机械诊断和治疗患者的四肢问题:系统回顾

Dr. Mrudula Shete (PT), Dr. Deepak Anap (PT)
{"title":"机械诊断和治疗患者的四肢问题:系统回顾","authors":"Dr. Mrudula Shete (PT), Dr. Deepak Anap (PT)","doi":"10.46858/vimsjpt.3210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) is used in the treatment of extremity problems. It is an effective approach in cases of spinal conditions for target population. Availability of the reliable data like RCT and systematic review is a key factor to determine the precise clinical problem and to direct an appropriate intervention.\nObjectives: The primary aim of this systematic review is to assess the methodological quality of well-designed RCTs related to the MDT classification and treatment for extremity problems.\n Design: Systematic review.\n Method: Electronic search on various data bases was done. The level of evidence was determined considering the methodological quality of the studies.\nResults: 1 RCT was included and it met the criteria for high quality. After the assessment of RCT according to the CONSORT guidelines it was found that out of 25 checklist points; 4 methodological faults were found in assessed RCT. Those were; a) sample size determination, b) Blinding after assessment c) Generisability of the trial findings d) Where the full trial protocol can be accessed.\nConclusion: The current systematic review found strong evidence of benefits of MDT approach for extremity problems (knee joint). But there was limited evidence in other extremity joints.","PeriodicalId":284305,"journal":{"name":"VIMS JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical diagnosis and therapy in patients with extremity problems: A Systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Dr. Mrudula Shete (PT), Dr. Deepak Anap (PT)\",\"doi\":\"10.46858/vimsjpt.3210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) is used in the treatment of extremity problems. It is an effective approach in cases of spinal conditions for target population. Availability of the reliable data like RCT and systematic review is a key factor to determine the precise clinical problem and to direct an appropriate intervention.\\nObjectives: The primary aim of this systematic review is to assess the methodological quality of well-designed RCTs related to the MDT classification and treatment for extremity problems.\\n Design: Systematic review.\\n Method: Electronic search on various data bases was done. The level of evidence was determined considering the methodological quality of the studies.\\nResults: 1 RCT was included and it met the criteria for high quality. After the assessment of RCT according to the CONSORT guidelines it was found that out of 25 checklist points; 4 methodological faults were found in assessed RCT. Those were; a) sample size determination, b) Blinding after assessment c) Generisability of the trial findings d) Where the full trial protocol can be accessed.\\nConclusion: The current systematic review found strong evidence of benefits of MDT approach for extremity problems (knee joint). But there was limited evidence in other extremity joints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VIMS JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VIMS JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46858/vimsjpt.3210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VIMS JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46858/vimsjpt.3210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:机械诊断和治疗(MDT)用于治疗四肢问题。这是一种有效的方法,在情况下脊柱条件的目标人群。可靠的数据如随机对照试验和系统评价的可用性是确定确切的临床问题和指导适当干预的关键因素。目的:本系统综述的主要目的是评估与MDT分类和四肢问题治疗相关的精心设计的随机对照试验的方法学质量。设计:系统回顾。方法:对各种数据库进行电子检索。证据水平是根据研究的方法学质量来确定的。结果:纳入1项RCT,符合高质量标准。根据CONSORT指南对RCT进行评估后发现,在25个检查点中;在评估的RCT中发现4个方法学错误。这些都是;a)样本量的确定,b)评估后的盲法,c)试验结果的可推广性,d)可获取完整试验方案的地方。结论:目前的系统综述发现了MDT入路对四肢问题(膝关节)有益的有力证据。但在其他肢体关节上的证据有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanical diagnosis and therapy in patients with extremity problems: A Systematic review
Background: Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) is used in the treatment of extremity problems. It is an effective approach in cases of spinal conditions for target population. Availability of the reliable data like RCT and systematic review is a key factor to determine the precise clinical problem and to direct an appropriate intervention. Objectives: The primary aim of this systematic review is to assess the methodological quality of well-designed RCTs related to the MDT classification and treatment for extremity problems.  Design: Systematic review.  Method: Electronic search on various data bases was done. The level of evidence was determined considering the methodological quality of the studies. Results: 1 RCT was included and it met the criteria for high quality. After the assessment of RCT according to the CONSORT guidelines it was found that out of 25 checklist points; 4 methodological faults were found in assessed RCT. Those were; a) sample size determination, b) Blinding after assessment c) Generisability of the trial findings d) Where the full trial protocol can be accessed. Conclusion: The current systematic review found strong evidence of benefits of MDT approach for extremity problems (knee joint). But there was limited evidence in other extremity joints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信