增加学生说话时间是优化口语教学的一种手段

N. V. Nazarova
{"title":"增加学生说话时间是优化口语教学的一种手段","authors":"N. V. Nazarova","doi":"10.35213/2686-7516-2022-3-3-50-57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with some issues concerning optimization of speaking teaching, namely the impact of Student Talking Time on students mastering of such reproductive skill as speaking. Though methodological literature does not define the exact amount of STT and Teacher Talking Time and the correlation between the two, it is noted that the relation depends to a great degree in the level of a foreign language learning. Thus on the initial level it is quite obvious that TTT accounts for a larger portion of a lesson, including teachers explanations, pronunciation drilling, correction of mistakes, introduction of new words and grammar structures. In a group with A1 students it would be reasonable that a ration between TTT and STT corresponds to 50-50 %. In groups of A2-B2 students the amount of TTT should be about 30% with STT aiming at 70%. In advanced level groups (C1-2) a teacher should strive to the ration of 10% to 90% respectively. In addition, the amount of TTT also depends on a task or assignment and a form of a lesson. \nBesides, another important factor, i.e. Student Waiting Time (SWT) should also be taken into consideration, by this we mean, the amount of time a student waits in a group for their turn to give an oral answer. \nThe paper presents some findings of an experiment which was conducted among 2 groups of 12 students at Samara branch of Moscow City Pedagogical University. The experiment was aimed at distinguishing the correlation between STT and SWT depending on an activity done at a lesson. It was proved that when students were asked to answer one question each their TT accounted for 12 minutes with SWT totaling at 11 minutes. When the students worked in groups of 3 and discussed 4 questions the STT increased up to 36 minutes and STW amounted at 9 minutes. When the students worked in pairs and were asked to discuss 6 question their STT was 36 minutes with SWT only 6 minutes, which showed that this form of work was the optimal. \nThe increase of STT and reduction of SWT stimulates the students rising their satisfaction from the lesson.","PeriodicalId":337132,"journal":{"name":"Focus on Language Education and Research","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The increase of student talking time as a means to optimize speaking teaching\",\"authors\":\"N. V. Nazarova\",\"doi\":\"10.35213/2686-7516-2022-3-3-50-57\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper deals with some issues concerning optimization of speaking teaching, namely the impact of Student Talking Time on students mastering of such reproductive skill as speaking. Though methodological literature does not define the exact amount of STT and Teacher Talking Time and the correlation between the two, it is noted that the relation depends to a great degree in the level of a foreign language learning. Thus on the initial level it is quite obvious that TTT accounts for a larger portion of a lesson, including teachers explanations, pronunciation drilling, correction of mistakes, introduction of new words and grammar structures. In a group with A1 students it would be reasonable that a ration between TTT and STT corresponds to 50-50 %. In groups of A2-B2 students the amount of TTT should be about 30% with STT aiming at 70%. In advanced level groups (C1-2) a teacher should strive to the ration of 10% to 90% respectively. In addition, the amount of TTT also depends on a task or assignment and a form of a lesson. \\nBesides, another important factor, i.e. Student Waiting Time (SWT) should also be taken into consideration, by this we mean, the amount of time a student waits in a group for their turn to give an oral answer. \\nThe paper presents some findings of an experiment which was conducted among 2 groups of 12 students at Samara branch of Moscow City Pedagogical University. The experiment was aimed at distinguishing the correlation between STT and SWT depending on an activity done at a lesson. It was proved that when students were asked to answer one question each their TT accounted for 12 minutes with SWT totaling at 11 minutes. When the students worked in groups of 3 and discussed 4 questions the STT increased up to 36 minutes and STW amounted at 9 minutes. When the students worked in pairs and were asked to discuss 6 question their STT was 36 minutes with SWT only 6 minutes, which showed that this form of work was the optimal. \\nThe increase of STT and reduction of SWT stimulates the students rising their satisfaction from the lesson.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Focus on Language Education and Research\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Focus on Language Education and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35213/2686-7516-2022-3-3-50-57\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on Language Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35213/2686-7516-2022-3-3-50-57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了优化口语教学的几个问题,即学生说话时间对学生掌握口语等再生技能的影响。虽然方法学文献并没有明确指出外语学习时间和教师谈话时间的确切数量以及两者之间的相关性,但值得注意的是,这种关系在很大程度上取决于外语学习的水平。因此,在最初的阶段,TTT占据了一节课的很大一部分,包括老师的解释、发音练习、错误的纠正、新单词的介绍和语法结构。在A1学生的小组中,TTT和STT之间的比例对应于50- 50%是合理的。在A2-B2组中,TTT的数量应在30%左右,STT的数量应达到70%。在高级班(C1-2)中,教师的比例应分别达到10%至90%。此外,TTT的数量也取决于任务或作业和课程的形式。此外,另一个重要的因素,即学生等待时间(SWT)也应该考虑在内,我们的意思是学生在一个小组中等待轮到他们给出口头答案的时间。本文介绍了在莫斯科城市教育大学萨马拉分校两组12名学生中进行的一项实验的一些结果。该实验旨在根据课堂上的活动来区分STT和SWT之间的相关性。事实证明,当学生每人回答一个问题时,他们的TT占12分钟,SWT总计为11分钟。当学生以3人为一组,讨论4个问题时,STT增加到36分钟,STW为9分钟。当学生两人一组,被要求讨论6个问题时,他们的STT是36分钟,而SWT只有6分钟,这表明这种形式的工作是最佳的。STT的增加和SWT的减少刺激了学生对课程的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The increase of student talking time as a means to optimize speaking teaching
The paper deals with some issues concerning optimization of speaking teaching, namely the impact of Student Talking Time on students mastering of such reproductive skill as speaking. Though methodological literature does not define the exact amount of STT and Teacher Talking Time and the correlation between the two, it is noted that the relation depends to a great degree in the level of a foreign language learning. Thus on the initial level it is quite obvious that TTT accounts for a larger portion of a lesson, including teachers explanations, pronunciation drilling, correction of mistakes, introduction of new words and grammar structures. In a group with A1 students it would be reasonable that a ration between TTT and STT corresponds to 50-50 %. In groups of A2-B2 students the amount of TTT should be about 30% with STT aiming at 70%. In advanced level groups (C1-2) a teacher should strive to the ration of 10% to 90% respectively. In addition, the amount of TTT also depends on a task or assignment and a form of a lesson. Besides, another important factor, i.e. Student Waiting Time (SWT) should also be taken into consideration, by this we mean, the amount of time a student waits in a group for their turn to give an oral answer. The paper presents some findings of an experiment which was conducted among 2 groups of 12 students at Samara branch of Moscow City Pedagogical University. The experiment was aimed at distinguishing the correlation between STT and SWT depending on an activity done at a lesson. It was proved that when students were asked to answer one question each their TT accounted for 12 minutes with SWT totaling at 11 minutes. When the students worked in groups of 3 and discussed 4 questions the STT increased up to 36 minutes and STW amounted at 9 minutes. When the students worked in pairs and were asked to discuss 6 question their STT was 36 minutes with SWT only 6 minutes, which showed that this form of work was the optimal. The increase of STT and reduction of SWT stimulates the students rising their satisfaction from the lesson.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信