{"title":"多孔眼窝植入物的相关问题","authors":"D. Jordan","doi":"10.1076/OTOO.4.1.39.8492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. To assess the problems and complications associated with the use of 120 synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA) implants and contrast them to other currently available porous orbital implants (Bio-Eye®, Molteno® M-Sphere TM, Brazilian HA, Chinese HA, Medpore TM – porous polyethylene and Bioceramic implants). Methods. The authors analyzed all of the problems and/or complications associated with the use of a synthetic hydroxyapatite implant (FCI 3) in 120 patients by one surgeon over 4 years. The following data were recorded: age, type of surgery performed, size of implant used, peg system used, follow-up duration, time of pegging, problems and/or complications encountered, and treatment. Results. Thirteen patients were lost to follow up after 3 months, leaving 107 patients who were followed from 4 to 48 months (average 29 months). Discharge occurred in 21 (19.6%) patients, implant exposure in 3 (2.8%), socket discomfort in 2 (1.9%), trochleitis in 2 (1.9%), conjunctival thinning in 1 (0.93%), pyogenic granu...","PeriodicalId":206710,"journal":{"name":"Operative Techniques in Oculoplastic, Orbital and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problems associated with porous orbital implants\",\"authors\":\"D. Jordan\",\"doi\":\"10.1076/OTOO.4.1.39.8492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose. To assess the problems and complications associated with the use of 120 synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA) implants and contrast them to other currently available porous orbital implants (Bio-Eye®, Molteno® M-Sphere TM, Brazilian HA, Chinese HA, Medpore TM – porous polyethylene and Bioceramic implants). Methods. The authors analyzed all of the problems and/or complications associated with the use of a synthetic hydroxyapatite implant (FCI 3) in 120 patients by one surgeon over 4 years. The following data were recorded: age, type of surgery performed, size of implant used, peg system used, follow-up duration, time of pegging, problems and/or complications encountered, and treatment. Results. Thirteen patients were lost to follow up after 3 months, leaving 107 patients who were followed from 4 to 48 months (average 29 months). Discharge occurred in 21 (19.6%) patients, implant exposure in 3 (2.8%), socket discomfort in 2 (1.9%), trochleitis in 2 (1.9%), conjunctival thinning in 1 (0.93%), pyogenic granu...\",\"PeriodicalId\":206710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative Techniques in Oculoplastic, Orbital and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative Techniques in Oculoplastic, Orbital and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1076/OTOO.4.1.39.8492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Techniques in Oculoplastic, Orbital and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1076/OTOO.4.1.39.8492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose. To assess the problems and complications associated with the use of 120 synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA) implants and contrast them to other currently available porous orbital implants (Bio-Eye®, Molteno® M-Sphere TM, Brazilian HA, Chinese HA, Medpore TM – porous polyethylene and Bioceramic implants). Methods. The authors analyzed all of the problems and/or complications associated with the use of a synthetic hydroxyapatite implant (FCI 3) in 120 patients by one surgeon over 4 years. The following data were recorded: age, type of surgery performed, size of implant used, peg system used, follow-up duration, time of pegging, problems and/or complications encountered, and treatment. Results. Thirteen patients were lost to follow up after 3 months, leaving 107 patients who were followed from 4 to 48 months (average 29 months). Discharge occurred in 21 (19.6%) patients, implant exposure in 3 (2.8%), socket discomfort in 2 (1.9%), trochleitis in 2 (1.9%), conjunctival thinning in 1 (0.93%), pyogenic granu...