《产假福利修正案》(2017年):在印度,一份“不起眼的礼物”导致了母亲的处罚

Ananya Singla
{"title":"《产假福利修正案》(2017年):在印度,一份“不起眼的礼物”导致了母亲的处罚","authors":"Ananya Singla","doi":"10.56298/w9kss9hvwy","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The twin goals of addressing gender inequality and improving child development has manifested itself in the proliferation of maternity leave policies across the world. While maternity leave has become a standard entitlement in several countries, variations exist in policy design and their gendered outcomes, suggesting that policies are influenced by factors such as cultural and social norms. In 2017, the Government of India enacted the Maternity Benefit Amendment Act to extend paid maternity leave from 12 to 26 weeks and to provide other non-monetary child benefits. The Government described it as a ‘humble gift’ to women, a day after the world celebrated International Women’s Day. While it has been recognised on some levels that certain policies entrench gender inequality, an area that remains unexplored is how enduring assumptions rooted in the traditional gendered division of domestic and non-domestic labour have underpinned maternity support, particularly in the context of the Global South. This piece intends to engage with this gap by exploring how maternity policy was created in India and how the Government has conceptualised gender. Challenges include the narrow construction of women and family, the limited coverage of the policy to biological mothers and formal workers, and the impact of employers’ economic decisions such as discriminatory recruiting practices against women in response to higher leave costs.","PeriodicalId":394700,"journal":{"name":"The Graduate Inequality Review","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternity Benefit Amendment Act (2017): A ‘Humble Gift’ Causing Motherhood Penalty in India\",\"authors\":\"Ananya Singla\",\"doi\":\"10.56298/w9kss9hvwy\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The twin goals of addressing gender inequality and improving child development has manifested itself in the proliferation of maternity leave policies across the world. While maternity leave has become a standard entitlement in several countries, variations exist in policy design and their gendered outcomes, suggesting that policies are influenced by factors such as cultural and social norms. In 2017, the Government of India enacted the Maternity Benefit Amendment Act to extend paid maternity leave from 12 to 26 weeks and to provide other non-monetary child benefits. The Government described it as a ‘humble gift’ to women, a day after the world celebrated International Women’s Day. While it has been recognised on some levels that certain policies entrench gender inequality, an area that remains unexplored is how enduring assumptions rooted in the traditional gendered division of domestic and non-domestic labour have underpinned maternity support, particularly in the context of the Global South. This piece intends to engage with this gap by exploring how maternity policy was created in India and how the Government has conceptualised gender. Challenges include the narrow construction of women and family, the limited coverage of the policy to biological mothers and formal workers, and the impact of employers’ economic decisions such as discriminatory recruiting practices against women in response to higher leave costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Graduate Inequality Review\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Graduate Inequality Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56298/w9kss9hvwy\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Graduate Inequality Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56298/w9kss9hvwy","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

解决性别不平等和改善儿童发展的双重目标在世界各地产假政策的激增中得到了体现。虽然产假在一些国家已成为一项标准权利,但在政策设计及其按性别划分的结果方面存在差异,这表明政策受到文化和社会规范等因素的影响。2017年,印度政府颁布了《产假福利修正案》,将带薪产假从12周延长至26周,并提供其他非货币性儿童福利。在世界庆祝国际妇女节的第二天,政府将其描述为送给妇女的“谦卑的礼物”。虽然在某种程度上已经认识到某些政策加剧了性别不平等,但一个尚未探索的领域是,根植于传统的家务和非家务劳动性别分工的持久假设如何支撑了对产妇的支持,特别是在全球南方的背景下。这篇文章打算通过探讨印度如何制定生育政策以及政府如何将性别概念化来解决这一差距。挑战包括妇女和家庭的狭隘结构,该政策对生母和正式工人的覆盖范围有限,以及雇主的经济决定的影响,例如为应对较高的休假费用而对妇女采取歧视性招聘做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maternity Benefit Amendment Act (2017): A ‘Humble Gift’ Causing Motherhood Penalty in India
The twin goals of addressing gender inequality and improving child development has manifested itself in the proliferation of maternity leave policies across the world. While maternity leave has become a standard entitlement in several countries, variations exist in policy design and their gendered outcomes, suggesting that policies are influenced by factors such as cultural and social norms. In 2017, the Government of India enacted the Maternity Benefit Amendment Act to extend paid maternity leave from 12 to 26 weeks and to provide other non-monetary child benefits. The Government described it as a ‘humble gift’ to women, a day after the world celebrated International Women’s Day. While it has been recognised on some levels that certain policies entrench gender inequality, an area that remains unexplored is how enduring assumptions rooted in the traditional gendered division of domestic and non-domestic labour have underpinned maternity support, particularly in the context of the Global South. This piece intends to engage with this gap by exploring how maternity policy was created in India and how the Government has conceptualised gender. Challenges include the narrow construction of women and family, the limited coverage of the policy to biological mothers and formal workers, and the impact of employers’ economic decisions such as discriminatory recruiting practices against women in response to higher leave costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信