结合数值和视觉方法验证消费者可穿戴腕带的睡眠数据质量

Zilu Liang, Mario Alberto Chapa Martell
{"title":"结合数值和视觉方法验证消费者可穿戴腕带的睡眠数据质量","authors":"Zilu Liang, Mario Alberto Chapa Martell","doi":"10.1109/PERCOMW.2019.8730805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent rise of the Quantified Self movement has witnessed a significant increase in the adoption of consumer wearable wristbands for sleep tracking. Nevertheless, data quality of these devices has been a main concern. This study aimed to validate a most popular consumer wristband, i.e. Fitbit Charge 2™, against medical devices. We proposed a new validation approach that combines numerical technique with visual aid for epoch-by-epoch comparison on sleep stages. We found that Fitbit Charge 2™ had low accuracy in detecting wake and reasonable accuracy in detecting light, deep, and REM sleep stages. The visual aid of scatter plots showed that Fitbit was more accurate in detecting deep sleep stage in the first half of a night and more accurate in detecting REM sleep stage in the second half of a night. Our results indicate that consumer wearable wristbands are not able to produce high quality data of sleep stages in ecological settings. Future studies should consider the effect of time on device accuracy and may resort to segmented modelling techniques to improve data quality.","PeriodicalId":437017,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops)","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining Numerical and Visual Approaches in Validating Sleep Data Quality of Consumer Wearable Wristbands\",\"authors\":\"Zilu Liang, Mario Alberto Chapa Martell\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PERCOMW.2019.8730805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recent rise of the Quantified Self movement has witnessed a significant increase in the adoption of consumer wearable wristbands for sleep tracking. Nevertheless, data quality of these devices has been a main concern. This study aimed to validate a most popular consumer wristband, i.e. Fitbit Charge 2™, against medical devices. We proposed a new validation approach that combines numerical technique with visual aid for epoch-by-epoch comparison on sleep stages. We found that Fitbit Charge 2™ had low accuracy in detecting wake and reasonable accuracy in detecting light, deep, and REM sleep stages. The visual aid of scatter plots showed that Fitbit was more accurate in detecting deep sleep stage in the first half of a night and more accurate in detecting REM sleep stage in the second half of a night. Our results indicate that consumer wearable wristbands are not able to produce high quality data of sleep stages in ecological settings. Future studies should consider the effect of time on device accuracy and may resort to segmented modelling techniques to improve data quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops)\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2019.8730805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2019.8730805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

最近兴起的“量化自我”运动见证了用于睡眠跟踪的消费者可穿戴腕带的显著增加。然而,这些设备的数据质量一直是一个主要问题。本研究旨在验证最受欢迎的消费者腕带,即Fitbit Charge 2™与医疗设备的对比。我们提出了一种新的验证方法,将数值技术与视觉辅助相结合,用于睡眠阶段的逐epoch比较。我们发现Fitbit Charge 2™在检测唤醒方面具有较低的准确性,而在检测浅睡眠、深度睡眠和快速眼动睡眠阶段具有合理的准确性。散点图视觉辅助显示,Fitbit对前半晚深度睡眠阶段的检测更准确,对后半晚快速眼动睡眠阶段的检测更准确。我们的研究结果表明,消费者可穿戴腕带不能在生态环境下产生高质量的睡眠阶段数据。未来的研究应考虑时间对设备精度的影响,并可能采用分段建模技术来提高数据质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining Numerical and Visual Approaches in Validating Sleep Data Quality of Consumer Wearable Wristbands
The recent rise of the Quantified Self movement has witnessed a significant increase in the adoption of consumer wearable wristbands for sleep tracking. Nevertheless, data quality of these devices has been a main concern. This study aimed to validate a most popular consumer wristband, i.e. Fitbit Charge 2™, against medical devices. We proposed a new validation approach that combines numerical technique with visual aid for epoch-by-epoch comparison on sleep stages. We found that Fitbit Charge 2™ had low accuracy in detecting wake and reasonable accuracy in detecting light, deep, and REM sleep stages. The visual aid of scatter plots showed that Fitbit was more accurate in detecting deep sleep stage in the first half of a night and more accurate in detecting REM sleep stage in the second half of a night. Our results indicate that consumer wearable wristbands are not able to produce high quality data of sleep stages in ecological settings. Future studies should consider the effect of time on device accuracy and may resort to segmented modelling techniques to improve data quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信