosate and Glufosinate)
Since studies on herbicide-resistant rice (HRR) are limited in Sri Lanka, the present study conducted to screen the naturally existing glyphosate and glufosinate resistance in traditional and inbred rice varieties. Six traditional varieties and nineteen inbred lines were selected for the study. Complete randomized design with three pots with 10 replicates for each herbicide concentration was employed. Optimal concentrations of glyphosate (0.5 gl −1 ) and glufosinate (0.05 gl −1 ) were applied at 3–4 leaf stages. Varieties ≥50% survival percentage was considered as resistant to respective herbicides. Twelve varieties showed resistance (≥50%) at 0.5 gl −1 glyphosate concentration. Survived plants were monitored and agro-morphological and yield characters/parameters were mea- sured. Fifteen varieties were to glufosinate at 0.05 gl −1 . Even though no significant differ ences (p > 0.05) were observed in growth parameters across control and treated plants, there was a yield penalty. Nine varieties (At362, Bg352, Bg359, Bg366, Bg369, Bg379-2, Bg403, Bg454, and Pachchaperumal) indicated moderate resistance to both glyphosate and glufosinate. The emerged HRRs indicated varying responses of agro-morphological and yield characters across the type of herbicide and the variety. Glyphosate reduced the growth parameters and yield penalty compared to glufosinate treated varieties. These HRR varieties have a higher potential in rice breeding programs and in develop ing HR rice varieties in future. Bg305—1%) lethal 0.05 gl −1 glufosinate 0.5 gl glyphosate. rice varieties Bg250—83%, Bg300—96%, Bg352— 100%, Bg357—53%, Bg359—100%, Bg360—96%, Bg366—73%, Bg369—83%, Bg379/2—93%, Bg403—100%, Bg450—57%, Bg454—97%, Bg94/1—73%, Pachchaperumal —53%) showed natural resistance under glufosinate application and 12 rice varieties (At362—75%, Bg352— 50%, Bg359—55%, Bg366—65%, Bg369—60%, Bg379/2—65%, Bg403—60%, Bg454—55%, Ld365—70%, Kaluheenati —55%, Kuruluthuda —55%, Pachchaperumal —70%) were able to sur vive under glyphosate application. Results indicated that nine varieties (At362, Bg352, Bg359, Bg366, Bg369, Bg379-2, Bg403, Bg454 and Pachchaperumal were resistant for both glyphosate and glufosinate
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信