{"title":"Adam Gurowski i Henryk Rzewuski. Dwa oblicza zdrady narodowej w polskiej myśli romantycznej","authors":"J. Nowak","doi":"10.11649/sn.2010.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adam Gurowski and Henryk Rzewuski: Two Faces of National Betrayal in Polish Romantic ThoughtThe term “national betrayal” had different meanings during the Partitions period in the history of Poland in the 18th and 19th centuries. However, despite evident temporal, spatial, and cultural discrepancies, “the ‘betrayal’ of the nation” has so far been categorized in rigid, dichotomous ways but should allow for more relativity as follows. Purposeful betrayal of national interests is motivated mostly by the traitor’s wish to advance his own career, his social or material status. The betrayal of the nation can also result from fear of political repression for the activist’s deeds or targeted secret services operations against him. However, there were also cases of “tactical” betrayal in Poland so as to show indirect cooperation with the partitioning powers, as a compromise with the ultimate aim to obtain Polish independence. But the most intriguing case is national betrayal based on ideological grounds: the conviction that the universal idea is superior to the national one. This involves resignation from independence due to an ideological assumption which is against the nation’s aspirations.Given this general background the author of the essay discusses two different cases of national betrayal, that of Adam Gurowski and Henryk Rzewuski. The former gave up the Polish national idea as well as the Polish language, customs and culture and Catholic religion altogether, with the aim of creating a complete Polish-Russian union. He fully believed in the benefits of Slavic unity under the leadership of Russia. Rzewuski on the other hand, though also denying the Polish national idea, did not fully reject the Polish language and culture: in his view Polish language and culture should develop as a local culture and dialect in Russia, only partially identified with the state of the Tsars. As a result of this change, the Poles should accept only limited Russian influence. For Rzewuski, the Poles as part of the powerful union with the Russians could preserve their own economy and local dialect, despite the fact that Russian would become their official language.","PeriodicalId":227603,"journal":{"name":"Sprawy Narodowościowe","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sprawy Narodowościowe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11649/sn.2010.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Adam Gurowski和Henryk Rzewuski:波兰浪漫主义思想中民族背叛的两种面貌在18世纪和19世纪波兰历史上的瓜分时期,“民族背叛”一词有不同的含义。然而,尽管存在明显的时间、空间和文化差异,“对国家的‘背叛’”迄今为止被严格地分为两类,但应该允许更多的相对性如下。有目的的背叛国家利益的动机主要是为了提升自己的事业、社会或物质地位。对国家的背叛也可能是由于担心活动人士的行为会受到政治镇压,或秘密机构针对他采取了有针对性的行动。然而,在波兰也有“战术”背叛的情况,以表明与瓜分国的间接合作,作为最终目的是获得波兰独立的妥协。但最有趣的案例是基于意识形态基础的国家背叛:坚信普遍理念优于国家理念。这包括由于违背国家愿望的意识形态假设而放弃独立。在这样的大背景下,本文的作者讨论了两个不同的国家背叛案例,亚当·古罗夫斯基和亨利克·热乌斯基。前者完全放弃了波兰的民族观念、波兰语、习俗、文化和天主教,目的是建立一个完整的波兰-俄罗斯联盟。他完全相信在俄国领导下的斯拉夫统一的好处。另一方面,热乌斯基虽然也否认波兰民族观念,但并没有完全排斥波兰语言和文化:在他看来,波兰语言和文化应该作为俄罗斯的一种地方文化和方言发展,只是部分地认同于沙皇的国家。由于这种变化,波兰人应该只接受俄罗斯有限的影响。对热乌斯基来说,波兰人作为俄罗斯强大联盟的一部分,可以保留自己的经济和当地方言,尽管俄语将成为他们的官方语言。
Adam Gurowski i Henryk Rzewuski. Dwa oblicza zdrady narodowej w polskiej myśli romantycznej
Adam Gurowski and Henryk Rzewuski: Two Faces of National Betrayal in Polish Romantic ThoughtThe term “national betrayal” had different meanings during the Partitions period in the history of Poland in the 18th and 19th centuries. However, despite evident temporal, spatial, and cultural discrepancies, “the ‘betrayal’ of the nation” has so far been categorized in rigid, dichotomous ways but should allow for more relativity as follows. Purposeful betrayal of national interests is motivated mostly by the traitor’s wish to advance his own career, his social or material status. The betrayal of the nation can also result from fear of political repression for the activist’s deeds or targeted secret services operations against him. However, there were also cases of “tactical” betrayal in Poland so as to show indirect cooperation with the partitioning powers, as a compromise with the ultimate aim to obtain Polish independence. But the most intriguing case is national betrayal based on ideological grounds: the conviction that the universal idea is superior to the national one. This involves resignation from independence due to an ideological assumption which is against the nation’s aspirations.Given this general background the author of the essay discusses two different cases of national betrayal, that of Adam Gurowski and Henryk Rzewuski. The former gave up the Polish national idea as well as the Polish language, customs and culture and Catholic religion altogether, with the aim of creating a complete Polish-Russian union. He fully believed in the benefits of Slavic unity under the leadership of Russia. Rzewuski on the other hand, though also denying the Polish national idea, did not fully reject the Polish language and culture: in his view Polish language and culture should develop as a local culture and dialect in Russia, only partially identified with the state of the Tsars. As a result of this change, the Poles should accept only limited Russian influence. For Rzewuski, the Poles as part of the powerful union with the Russians could preserve their own economy and local dialect, despite the fact that Russian would become their official language.