汶川7.9级地震15年后断层应力传递预测方法评价

T. Parsons, C. Ji, E. Kirby
{"title":"汶川7.9级地震15年后断层应力传递预测方法评价","authors":"T. Parsons, C. Ji, E. Kirby","doi":"10.1785/0320230021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Four days after the 12 May 2008 M 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake struck the Sichuan region of China, we submitted a prospective earthquake forecast based on transfer of stress from the mainshock onto significant faults crossing through populated areas. We identified where the largest aftershocks were likely to occur that could cause loss of life. We returned the revised article to the journal on 5 June 2008, marking the last day of our observation period. The primary testable features are locations and focal mechanisms of larger (M ≥ 4.5) earthquakes; did these events happen on or very near the faults we said they would? Did they have the same strikes, dips, and rakes as the faults we modeled? In retrospect, is the stress transfer method consistent with all M ≥ 4.5 earthquakes that occurred? We find all but one M ≥ 4.5 aftershock with known focal mechanisms located on stress-increased faults, and their focal mechanism parameters overlap with geological characteristics we used in making calculations. Six of the seven lethal M > 4.5 earthquakes that occurred in the region since 5 June 2008 were located on stress-increased faults, with the lone exception triggered by hydraulic fracturing.","PeriodicalId":273018,"journal":{"name":"The Seismic Record","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating a Prospective Fault-Based Stress-Transfer Forecast for the M 7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake Region, 15 Years Later\",\"authors\":\"T. Parsons, C. Ji, E. Kirby\",\"doi\":\"10.1785/0320230021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Four days after the 12 May 2008 M 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake struck the Sichuan region of China, we submitted a prospective earthquake forecast based on transfer of stress from the mainshock onto significant faults crossing through populated areas. We identified where the largest aftershocks were likely to occur that could cause loss of life. We returned the revised article to the journal on 5 June 2008, marking the last day of our observation period. The primary testable features are locations and focal mechanisms of larger (M ≥ 4.5) earthquakes; did these events happen on or very near the faults we said they would? Did they have the same strikes, dips, and rakes as the faults we modeled? In retrospect, is the stress transfer method consistent with all M ≥ 4.5 earthquakes that occurred? We find all but one M ≥ 4.5 aftershock with known focal mechanisms located on stress-increased faults, and their focal mechanism parameters overlap with geological characteristics we used in making calculations. Six of the seven lethal M > 4.5 earthquakes that occurred in the region since 5 June 2008 were located on stress-increased faults, with the lone exception triggered by hydraulic fracturing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Seismic Record\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Seismic Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1785/0320230021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Seismic Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0320230021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2008年5月12日汶川7.9级地震袭击中国四川地区4天后,我们提交了一份基于主震向穿越人口稠密地区的重要断层传递应力的前瞻性地震预报。我们确定了可能发生最大余震的地方,这可能会造成生命损失。我们于2008年6月5日,也就是我们观察期的最后一天,将修改后的文章退回给杂志。主要可测特征是较大地震(M≥4.5)的位置和震源机制;这些事件发生在我们所说的断层上或离断层很近吗?它们是否有与我们模拟的断层相同的走向、倾斜和倾斜?回想起来,应力传递方法是否与所有发生的4.5级以上地震一致?我们发现除了一次M≥4.5级余震外,其余余震的震源机制都位于应力增加的断层上,它们的震源机制参数与我们在计算中使用的地质特征重叠。自2008年6月5日以来,该地区发生的7次致命的5.5级地震中,有6次位于应力增加的断层上,唯一的例外是由水力压裂引发的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating a Prospective Fault-Based Stress-Transfer Forecast for the M 7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake Region, 15 Years Later
Four days after the 12 May 2008 M 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake struck the Sichuan region of China, we submitted a prospective earthquake forecast based on transfer of stress from the mainshock onto significant faults crossing through populated areas. We identified where the largest aftershocks were likely to occur that could cause loss of life. We returned the revised article to the journal on 5 June 2008, marking the last day of our observation period. The primary testable features are locations and focal mechanisms of larger (M ≥ 4.5) earthquakes; did these events happen on or very near the faults we said they would? Did they have the same strikes, dips, and rakes as the faults we modeled? In retrospect, is the stress transfer method consistent with all M ≥ 4.5 earthquakes that occurred? We find all but one M ≥ 4.5 aftershock with known focal mechanisms located on stress-increased faults, and their focal mechanism parameters overlap with geological characteristics we used in making calculations. Six of the seven lethal M > 4.5 earthquakes that occurred in the region since 5 June 2008 were located on stress-increased faults, with the lone exception triggered by hydraulic fracturing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信