高校地理教育的区域化问题

{"title":"高校地理教育的区域化问题","authors":"","doi":"10.26565/2075-1893-2019-29-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to draw attention to some uncoordinated issues in domestic geographic education, namely the differences in approaches to the regional tourism division of Ukraine and the world, the assignment of individual countries to macroregions, which contradicts the geographical approach, makes it diffi cult for students to perceive, affects the quality of their knowledge.\n\nThe main material. The disciplines «Tourist geography of Ukraine», «Geography of tourism of Ukraine», «Geography of tourism», «Recreational geography», «Tourist local history» are basic in the cycle of professional training of specialists, bachelors of the specialty «Tourism». They often trace the use of the same conceptual apparatus, the rationale for various provisions, criteria that are the basis for regional zoning.\nThe analysis and synthesis of the scientists’ approaches carried out by the author has found significant differences in identifying tourist and recreational regions, grouping of countries, typology, and gradations of taxonomic units. The proposed schemes of tourist regionalization of the territory of Ukraine and the world differ in their approaches to the substantiation of district-forming factors, and accordingly, the number, names and borders of the selected regions. Sometimes «liberties» are allowed in the definition and operation of the conceptual apparatus. This distinguishes informational presentation, causes confusion, time spending, not inducing the integrity of the world perception.\n\nConclusions and further research. According to the experience of teaching these disciplines, the dependence of the quality of knowledge and skills of students on the degree of integration of the content, forms and methods of instruction has been revealed. The necessity to observe the spatial-geographical approach in regionalization is grounded. The proposed measures will be useful in the formation of future specialists’ competence based on the integration of academic disciplines. The practical signifi cance of this scientific problem is seen in the development of uniform standards for curricula and programs; methodological manuals and recommendations on integration issues in geographical education; respecting the paradigm in the preparation of textbooks and teaching aids, as well as in the process of teaching the relevant disciplines. The study does not exhaust all aspects of the problem and indicates the need for its further development, clarification of teaching methods of various integrated courses, the use of integrated technologies.","PeriodicalId":189250,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Education and Cartography","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problematics of regionalization in geographical education of higher educational institutions\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.26565/2075-1893-2019-29-04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this article is to draw attention to some uncoordinated issues in domestic geographic education, namely the differences in approaches to the regional tourism division of Ukraine and the world, the assignment of individual countries to macroregions, which contradicts the geographical approach, makes it diffi cult for students to perceive, affects the quality of their knowledge.\\n\\nThe main material. The disciplines «Tourist geography of Ukraine», «Geography of tourism of Ukraine», «Geography of tourism», «Recreational geography», «Tourist local history» are basic in the cycle of professional training of specialists, bachelors of the specialty «Tourism». They often trace the use of the same conceptual apparatus, the rationale for various provisions, criteria that are the basis for regional zoning.\\nThe analysis and synthesis of the scientists’ approaches carried out by the author has found significant differences in identifying tourist and recreational regions, grouping of countries, typology, and gradations of taxonomic units. The proposed schemes of tourist regionalization of the territory of Ukraine and the world differ in their approaches to the substantiation of district-forming factors, and accordingly, the number, names and borders of the selected regions. Sometimes «liberties» are allowed in the definition and operation of the conceptual apparatus. This distinguishes informational presentation, causes confusion, time spending, not inducing the integrity of the world perception.\\n\\nConclusions and further research. According to the experience of teaching these disciplines, the dependence of the quality of knowledge and skills of students on the degree of integration of the content, forms and methods of instruction has been revealed. The necessity to observe the spatial-geographical approach in regionalization is grounded. The proposed measures will be useful in the formation of future specialists’ competence based on the integration of academic disciplines. The practical signifi cance of this scientific problem is seen in the development of uniform standards for curricula and programs; methodological manuals and recommendations on integration issues in geographical education; respecting the paradigm in the preparation of textbooks and teaching aids, as well as in the process of teaching the relevant disciplines. The study does not exhaust all aspects of the problem and indicates the need for its further development, clarification of teaching methods of various integrated courses, the use of integrated technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geographical Education and Cartography\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geographical Education and Cartography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-1893-2019-29-04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Education and Cartography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-1893-2019-29-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的在于引起人们对国内地理教育中存在的一些不协调问题的关注,即乌克兰与世界区域旅游划分方法的差异,个别国家对宏观区域的分配,这些都与地理方法相矛盾,使学生难以感知,影响其知识质量。主要材料。“乌克兰旅游地理学”、“乌克兰旅游地理学”、“旅游地理学”、“休闲地理学”、“旅游地方历史”等学科是“旅游”专业学士学位专家专业培训周期的基础。它们经常追溯到使用相同的概念工具,各种规定的理由,作为区域分区基础的标准。作者对科学家们的方法进行了分析和综合,发现在确定旅游和休闲地区、国家分组、类型和分类单位等级方面存在显著差异。拟议的乌克兰和世界旅游区域化计划在确定地区形成因素的方法上有所不同,因此在选定地区的数量、名称和边界上也有所不同。有时在概念装置的定义和操作中允许“自由”。这区分了信息的呈现,造成混乱,耗费时间,不诱导对世界的完整感知。结论及进一步研究。根据这些学科的教学经验,揭示了学生的知识和技能质量取决于教学内容、教学形式和教学方法的整合程度。在区划中遵循空间地理方法的必要性是有根据的。建议的措施将有助于在学科整合的基础上形成未来的专家能力。这一科学问题的实际意义体现在制定统一的课程和项目标准;关于地理教育一体化问题的方法手册和建议;在教材和教具的编写以及相关学科的教学过程中尊重范式。该研究并未穷尽问题的所有方面,并指出需要进一步发展,澄清各种综合课程的教学方法,使用综合技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problematics of regionalization in geographical education of higher educational institutions
The purpose of this article is to draw attention to some uncoordinated issues in domestic geographic education, namely the differences in approaches to the regional tourism division of Ukraine and the world, the assignment of individual countries to macroregions, which contradicts the geographical approach, makes it diffi cult for students to perceive, affects the quality of their knowledge. The main material. The disciplines «Tourist geography of Ukraine», «Geography of tourism of Ukraine», «Geography of tourism», «Recreational geography», «Tourist local history» are basic in the cycle of professional training of specialists, bachelors of the specialty «Tourism». They often trace the use of the same conceptual apparatus, the rationale for various provisions, criteria that are the basis for regional zoning. The analysis and synthesis of the scientists’ approaches carried out by the author has found significant differences in identifying tourist and recreational regions, grouping of countries, typology, and gradations of taxonomic units. The proposed schemes of tourist regionalization of the territory of Ukraine and the world differ in their approaches to the substantiation of district-forming factors, and accordingly, the number, names and borders of the selected regions. Sometimes «liberties» are allowed in the definition and operation of the conceptual apparatus. This distinguishes informational presentation, causes confusion, time spending, not inducing the integrity of the world perception. Conclusions and further research. According to the experience of teaching these disciplines, the dependence of the quality of knowledge and skills of students on the degree of integration of the content, forms and methods of instruction has been revealed. The necessity to observe the spatial-geographical approach in regionalization is grounded. The proposed measures will be useful in the formation of future specialists’ competence based on the integration of academic disciplines. The practical signifi cance of this scientific problem is seen in the development of uniform standards for curricula and programs; methodological manuals and recommendations on integration issues in geographical education; respecting the paradigm in the preparation of textbooks and teaching aids, as well as in the process of teaching the relevant disciplines. The study does not exhaust all aspects of the problem and indicates the need for its further development, clarification of teaching methods of various integrated courses, the use of integrated technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信