土地使用权VIS-À-VIS采矿权:从Maledu等人诉Itireleng Bakgatla Mineral Resources (Pty) Ltd和Another案中吸取的教训讨论2019 (1)BCLR 53 (CC)

Themba Mathebula
{"title":"土地使用权VIS-À-VIS采矿权:从Maledu等人诉Itireleng Bakgatla Mineral Resources (Pty) Ltd和Another案中吸取的教训讨论2019 (1)BCLR 53 (CC)","authors":"Themba Mathebula","doi":"10.36941/jicd-2022-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Land remains a contentious issue in South African history to date. It provides people with hope and various opportunities. This paper discusses the right of access to land and the right to mine. The paper discusses at length the requirements set at law and considered significant for compliance to attain these rights. Four dominant issues emerge from the discussion namely land, mining rights, consultation and consent as well as deprivation as pillars adjoined to critique the fundamental legal requirements needed to access land and to mine it. Mining companies compete for access to the country’s mineral lands and petroleum resources to exploit them relentlessly. Whilst South Africa has been installed as the conduit of the nation’s mineral and petroleum resources, the need to enforce compliance with the requirements set a national law is critical to avoid illegal mining and unlawful deprivation of land for mining purposes. This is because most of the land in South Africa is communal or belong to private owners, concentrated with the mineral wealth. Legislation such as the Interim Protection of Informal Land Rights Act 31 of 1996(IPILRA) and the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002(MPRDA), as amended, are triggered for this discussion. \n  \nReceived: 22 August 2022 / Accepted: 30 October 2022 / Published: 5 November 2022","PeriodicalId":302999,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Cooperation and Development","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Right of Access to Land VIS-À-VIS the Right to Mine: The Discussion on the Lessons Drawn from the Case of Maledu and Others v Itireleng Bakgatla Mineral Resources (Pty) Ltd and Another 2019 (1) BCLR 53 (CC)\",\"authors\":\"Themba Mathebula\",\"doi\":\"10.36941/jicd-2022-0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Land remains a contentious issue in South African history to date. It provides people with hope and various opportunities. This paper discusses the right of access to land and the right to mine. The paper discusses at length the requirements set at law and considered significant for compliance to attain these rights. Four dominant issues emerge from the discussion namely land, mining rights, consultation and consent as well as deprivation as pillars adjoined to critique the fundamental legal requirements needed to access land and to mine it. Mining companies compete for access to the country’s mineral lands and petroleum resources to exploit them relentlessly. Whilst South Africa has been installed as the conduit of the nation’s mineral and petroleum resources, the need to enforce compliance with the requirements set a national law is critical to avoid illegal mining and unlawful deprivation of land for mining purposes. This is because most of the land in South Africa is communal or belong to private owners, concentrated with the mineral wealth. Legislation such as the Interim Protection of Informal Land Rights Act 31 of 1996(IPILRA) and the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002(MPRDA), as amended, are triggered for this discussion. \\n  \\nReceived: 22 August 2022 / Accepted: 30 October 2022 / Published: 5 November 2022\",\"PeriodicalId\":302999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Cooperation and Development\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Cooperation and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36941/jicd-2022-0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Cooperation and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36941/jicd-2022-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

迄今为止,在南非历史上,土地仍然是一个有争议的问题。它为人们提供了希望和各种机会。本文讨论了土地使用权和矿业权。本文详细讨论了法律规定的要求,并认为遵守这些要求对获得这些权利具有重要意义。讨论中出现了四个主要问题,即土地、采矿权、协商和同意以及剥夺,这些问题是批评取得土地和开采土地所需的基本法律要求的支柱。矿业公司竞相进入该国的矿产土地和石油资源,无情地开采它们。虽然南非已成为该国矿物和石油资源的管道,但必须强制遵守国家法律规定的要求,这对于避免非法采矿和非法剥夺土地用于采矿目的是至关重要的。这是因为南非的大部分土地是公有的或属于私人所有,集中于矿产财富。1996年第31号《非正式土地权利临时保护法案》(IPILRA)和2002年第28号《矿产和石油资源开发法》(MPRDA)等立法,经修订,引发了这一讨论。收稿日期:2022年8月22日/收稿日期:2022年10月30日/发表日期:2022年11月5日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Right of Access to Land VIS-À-VIS the Right to Mine: The Discussion on the Lessons Drawn from the Case of Maledu and Others v Itireleng Bakgatla Mineral Resources (Pty) Ltd and Another 2019 (1) BCLR 53 (CC)
Land remains a contentious issue in South African history to date. It provides people with hope and various opportunities. This paper discusses the right of access to land and the right to mine. The paper discusses at length the requirements set at law and considered significant for compliance to attain these rights. Four dominant issues emerge from the discussion namely land, mining rights, consultation and consent as well as deprivation as pillars adjoined to critique the fundamental legal requirements needed to access land and to mine it. Mining companies compete for access to the country’s mineral lands and petroleum resources to exploit them relentlessly. Whilst South Africa has been installed as the conduit of the nation’s mineral and petroleum resources, the need to enforce compliance with the requirements set a national law is critical to avoid illegal mining and unlawful deprivation of land for mining purposes. This is because most of the land in South Africa is communal or belong to private owners, concentrated with the mineral wealth. Legislation such as the Interim Protection of Informal Land Rights Act 31 of 1996(IPILRA) and the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002(MPRDA), as amended, are triggered for this discussion.   Received: 22 August 2022 / Accepted: 30 October 2022 / Published: 5 November 2022
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信