独自“划龙船”?社区关系与系统性收入冲击

Konstantinos Matakos, D. Minos, Ari A. Perdana, E. Radin
{"title":"独自“划龙船”?社区关系与系统性收入冲击","authors":"Konstantinos Matakos, D. Minos, Ari A. Perdana, E. Radin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3292917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Can social capital effectively cushion households against adverse income shocks, especially in the absence of formal insurance mechanisms in developing countries? We analyze whether participation in formal and informal community activities (our measure of social capital) helped households in Indonesia mitigating the impact of the 1998 economic crisis. We use the 1997 and 2000 rounds of the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) to capture the impact of the crisis on household welfare and assess the potency of social capital as a safety net. In contrast to previous studies, our empirical results do not lend support to this hypothesis. Using an IV strategy, we find community participation not to be statistically significant in explaining changes in household expenditure. The large magnitude and universal nature of the shock might explain why social capital did not help households. However, we find some evidence that households who participated in such activities are more likely to have received financial assistance from local authorities without necessarily being the neediest ones.","PeriodicalId":283702,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Financial Crises (Monetary) (Topic)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Dragon Boating' Alone? Community Ties and Systemic Income Shocks\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Matakos, D. Minos, Ari A. Perdana, E. Radin\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3292917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Can social capital effectively cushion households against adverse income shocks, especially in the absence of formal insurance mechanisms in developing countries? We analyze whether participation in formal and informal community activities (our measure of social capital) helped households in Indonesia mitigating the impact of the 1998 economic crisis. We use the 1997 and 2000 rounds of the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) to capture the impact of the crisis on household welfare and assess the potency of social capital as a safety net. In contrast to previous studies, our empirical results do not lend support to this hypothesis. Using an IV strategy, we find community participation not to be statistically significant in explaining changes in household expenditure. The large magnitude and universal nature of the shock might explain why social capital did not help households. However, we find some evidence that households who participated in such activities are more likely to have received financial assistance from local authorities without necessarily being the neediest ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":283702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Financial Crises (Monetary) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Financial Crises (Monetary) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3292917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Financial Crises (Monetary) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3292917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会资本能否有效缓冲家庭对不利收入冲击的冲击,特别是在发展中国家缺乏正式保险机制的情况下?我们分析了参与正式和非正式社区活动(我们的社会资本衡量标准)是否帮助印尼家庭减轻了1998年经济危机的影响。我们使用1997年和2000年的印度尼西亚家庭生活调查(IFLS)来捕捉危机对家庭福利的影响,并评估社会资本作为安全网的效力。与以往的研究相反,我们的实证结果并不支持这一假设。使用IV策略,我们发现社区参与在解释家庭支出变化方面没有统计学意义。这次冲击的规模之大、性质之普遍,或许可以解释为什么社会资本没有帮助家庭。然而,我们发现一些证据表明,参与此类活动的家庭更有可能从地方当局获得经济援助,而不一定是最需要的家庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Dragon Boating' Alone? Community Ties and Systemic Income Shocks
Can social capital effectively cushion households against adverse income shocks, especially in the absence of formal insurance mechanisms in developing countries? We analyze whether participation in formal and informal community activities (our measure of social capital) helped households in Indonesia mitigating the impact of the 1998 economic crisis. We use the 1997 and 2000 rounds of the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) to capture the impact of the crisis on household welfare and assess the potency of social capital as a safety net. In contrast to previous studies, our empirical results do not lend support to this hypothesis. Using an IV strategy, we find community participation not to be statistically significant in explaining changes in household expenditure. The large magnitude and universal nature of the shock might explain why social capital did not help households. However, we find some evidence that households who participated in such activities are more likely to have received financial assistance from local authorities without necessarily being the neediest ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信