解开个人主义:对自我和社会评价的文化分析的启发式工具

Kobe De Keere
{"title":"解开个人主义:对自我和社会评价的文化分析的启发式工具","authors":"Kobe De Keere","doi":"10.20897/JCASC/3993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individualism belongs to the core of Western evaluative logic. This paper aims to determine what exactly now constitutes individualism as an often used cultural discourse and, more importantly, how its content varies depending on different semantic constellations. A systematic classification of different possible individualistic types of evaluation is proposed, which can eventually serve as a heuristic tool for further cultural analysis. The paper starts with identifying two essential meaning dimensions of freedom/control: (1) a self-dimension and (2) a society-dimension. Second, it explores how combinations of these different dimensions of meaning yield four different ‘semantic fields’, which all fall under the general heading of individualism, namely liberal, egalitarian, radical, and subjective individualism. These different types are described based on illustrations stemming from political, cultural, and philosophical domains.","PeriodicalId":274162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling Individualism: Toward a Heuristic Tool for Cultural Analyses of Evaluations of Self and Society\",\"authors\":\"Kobe De Keere\",\"doi\":\"10.20897/JCASC/3993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Individualism belongs to the core of Western evaluative logic. This paper aims to determine what exactly now constitutes individualism as an often used cultural discourse and, more importantly, how its content varies depending on different semantic constellations. A systematic classification of different possible individualistic types of evaluation is proposed, which can eventually serve as a heuristic tool for further cultural analysis. The paper starts with identifying two essential meaning dimensions of freedom/control: (1) a self-dimension and (2) a society-dimension. Second, it explores how combinations of these different dimensions of meaning yield four different ‘semantic fields’, which all fall under the general heading of individualism, namely liberal, egalitarian, radical, and subjective individualism. These different types are described based on illustrations stemming from political, cultural, and philosophical domains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":274162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20897/JCASC/3993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20897/JCASC/3993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

个人主义是西方评价逻辑的核心。本文旨在确定个人主义作为一种经常使用的文化话语的确切构成,更重要的是,其内容如何根据不同的语义星座而变化。本文提出了不同可能的个人主义评价类型的系统分类,最终可以作为进一步文化分析的启发式工具。本文首先确定了自由/控制的两个基本意义维度:(1)自我维度和(2)社会维度。其次,它探讨了这些不同意义维度的组合如何产生四种不同的“语义场”,它们都属于个人主义的总标题,即自由主义、平等主义、激进主义和主观个人主义。这些不同的类型是根据来自政治、文化和哲学领域的插图来描述的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disentangling Individualism: Toward a Heuristic Tool for Cultural Analyses of Evaluations of Self and Society
Individualism belongs to the core of Western evaluative logic. This paper aims to determine what exactly now constitutes individualism as an often used cultural discourse and, more importantly, how its content varies depending on different semantic constellations. A systematic classification of different possible individualistic types of evaluation is proposed, which can eventually serve as a heuristic tool for further cultural analysis. The paper starts with identifying two essential meaning dimensions of freedom/control: (1) a self-dimension and (2) a society-dimension. Second, it explores how combinations of these different dimensions of meaning yield four different ‘semantic fields’, which all fall under the general heading of individualism, namely liberal, egalitarian, radical, and subjective individualism. These different types are described based on illustrations stemming from political, cultural, and philosophical domains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信