具有统一多结论规则的演绎系统

A. Citkin
{"title":"具有统一多结论规则的演绎系统","authors":"A. Citkin","doi":"10.21146/2074-1472-2020-26-2-87-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our goal is to develop a syntactical apparatus for propositional logics in which the accepted and rejected propositions have the same status and are being treated in the same way. The suggested approach is based on the ideas of Ƚukasiewicz used for the classical logic and in addition, it includes the use of multiple conclusion rules. A special attention is paid to the logics in which each proposition is either accepted or rejected.","PeriodicalId":155189,"journal":{"name":"Logical Investigations","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deductive systems with unified multiple-conclusion rules\",\"authors\":\"A. Citkin\",\"doi\":\"10.21146/2074-1472-2020-26-2-87-105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our goal is to develop a syntactical apparatus for propositional logics in which the accepted and rejected propositions have the same status and are being treated in the same way. The suggested approach is based on the ideas of Ƚukasiewicz used for the classical logic and in addition, it includes the use of multiple conclusion rules. A special attention is paid to the logics in which each proposition is either accepted or rejected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":155189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Logical Investigations\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Logical Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-1472-2020-26-2-87-105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logical Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-1472-2020-26-2-87-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目标是开发一种命题逻辑的句法工具,其中被接受和被拒绝的命题具有相同的地位,并以相同的方式被处理。建议的方法基于用于经典逻辑的Ƚukasiewicz的思想,此外,它还包括使用多个结论规则。我们特别注意每个命题被接受或被拒绝的逻辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deductive systems with unified multiple-conclusion rules
Our goal is to develop a syntactical apparatus for propositional logics in which the accepted and rejected propositions have the same status and are being treated in the same way. The suggested approach is based on the ideas of Ƚukasiewicz used for the classical logic and in addition, it includes the use of multiple conclusion rules. A special attention is paid to the logics in which each proposition is either accepted or rejected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信