多孔眼窝植入物的相关问题

D. Jordan
{"title":"多孔眼窝植入物的相关问题","authors":"D. Jordan","doi":"10.1076/OTOO.4.1.39.8492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. To assess the problems and complications associated with the use of 120 synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA) implants and contrast them to other currently available porous orbital implants (Bio-Eye®, Molteno® M-Sphere TM, Brazilian HA, Chinese HA, Medpore TM – porous polyethylene and Bioceramic implants). Methods. The authors analyzed all of the problems and/or complications associated with the use of a synthetic hydroxyapatite implant (FCI 3) in 120 patients by one surgeon over 4 years. The following data were recorded: age, type of surgery performed, size of implant used, peg system used, follow-up duration, time of pegging, problems and/or complications encountered, and treatment. Results. Thirteen patients were lost to follow up after 3 months, leaving 107 patients who were followed from 4 to 48 months (average 29 months). Discharge occurred in 21 (19.6%) patients, implant exposure in 3 (2.8%), socket discomfort in 2 (1.9%), trochleitis in 2 (1.9%), conjunctival thinning in 1 (0.93%), pyogenic granu...","PeriodicalId":206710,"journal":{"name":"Operative Techniques in Oculoplastic, Orbital and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problems associated with porous orbital implants\",\"authors\":\"D. Jordan\",\"doi\":\"10.1076/OTOO.4.1.39.8492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose. To assess the problems and complications associated with the use of 120 synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA) implants and contrast them to other currently available porous orbital implants (Bio-Eye®, Molteno® M-Sphere TM, Brazilian HA, Chinese HA, Medpore TM – porous polyethylene and Bioceramic implants). Methods. The authors analyzed all of the problems and/or complications associated with the use of a synthetic hydroxyapatite implant (FCI 3) in 120 patients by one surgeon over 4 years. The following data were recorded: age, type of surgery performed, size of implant used, peg system used, follow-up duration, time of pegging, problems and/or complications encountered, and treatment. Results. Thirteen patients were lost to follow up after 3 months, leaving 107 patients who were followed from 4 to 48 months (average 29 months). Discharge occurred in 21 (19.6%) patients, implant exposure in 3 (2.8%), socket discomfort in 2 (1.9%), trochleitis in 2 (1.9%), conjunctival thinning in 1 (0.93%), pyogenic granu...\",\"PeriodicalId\":206710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative Techniques in Oculoplastic, Orbital and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative Techniques in Oculoplastic, Orbital and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1076/OTOO.4.1.39.8492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Techniques in Oculoplastic, Orbital and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1076/OTOO.4.1.39.8492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的。评估使用120种合成羟基磷灰石(HA)植入物的相关问题和并发症,并将其与目前可用的其他多孔眶内植入物(Bio-Eye®,Molteno®M-Sphere TM,巴西HA,中国HA, Medpore TM -多孔聚乙烯和生物陶瓷植入物)进行对比。方法。作者分析了一名外科医生在4年内对120例患者使用合成羟基磷灰石植入物(FCI 3)的所有问题和/或并发症。记录以下数据:年龄、手术类型、种植体大小、钉钉系统、随访时间、钉钉时间、遇到的问题和/或并发症以及治疗情况。结果。3个月后失访13例,其余107例随访4 ~ 48个月(平均29个月)。21例(19.6%)患者出现出院,3例(2.8%)患者出现种植体暴露,2例(1.9%)患者出现眼窝不适,2例(1.9%)患者出现滑车炎,1例(0.93%)患者出现结膜变薄,1例(0.93%)患者出现化脓性颗粒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problems associated with porous orbital implants
Purpose. To assess the problems and complications associated with the use of 120 synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA) implants and contrast them to other currently available porous orbital implants (Bio-Eye®, Molteno® M-Sphere TM, Brazilian HA, Chinese HA, Medpore TM – porous polyethylene and Bioceramic implants). Methods. The authors analyzed all of the problems and/or complications associated with the use of a synthetic hydroxyapatite implant (FCI 3) in 120 patients by one surgeon over 4 years. The following data were recorded: age, type of surgery performed, size of implant used, peg system used, follow-up duration, time of pegging, problems and/or complications encountered, and treatment. Results. Thirteen patients were lost to follow up after 3 months, leaving 107 patients who were followed from 4 to 48 months (average 29 months). Discharge occurred in 21 (19.6%) patients, implant exposure in 3 (2.8%), socket discomfort in 2 (1.9%), trochleitis in 2 (1.9%), conjunctival thinning in 1 (0.93%), pyogenic granu...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信