民族文化对社会和组织领导的影响:为什么塞尔维亚人喜欢专制领导人

Nebojša Janićijević
{"title":"民族文化对社会和组织领导的影响:为什么塞尔维亚人喜欢专制领导人","authors":"Nebojša Janićijević","doi":"10.20472/ahc.2019.005.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The paper analyses the impact of national culture on leadership and leadership styles. It has been determined that national culture impacts leadership and leadership styles by defining the meanings that both the leader and his followers ascribe to the reality that surrounds them. The analysis includes the impact that the dimensions of national culture, identified in the Geert Hofstede’s and GLOBE’s researches, have on leadership. The paper analyses the impact that the dimensions of national culture have on two main dimensions used to differentiate leadership styles: authoritarianism–participative orientation and task orientation–people orientation. It has been determined that power distance and individualism–collectivism as well as uncertainty avoidance and assertiveness decisively impact the selection between authoritarian and participative leadership styles. The national culture’s “masculinity”–“femininity” dimension, as well as gender equality, performance orientation, people orientation, and future orientation correlated with it, impact the selection between people orientation and task orientation. In certain contexts, a high uncertainty avoidance also impacts this leadership dimension. By intertwining two leadership styles’ dimension, four leadership styles are created, as well as cultural contexts in which each of the styles is favoured, preferred, and thereby more effective. Serbian national culture, with its assumptions and values, implies using of authoritarian people-oriented style.","PeriodicalId":294953,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th Arts & Humanities Conference, Copenhagen","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE IMPACT OF NATIONAL CULTURE ON LEADESRHIP IN SOCETY AND ORGANIZATIONS: WHY DO SERBS LOVE AUTHORITARIAN LEADERS\",\"authors\":\"Nebojša Janićijević\",\"doi\":\"10.20472/ahc.2019.005.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The paper analyses the impact of national culture on leadership and leadership styles. It has been determined that national culture impacts leadership and leadership styles by defining the meanings that both the leader and his followers ascribe to the reality that surrounds them. The analysis includes the impact that the dimensions of national culture, identified in the Geert Hofstede’s and GLOBE’s researches, have on leadership. The paper analyses the impact that the dimensions of national culture have on two main dimensions used to differentiate leadership styles: authoritarianism–participative orientation and task orientation–people orientation. It has been determined that power distance and individualism–collectivism as well as uncertainty avoidance and assertiveness decisively impact the selection between authoritarian and participative leadership styles. The national culture’s “masculinity”–“femininity” dimension, as well as gender equality, performance orientation, people orientation, and future orientation correlated with it, impact the selection between people orientation and task orientation. In certain contexts, a high uncertainty avoidance also impacts this leadership dimension. By intertwining two leadership styles’ dimension, four leadership styles are created, as well as cultural contexts in which each of the styles is favoured, preferred, and thereby more effective. Serbian national culture, with its assumptions and values, implies using of authoritarian people-oriented style.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 5th Arts & Humanities Conference, Copenhagen\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 5th Arts & Humanities Conference, Copenhagen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20472/ahc.2019.005.013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th Arts & Humanities Conference, Copenhagen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20472/ahc.2019.005.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了民族文化对领导能力和领导风格的影响。已经确定,国家文化通过定义领导者及其追随者赋予他们周围现实的意义来影响领导和领导风格。该分析包括Geert Hofstede和GLOBE研究中确定的民族文化维度对领导力的影响。本文分析了民族文化维度对用于区分领导风格的两个主要维度的影响:威权主义-参与导向和任务导向-以人为本。权力距离、个人主义-集体主义以及不确定性规避和自信对专制型和参与型领导风格的选择具有决定性影响。民族文化的“男性气质”-“女性气质”维度,以及与之相关的性别平等、绩效取向、人取向、未来取向,影响着人取向与任务取向的选择。在某些情况下,高度的不确定性规避也会影响这一领导维度。通过将两种领导风格的维度相互交织,创建了四种领导风格,以及每种风格都受到青睐,首选从而更有效的文化背景。塞尔维亚的民族文化,其假设和价值观,意味着使用专制的以人为本的风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE IMPACT OF NATIONAL CULTURE ON LEADESRHIP IN SOCETY AND ORGANIZATIONS: WHY DO SERBS LOVE AUTHORITARIAN LEADERS
: The paper analyses the impact of national culture on leadership and leadership styles. It has been determined that national culture impacts leadership and leadership styles by defining the meanings that both the leader and his followers ascribe to the reality that surrounds them. The analysis includes the impact that the dimensions of national culture, identified in the Geert Hofstede’s and GLOBE’s researches, have on leadership. The paper analyses the impact that the dimensions of national culture have on two main dimensions used to differentiate leadership styles: authoritarianism–participative orientation and task orientation–people orientation. It has been determined that power distance and individualism–collectivism as well as uncertainty avoidance and assertiveness decisively impact the selection between authoritarian and participative leadership styles. The national culture’s “masculinity”–“femininity” dimension, as well as gender equality, performance orientation, people orientation, and future orientation correlated with it, impact the selection between people orientation and task orientation. In certain contexts, a high uncertainty avoidance also impacts this leadership dimension. By intertwining two leadership styles’ dimension, four leadership styles are created, as well as cultural contexts in which each of the styles is favoured, preferred, and thereby more effective. Serbian national culture, with its assumptions and values, implies using of authoritarian people-oriented style.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信