中国国企的转型

F. Deng
{"title":"中国国企的转型","authors":"F. Deng","doi":"10.1080/20517483.2015.1048994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1990s China has largely adopted the Singapore SOE model, which relies on private-like corporatization and the pursuit of profit. This paper replays the political and economic chess to answer why the Singapore model was chosen. To this end, it demonstrates how the transformation through corporatization, under a newly founded legal system called the “State-Owned-Assets management,” was gradually embraced by Chinese administrative bureaucrats even though the change faced serious institutional obstacles. This article concludes with a critique of how the transformation of China's SOEs has now mutated to resemble a system of Crown property.","PeriodicalId":108655,"journal":{"name":"Peking University Law Journal","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE TRANSFORMATION OF CHINA'S SOES\",\"authors\":\"F. Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20517483.2015.1048994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the 1990s China has largely adopted the Singapore SOE model, which relies on private-like corporatization and the pursuit of profit. This paper replays the political and economic chess to answer why the Singapore model was chosen. To this end, it demonstrates how the transformation through corporatization, under a newly founded legal system called the “State-Owned-Assets management,” was gradually embraced by Chinese administrative bureaucrats even though the change faced serious institutional obstacles. This article concludes with a critique of how the transformation of China's SOEs has now mutated to resemble a system of Crown property.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peking University Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peking University Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20517483.2015.1048994\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peking University Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20517483.2015.1048994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自上世纪90年代以来,中国在很大程度上采用了新加坡的国有企业模式,这种模式依赖于类似私营的公司化和对利润的追求。本文通过政治和经济博弈来回答为什么选择新加坡模式。为此,它展示了在新建立的“国有资产管理”法律体系下,通过公司化进行的转型是如何逐渐被中国的行政官僚所接受的,尽管这种变革面临着严重的制度障碍。本文最后对中国国有企业的转型如何演变成一种类似于王室财产的制度提出了批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE TRANSFORMATION OF CHINA'S SOES
Since the 1990s China has largely adopted the Singapore SOE model, which relies on private-like corporatization and the pursuit of profit. This paper replays the political and economic chess to answer why the Singapore model was chosen. To this end, it demonstrates how the transformation through corporatization, under a newly founded legal system called the “State-Owned-Assets management,” was gradually embraced by Chinese administrative bureaucrats even though the change faced serious institutional obstacles. This article concludes with a critique of how the transformation of China's SOEs has now mutated to resemble a system of Crown property.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信