供应链贷款

Dan Amiram, Xinlei Li, E. Owens
{"title":"供应链贷款","authors":"Dan Amiram, Xinlei Li, E. Owens","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3499812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the fact that economic interconnections among firms are very common, there is little research that examines the equilibrium outcome of such interconnections in credit markets. We examine how supply chain interconnections among borrowers within a lender’s loan portfolio affect equilibrium loan spread and lead arranger share in the syndicated loan market. We find that both loan spread and lead arranger share are significantly lower when the lead arranger has a pre-existing loan with the borrower’s major customer. This finding suggests that such “supply chain loans” ease syndicate participants’ moral hazard concerns more than they exacerbate concerns about adverse selection. We further document that these effects are stronger where syndicate participants’ information asymmetry concerns are more pronounced. Consistent with supply chain loans providing benefits to both the borrower and lead arranger, we provide evidence that a borrower is more likely to obtain a loan from a lender who already has an existing loan with its key customer. Our findings provide insights into the mechanisms through which supply chain interdependencies, and more generally, economic relationships, affect debt markets.","PeriodicalId":321552,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Capital Raising","volume":"349 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lending Along the Supply Chain\",\"authors\":\"Dan Amiram, Xinlei Li, E. Owens\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3499812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the fact that economic interconnections among firms are very common, there is little research that examines the equilibrium outcome of such interconnections in credit markets. We examine how supply chain interconnections among borrowers within a lender’s loan portfolio affect equilibrium loan spread and lead arranger share in the syndicated loan market. We find that both loan spread and lead arranger share are significantly lower when the lead arranger has a pre-existing loan with the borrower’s major customer. This finding suggests that such “supply chain loans” ease syndicate participants’ moral hazard concerns more than they exacerbate concerns about adverse selection. We further document that these effects are stronger where syndicate participants’ information asymmetry concerns are more pronounced. Consistent with supply chain loans providing benefits to both the borrower and lead arranger, we provide evidence that a borrower is more likely to obtain a loan from a lender who already has an existing loan with its key customer. Our findings provide insights into the mechanisms through which supply chain interdependencies, and more generally, economic relationships, affect debt markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Governance: Capital Raising\",\"volume\":\"349 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Governance: Capital Raising\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3499812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Capital Raising","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3499812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管企业之间的经济联系非常普遍,但很少有研究检验信贷市场中这种相互联系的均衡结果。我们研究了贷款人贷款组合中借款人之间的供应链互连如何影响银团贷款市场中的均衡贷款利差和牵头安排人份额。我们发现,当主安排人与借款人的主要客户有预先存在的贷款时,贷款利差和主安排人的份额都显着降低。这一发现表明,这种“供应链贷款”缓解了辛迪加参与者对道德风险的担忧,而不是加剧了对逆向选择的担忧。我们进一步证明,当辛迪加参与者的信息不对称问题更明显时,这些影响更强。与供应链贷款对借款人和牵头安排人都有利一致,我们提供的证据表明,借款人更有可能从已经与其关键客户有现有贷款的贷款人那里获得贷款。我们的研究结果为供应链相互依赖以及更普遍的经济关系影响债务市场的机制提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lending Along the Supply Chain
Despite the fact that economic interconnections among firms are very common, there is little research that examines the equilibrium outcome of such interconnections in credit markets. We examine how supply chain interconnections among borrowers within a lender’s loan portfolio affect equilibrium loan spread and lead arranger share in the syndicated loan market. We find that both loan spread and lead arranger share are significantly lower when the lead arranger has a pre-existing loan with the borrower’s major customer. This finding suggests that such “supply chain loans” ease syndicate participants’ moral hazard concerns more than they exacerbate concerns about adverse selection. We further document that these effects are stronger where syndicate participants’ information asymmetry concerns are more pronounced. Consistent with supply chain loans providing benefits to both the borrower and lead arranger, we provide evidence that a borrower is more likely to obtain a loan from a lender who already has an existing loan with its key customer. Our findings provide insights into the mechanisms through which supply chain interdependencies, and more generally, economic relationships, affect debt markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信