Emily Hallgren, L. Carnahan, Kristine Zimmermann, Y. Molina
{"title":"C22:农村癌症幸存者的经济负担、就业和健康状况","authors":"Emily Hallgren, L. Carnahan, Kristine Zimmermann, Y. Molina","doi":"10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-C22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: A growing body of literature has begun to document rural-urban disparities among cancer survivors. Rural survivors report worse mental health, health behaviors (e.g., smoking, physical activity), and self-rated health relative to urban counterparts. There is a need to determine modifiable determinants of these disparities, including work. Only one study of which we are aware has explored financial determinants of health: Weaver and colleagues found rural survivors were more likely to report not being able to work because of health-related reasons than urban counterparts. Little, however, is known about cancer-related financial burden during (e.g., filing for bankruptcy) and after treatment (e.g., not returning to work). Objective: This study seeks to: 1) characterize cancer-related financial burden and employment among rural survivors and 2) examine how these factors pertain to their self-rated health. Methods: We drew from an ongoing larger study that is characterizing the health needs of 600 rural cancer survivors and caregivers of cancer patients throughout Illinois State. Participants were recruited via non-probability based sampling methods, including physical flyers placed in rural community organizations (e.g., churches, hair salons, support groups), public health departments, clinics, hospitals, and cancer centers as well as at cancer-related events (e.g., Relay for Life); word of mouth; and electronic flyers distributed via websites, listservs, and social media. Interested participants contacted staff via the study website or phone number. To be eligible for the study, individuals self-reported: 1) being 18 years or older, 2) identifying as a survivor and/or caregiver, and 3) living in a rural part of Illinois State. After screening and providing informed consent, participants completed surveys by mail, phone, or website. Participants received $15 for their time and effort. Results: Since February, we have recruited 72 current survivors, 84% of whom completed the survey online and 27% of whom also self-reported having been caregivers of cancer patients during their lifetime. Our sample was largely female, married, and non-Latino White (NLW). Survivors in the sample are well-educated overall, with 52% holding a bachelor9s degree or above. The median annual household income (AHI) was $50,001 to $75,000, with 40% reporting an AHI of more than $75,000. Approximately 26% of respondents indicated cancer-related financial burden. With regard to work, 52% indicated cancer-related work stoppage, 18% indicated they did not return to work, and 40% indicated a reduced workload during treatment. Cancer-related financial burden was associated with family income, in that work stoppage was associated with lower annual household income (B = -0.32, 95% CI [-0.14, -1.35], p = .02). Finally, we examined how cancer-related financial burdens and employment factors were associated with rural residents9 self-rated health. Cancer-related employment factors were associated with self-rated health, in that returning to work at a different job (as opposed to the same job) was associated with lower self-rated health (B = -.49, 95% CI [-.34, -.06], p = .008). Discussion: Our study suggests that work may be an important determinant of rural-urban disparities among cancer survivors. Specifically, financial burden and work difficulties were fairly prevalent among our sample. Returning to work at a different job was significantly associated with lower self-rated health. Limitations include small sample size, generalizability, and an inability to make causal inferences. Our next steps will be to further explore how these work-related factors pertain to specific health behaviors, mental health, and physical health outcomes among survivors and caregivers. Citation Format: Emily Hallgren, Leslie R. Carnahan, Kristine Zimmermann, Yamile Molina. Cancer-related financial burden, employment, and health among rural cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr C22.","PeriodicalId":254061,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Social Science","volume":"285 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract C22: Cancer-related financial burden, employment, and health among rural cancer survivors\",\"authors\":\"Emily Hallgren, L. Carnahan, Kristine Zimmermann, Y. Molina\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-C22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: A growing body of literature has begun to document rural-urban disparities among cancer survivors. Rural survivors report worse