{"title":"社会学播客:危机时刻的激进希望、关怀和团结","authors":"C. Lewis, Tissot Regis, George Ofori-Addo","doi":"10.3898/soun.79.06.2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sociological podcasting is a radical way of communicating scholarship and assisting in the kinds of knowledge production needed in a heightened period of political calamity. It is part of a vast body of scholarship, work and art produced to contest the grand narratives which have come\n to dominate our understandings of society. It has the potential to make more legible the interconnections that underpin our most pressing issues as a society. This article discusses its role as public sociology, looking at the work of Michael Burawoy as well as some of his critics such as\n John Holmwood, Avi Goldberg and Axel van den Berg. It also discusses its creativity in taking listeners beyond the (academic) written word, and its potential for resisting and countering 'presentism' (accounts of events that are unhistorical and contextfree). Sociological podcasting has the\n capacity to generate hope and care, and here the work of Patricia Hill Collins is seen as exemplary, as is the work of Bev Skeggs and the Solidarity and Care collective. The dialogical characteristics of sociological podcasting are strengthened by the possibility it offers of drawing on real\n life examples of events, people and collectives. The authors - the people who produce the Surviving Society podcast - are resistant to positioning such projects as anything other than a collective endeavour, but are also mindful that, as Black creatives, podcasters and academics, their method\n and praxis can be overexposed to processes of co-option, plagiarism and erasure.","PeriodicalId":403400,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sociological podcasting: radical hope, care and solidarity in a time of crisis\",\"authors\":\"C. Lewis, Tissot Regis, George Ofori-Addo\",\"doi\":\"10.3898/soun.79.06.2021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sociological podcasting is a radical way of communicating scholarship and assisting in the kinds of knowledge production needed in a heightened period of political calamity. It is part of a vast body of scholarship, work and art produced to contest the grand narratives which have come\\n to dominate our understandings of society. It has the potential to make more legible the interconnections that underpin our most pressing issues as a society. This article discusses its role as public sociology, looking at the work of Michael Burawoy as well as some of his critics such as\\n John Holmwood, Avi Goldberg and Axel van den Berg. It also discusses its creativity in taking listeners beyond the (academic) written word, and its potential for resisting and countering 'presentism' (accounts of events that are unhistorical and contextfree). Sociological podcasting has the\\n capacity to generate hope and care, and here the work of Patricia Hill Collins is seen as exemplary, as is the work of Bev Skeggs and the Solidarity and Care collective. The dialogical characteristics of sociological podcasting are strengthened by the possibility it offers of drawing on real\\n life examples of events, people and collectives. The authors - the people who produce the Surviving Society podcast - are resistant to positioning such projects as anything other than a collective endeavour, but are also mindful that, as Black creatives, podcasters and academics, their method\\n and praxis can be overexposed to processes of co-option, plagiarism and erasure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3898/soun.79.06.2021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/soun.79.06.2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
社会学播客是一种激进的学术交流方式,有助于在政治灾难加剧时期所需的各种知识生产。它是大量学术、作品和艺术作品的一部分,这些作品和艺术作品都是为了挑战那些主宰我们对社会理解的宏大叙事。它有可能使支撑我们作为一个社会最紧迫问题的相互联系变得更加清晰。本文讨论了它作为公共社会学的作用,考察了Michael burawey的作品以及他的一些批评者,如John Holmwood, Avi Goldberg和Axel van den Berg。它还讨论了它在让听众超越(学术)书面文字方面的创造力,以及它抵制和抵制“现在主义”(对非历史和背景无关的事件的描述)的潜力。社会学播客有能力产生希望和关怀,帕特里夏·希尔·柯林斯(Patricia Hill Collins)的作品被视为典范,贝夫·斯凯格斯(Bev Skeggs)和“团结与关怀”(Solidarity and care)团体的作品也是如此。社会学播客的对话特征因其提供了借鉴事件、人物和集体的真实生活实例的可能性而得到加强。这些作者——制作“幸存社会”播客的人——不愿将这些项目定位为集体努力之外的任何东西,但他们也注意到,作为黑人创意、播客和学者,他们的方法和实践可能会过度暴露于合用、抄袭和删除的过程中。
Sociological podcasting: radical hope, care and solidarity in a time of crisis
Sociological podcasting is a radical way of communicating scholarship and assisting in the kinds of knowledge production needed in a heightened period of political calamity. It is part of a vast body of scholarship, work and art produced to contest the grand narratives which have come
to dominate our understandings of society. It has the potential to make more legible the interconnections that underpin our most pressing issues as a society. This article discusses its role as public sociology, looking at the work of Michael Burawoy as well as some of his critics such as
John Holmwood, Avi Goldberg and Axel van den Berg. It also discusses its creativity in taking listeners beyond the (academic) written word, and its potential for resisting and countering 'presentism' (accounts of events that are unhistorical and contextfree). Sociological podcasting has the
capacity to generate hope and care, and here the work of Patricia Hill Collins is seen as exemplary, as is the work of Bev Skeggs and the Solidarity and Care collective. The dialogical characteristics of sociological podcasting are strengthened by the possibility it offers of drawing on real
life examples of events, people and collectives. The authors - the people who produce the Surviving Society podcast - are resistant to positioning such projects as anything other than a collective endeavour, but are also mindful that, as Black creatives, podcasters and academics, their method
and praxis can be overexposed to processes of co-option, plagiarism and erasure.