包容性公共研究

Jadi Suriadi
{"title":"包容性公共研究","authors":"Jadi Suriadi","doi":"10.56971/jwi.v6i1.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nIt had identifed clearly in working of research methodology, there are alot of certain aspects, variables or elements in social science or humanity under dynamic, multipolarrecyprocal causality and in a complex condition. Therefore approching to qualitative or quantitative methodology require enrichment with empirical aproach, especially people involvement.  The researhed need to run and to configure inclusiveness, \nThis research aim to explore using of  wellbeing methodology (WM)  approach,  to implemen social research, whit a case study named as ICB.. the research gap  to be identified, are: 1) is it possible to design an instrument of measurement tool to measure ICB?; 2) is the toll possible to implemented, to measrue ICB?; 3) may the outcome to transform to material of public education?Based on teoritical dan conseptual explanation,  data exploration, explanation and certain detail measurement of peeception, partiipation and acceptability of people, the answers are a proof. Yes, there are.  the hyphoteses are solved in qualitative approach. \nFurtherfor, ther are 6 variables and 18 significancy hiphoteser to confogure scorring of perception, participation and acceptibility of people. With scale 9, and scor of significancy preference is, the data show that the scorring all bove. Meaning thtat all scor in significant condition. \nWM introduce a new perspective of approaching to capture closed reality of research object, in term of index of county brandinng (ICB).   In certain conceptual, logic order and procedure, WM can be implemented widely, such as IDG/s issue.","PeriodicalId":284440,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kewidyaiswaraan","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusiveness public research\",\"authors\":\"Jadi Suriadi\",\"doi\":\"10.56971/jwi.v6i1.103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nIt had identifed clearly in working of research methodology, there are alot of certain aspects, variables or elements in social science or humanity under dynamic, multipolarrecyprocal causality and in a complex condition. Therefore approching to qualitative or quantitative methodology require enrichment with empirical aproach, especially people involvement.  The researhed need to run and to configure inclusiveness, \\nThis research aim to explore using of  wellbeing methodology (WM)  approach,  to implemen social research, whit a case study named as ICB.. the research gap  to be identified, are: 1) is it possible to design an instrument of measurement tool to measure ICB?; 2) is the toll possible to implemented, to measrue ICB?; 3) may the outcome to transform to material of public education?Based on teoritical dan conseptual explanation,  data exploration, explanation and certain detail measurement of peeception, partiipation and acceptability of people, the answers are a proof. Yes, there are.  the hyphoteses are solved in qualitative approach. \\nFurtherfor, ther are 6 variables and 18 significancy hiphoteser to confogure scorring of perception, participation and acceptibility of people. With scale 9, and scor of significancy preference is, the data show that the scorring all bove. Meaning thtat all scor in significant condition. \\nWM introduce a new perspective of approaching to capture closed reality of research object, in term of index of county brandinng (ICB).   In certain conceptual, logic order and procedure, WM can be implemented widely, such as IDG/s issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Kewidyaiswaraan\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Kewidyaiswaraan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56971/jwi.v6i1.103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kewidyaiswaraan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56971/jwi.v6i1.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在研究方法论的工作中已经明确地认识到,社会科学或人文科学中的许多特定方面、变量或要素处于动态的、多极循环的因果关系中,处于一个复杂的状态。因此,接近定性或定量的方法需要丰富的经验方法,特别是人的参与。研究需要运行和配置包容性,本研究旨在探索使用福祉方法论(WM)方法,实施社会研究,并以个案研究命名为ICB。需要识别的研究差距有:1)是否有可能设计一种测量工具来测量ICB;2)是否有可能实施收费,以衡量ICB?3)成果能否转化为公共教育的材料?基于地域和概念解释、数据挖掘、解释以及对人们的感知、参与和可接受性的一定细节测量,得出的答案是一种证明。是的,有。用定性方法解决了这些假设。此外,有6个变量和18个显著性参数来配置人们的感知、参与和可接受性得分。用量表9,显著性偏好得分为,数据显示得分均高于。意思是所有的分数都在显著状态。从县域品牌化指数的角度,引入了一种捕捉研究对象封闭现实的新视角。在一定的概念、逻辑顺序和程序中,WM可以广泛实现,例如IDG/s问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inclusiveness public research
Abstract It had identifed clearly in working of research methodology, there are alot of certain aspects, variables or elements in social science or humanity under dynamic, multipolarrecyprocal causality and in a complex condition. Therefore approching to qualitative or quantitative methodology require enrichment with empirical aproach, especially people involvement.  The researhed need to run and to configure inclusiveness, This research aim to explore using of  wellbeing methodology (WM)  approach,  to implemen social research, whit a case study named as ICB.. the research gap  to be identified, are: 1) is it possible to design an instrument of measurement tool to measure ICB?; 2) is the toll possible to implemented, to measrue ICB?; 3) may the outcome to transform to material of public education?Based on teoritical dan conseptual explanation,  data exploration, explanation and certain detail measurement of peeception, partiipation and acceptability of people, the answers are a proof. Yes, there are.  the hyphoteses are solved in qualitative approach. Furtherfor, ther are 6 variables and 18 significancy hiphoteser to confogure scorring of perception, participation and acceptibility of people. With scale 9, and scor of significancy preference is, the data show that the scorring all bove. Meaning thtat all scor in significant condition. WM introduce a new perspective of approaching to capture closed reality of research object, in term of index of county brandinng (ICB).   In certain conceptual, logic order and procedure, WM can be implemented widely, such as IDG/s issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信