mental health, health behaviors (e.g., smoking, physical activity), and self-rated health relative to urban counterparts. There is a need to determine modifiable determinants of these disparities, including work. Only one study of which we are aware has explored financial determinants of health: Weaver and colleagues found rural survivors were more likely to report not being able to work because of health-related reasons than urban counterparts. Little, however, is known about cancer-related financial burden during (e.g., filing for bankruptcy) and after treatment (e.g., not returning to work). Objective: This study seeks to: 1) characterize cancer-related financial burden and employment among rural survivors and 2) examine how these factors pertain to their self-rated health. Methods: We drew from an ongoing larger study that is characterizing the health needs of 600 rural cancer survivors and caregivers of cancer patients throughout Illinois State. Participants were recruited via non-probability based sampling methods, including physical flyers placed in rural community organizations (e.g., churches, hair salons, support groups), public health departments, clinics, hospitals, and cancer centers as well as at cancer-related events (e.g., Relay for Life); word of mouth; and electronic flyers distributed via websites, listservs, and social media. Interested participants contacted staff via the study website or phone number. To be eligible for the study, individuals self-reported: 1) being 18 years or older, 2) identifying as a survivor and/or caregiver, and 3) living in a rural part of Illinois State. After screening and providing informed consent, participants completed surveys by mail, phone, or website. Participants received $15 for their time and effort. Results: Since February, we have recruited 72 current survivors, 84% of whom completed the survey online and 27% of whom also self-reported having been caregivers of cancer patients during their lifetime. Our sample was largely female, married, and non-Latino White (NLW). Survivors in the sample are well-educated overall, with 52% holding a bachelor9s degree or above. The median annual household income (AHI) was $50,001 to $75,000, with 40% reporting an AHI of more than $75,000. Approximately 26% of respondents indicated cancer-related financial burden. With regard to work, 52% indicated cancer-related work stoppage, 18% indicated they did not return to work, and 40% indicated a reduced workload during treatment. Cancer-related financial burden was associated with family income, in that work stoppage was associated with lower annual household income (B = -0.32, 95% CI [-0.14, -1.35], p = .02). Finally, we examined how cancer-related financial burdens and employment factors were associated with rural residents9 self-rated health. Cancer-related employment factors were associated with self-rated health, in that returning to work at a different job (as opposed to the same job) was associated with lower self-rated health (B = -.49, 95% CI [-.34, -.06], p = .008). Discussion: Our study suggests that work may be an important determinant of rural-urban disparities among cancer survivors. Specifically, financial burden and work difficulties were fairly prevalent among our sample. Returning to work at a different job was significantly associated with lower self-rated health. Limitations include small sample size, generalizability, and an inability to make causal inferences. Our next steps will be to further explore how these work-related factors pertain to specific health behaviors, mental health, and physical health outcomes among survivors and caregivers. Citation Format: Emily Hallgren, Leslie R. Carnahan, Kristine Zimmermann, Yamile Molina. Cancer-related financial burden, employment, and health among rural cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr C22.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral and Social Science\",\"volume\":\"285 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral and Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-C22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-C22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:越来越多的文献已经开始记录城乡癌症幸存者之间的差异。据报告,与城市幸存者相比,农村幸存者的精神健康、健康行为(如吸烟、体育活动)和自评健康状况更差。有必要确定这些差异的可改变的决定因素,包括工作。据我们所知,只有一项研究探讨了健康的经济决定因素:韦弗和他的同事发现,与城市的幸存者相比,农村幸存者更有可能因为健康原因而无法工作。然而,在癌症期间(例如,申请破产)和治疗后(例如,不返回工作岗位),人们对癌症相关的经济负担知之甚少。目的:本研究旨在:1)表征农村幸存者癌症相关的经济负担和就业;2)研究这些因素与他们自评健康的关系。方法:我们从一项正在进行的更大的研究中得出结论,该研究描述了伊利诺伊州600名农村癌症幸存者和癌症患者护理人员的健康需求。通过非概率抽样方法招募参与者,包括在农村社区组织(如教堂、发廊、支持团体)、公共卫生部门、诊所、医院和癌症中心以及癌症相关活动(如“生命接力”)中放置实物传单;口口相传;以及通过网站、listservs和社交媒体分发的电子传单。感兴趣的参与者通过研究网站或电话号码与工作人员联系。为了有资格参加这项研究,个人自我报告:1)18岁或以上,2)确定为幸存者和/或照顾者,3)居住在伊利诺伊州的农村地区。在筛选并提供知情同意后,参与者通过邮件、电话或网站完成调查。参与者的时间和精力得到了15美元。结果:自今年2月以来,我们招募了72名癌症幸存者,其中84%的人在网上完成了调查,27%的人也自我报告在他们的一生中照顾过癌症患者。我们的样本主要是女性,已婚,非拉丁裔白人(NLW)。