基于模型的模式匹配

Lithography Asia Pub Date : 2008-12-04 DOI:10.1117/12.810062
L. Melvin, Josh Tuttle, Mathias Boman
{"title":"基于模型的模式匹配","authors":"L. Melvin, Josh Tuttle, Mathias Boman","doi":"10.1117/12.810062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important need in the Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) process is to be able to identify problem correction areas. However, many times when a problem correction area is identified, multiple instances of the same problem occur throughout the correction. This can lead to potentially hundreds or thousands of repeated structures that must be filtered by the development engineer. In some instances, hundreds of thousands of problem areas may be identified, but in reality, all the areas are the same lithographic pattern. One way of identifying repeated patterns in an analysis data base is to use Boolean geometric logic to isolate matching patterns. The problem with this approach is determining what area is the area of process influence. This invariably leads to a conservative analysis of similar patterns, which leads to many repeated failures that are actually the same failure. This study will discuss a solution to this problem using process models and process model approximations to determine if patterns are the same from the point of view of the process. This will be accomplished using the output model intensity, the output model slope, and the pattern response to focus variation. When these three values are the same, it is hypothesized the layout patterns are the same from a process point of view. In addition, the study will discuss methodologies to speed up the model analysis and adjust accuracy and sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":383504,"journal":{"name":"Lithography Asia","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model based pattern matching\",\"authors\":\"L. Melvin, Josh Tuttle, Mathias Boman\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.810062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An important need in the Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) process is to be able to identify problem correction areas. However, many times when a problem correction area is identified, multiple instances of the same problem occur throughout the correction. This can lead to potentially hundreds or thousands of repeated structures that must be filtered by the development engineer. In some instances, hundreds of thousands of problem areas may be identified, but in reality, all the areas are the same lithographic pattern. One way of identifying repeated patterns in an analysis data base is to use Boolean geometric logic to isolate matching patterns. The problem with this approach is determining what area is the area of process influence. This invariably leads to a conservative analysis of similar patterns, which leads to many repeated failures that are actually the same failure. This study will discuss a solution to this problem using process models and process model approximations to determine if patterns are the same from the point of view of the process. This will be accomplished using the output model intensity, the output model slope, and the pattern response to focus variation. When these three values are the same, it is hypothesized the layout patterns are the same from a process point of view. In addition, the study will discuss methodologies to speed up the model analysis and adjust accuracy and sensitivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lithography Asia\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lithography Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.810062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithography Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.810062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

光学接近校正(OPC)过程中的一个重要需求是能够识别问题校正区域。然而,很多时候,当确定一个问题纠正区域时,在整个纠正过程中会出现相同问题的多个实例。这可能导致数百或数千个必须由开发工程师过滤的重复结构。在某些情况下,可能会识别出数十万个问题区域,但实际上,所有区域都是相同的光刻模式。在分析数据库中识别重复模式的一种方法是使用布尔几何逻辑来隔离匹配模式。这种方法的问题在于确定哪个区域是过程影响的区域。这必然导致对相似模式的保守分析,从而导致许多实际上是相同失败的重复失败。本研究将讨论使用流程模型和流程模型近似来确定模式从流程的角度是否相同的解决方案。这将通过使用输出模型强度、输出模型斜率和模式对焦点变化的响应来完成。当这三个值相同时,假设从流程的角度来看布局模式是相同的。此外,研究还将讨论加快模型分析和调整精度和灵敏度的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model based pattern matching
An important need in the Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) process is to be able to identify problem correction areas. However, many times when a problem correction area is identified, multiple instances of the same problem occur throughout the correction. This can lead to potentially hundreds or thousands of repeated structures that must be filtered by the development engineer. In some instances, hundreds of thousands of problem areas may be identified, but in reality, all the areas are the same lithographic pattern. One way of identifying repeated patterns in an analysis data base is to use Boolean geometric logic to isolate matching patterns. The problem with this approach is determining what area is the area of process influence. This invariably leads to a conservative analysis of similar patterns, which leads to many repeated failures that are actually the same failure. This study will discuss a solution to this problem using process models and process model approximations to determine if patterns are the same from the point of view of the process. This will be accomplished using the output model intensity, the output model slope, and the pattern response to focus variation. When these three values are the same, it is hypothesized the layout patterns are the same from a process point of view. In addition, the study will discuss methodologies to speed up the model analysis and adjust accuracy and sensitivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信