样本中的幸存者总体上受过良好的教育,52%的人拥有学士或以上学位。家庭年收入中位数(AHI)为50,001美元至75,000美元,其中40%的家庭年收入超过75,000美元。约26%的受访者表示有癌症相关的经济负担。在工作方面,52%的人表示与癌症有关的停工,18%的人表示他们没有返回工作岗位,40%的人表示在治疗期间工作量减少。癌症相关的经济负担与家庭收入相关,其中停工与较低的家庭年收入相关(B = -0.32, 95% CI [-0.14, -1.35], p = 0.02)。最后,我们研究了与癌症相关的经济负担和就业因素与农村居民自评健康之间的关系。与癌症相关的就业因素与自我评价的健康有关,因为回到不同的工作岗位(而不是同一份工作)与较低的自我评价健康有关(B = -)。49, 95% ci[-]。34岁的-。[06], p = .008)。讨论:我们的研究表明,工作可能是城乡癌症幸存者差异的重要决定因素。具体来说,经济负担和工作困难在我们的样本中相当普遍。回到不同的工作岗位与较低的自我健康评价显著相关。局限性包括样本量小、普遍性和无法进行因果推论。我们的下一步将是进一步探索这些与工作相关的因素如何与幸存者和照顾者的特定健康行为、心理健康和身体健康结果相关联。引文格式:Emily Hallgren, Leslie R. Carnahan, Kristine Zimmermann, Yamile Molina。农村癌症幸存者的癌症相关经济负担、就业和健康[摘要]见:第十届AACR会议论文集:种族/少数民族和医疗服务不足人群的癌症健康差异科学;2017年9月25-28日;亚特兰大,乔治亚州。费城(PA): AACR;癌症流行病学杂志,2018;27(7增刊):摘要nr C22。
Abstract C22: Cancer-related financial burden, employment, and health among rural cancer survivors
Purpose: A growing body of literature has begun to document rural-urban disparities among cancer survivors. Rural survivors report worse mental health, health behaviors (e.g., smoking, physical activity), and self-rated health relative to urban counterparts. There is a need to determine modifiable determinants of these disparities, including work. Only one study of which we are aware has explored financial determinants of health: Weaver and colleagues found rural survivors were more likely to report not being able to work because of health-related reasons than urban counterparts. Little, however, is known about cancer-related financial burden during (e.g., filing for bankruptcy) and after treatment (e.g., not returning to work). Objective: This study seeks to: 1) characterize cancer-related financial burden and employment among rural survivors and 2) examine how these factors pertain to their self-rated health. Methods: We drew from an ongoing larger study that is characterizing the health needs of 600 rural cancer survivors and caregivers of cancer patients throughout Illinois State. Participants were recruited via non-probability based sampling methods, including physical flyers placed in rural community organizations (e.g., churches, hair salons, support groups), public health departments, clinics, hospitals, and cancer centers as well as at cancer-related events (e.g., Relay for Life); word of mouth; and electronic flyers distributed via websites, listservs, and social media. Interested participants contacted staff via the study website or phone number. To be eligible for the study, individuals self-reported: 1) being 18 years or older, 2) identifying as a survivor and/or caregiver, and 3) living in a rural part of Illinois State. After screening and providing informed consent, participants completed surveys by mail, phone, or website. Participants received $15 for their time and effort. Results: Since February, we have recruited 72 current survivors, 84% of whom completed the survey online and 27% of whom also self-reported having been caregivers of cancer patients during their lifetime. Our sample was largely female, married, and non-Latino White (NLW). Survivors in the sample are well-educated overall, with 52% holding a bachelor9s degree or above. The median annual household income (AHI) was $50,001 to $75,000, with 40% reporting an AHI of more than $75,000. Approximately 26% of respondents indicated cancer-related financial burden. With regard to work, 52% indicated cancer-related work stoppage, 18% indicated they did not return to work, and 40% indicated a reduced workload during treatment. Cancer-related financial burden was associated with family income, in that work stoppage was associated with lower annual household income (B = -0.32, 95% CI [-0.14, -1.35], p = .02). Finally, we examined how cancer-related financial burdens and employment factors were associated with rural residents9 self-rated health. Cancer-related employment factors were associated with self-rated health, in that returning to work at a different job (as opposed to the same job) was associated with lower self-rated health (B = -.49, 95% CI [-.34, -.06], p = .008). Discussion: Our study suggests that work may be an important determinant of rural-urban disparities among cancer survivors. Specifically, financial burden and work difficulties were fairly prevalent among our sample. Returning to work at a different job was significantly associated with lower self-rated health. Limitations include small sample size, generalizability, and an inability to make causal inferences. Our next steps will be to further explore how these work-related factors pertain to specific health behaviors, mental health, and physical health outcomes among survivors and caregivers. Citation Format: Emily Hallgren, Leslie R. Carnahan, Kristine Zimmermann, Yamile Molina. Cancer-related financial burden, employment, and health among rural cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr C22.