{"title":"瑞典语被动谓语的主谓题结构研究","authors":"Rickard Ramhöj","doi":"10.21248/hpsg.2016.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis paper concerns the argument structure analysis of\nraising-to-subject with passive predicates in Swedish and other\nGermanic languages. Support is given for the analysis in which the\nraising-to-subject construction constitutes a regular passive, the\npassive counterpart of active raising-to-object. The fact that there\ndoes not seem to be an active counterpart for certain predicates, such\nas the predicate say, as well as the fact that raising-to-subject does\nnot seem to be possible with the periphrastic passive in Swedish is\nattributed to certain semantic restrictions on the raising-to-object\nconstruction and the periphrastic passive construction, respectively.","PeriodicalId":388937,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the argument structure of raising-to-subject with passive predicates in Swedish\",\"authors\":\"Rickard Ramhöj\",\"doi\":\"10.21248/hpsg.2016.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis paper concerns the argument structure analysis of\\nraising-to-subject with passive predicates in Swedish and other\\nGermanic languages. Support is given for the analysis in which the\\nraising-to-subject construction constitutes a regular passive, the\\npassive counterpart of active raising-to-object. The fact that there\\ndoes not seem to be an active counterpart for certain predicates, such\\nas the predicate say, as well as the fact that raising-to-subject does\\nnot seem to be possible with the periphrastic passive in Swedish is\\nattributed to certain semantic restrictions on the raising-to-object\\nconstruction and the periphrastic passive construction, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2016.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2016.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the argument structure of raising-to-subject with passive predicates in Swedish
This paper concerns the argument structure analysis of
raising-to-subject with passive predicates in Swedish and other
Germanic languages. Support is given for the analysis in which the
raising-to-subject construction constitutes a regular passive, the
passive counterpart of active raising-to-object. The fact that there
does not seem to be an active counterpart for certain predicates, such
as the predicate say, as well as the fact that raising-to-subject does
not seem to be possible with the periphrastic passive in Swedish is
attributed to certain semantic restrictions on the raising-to-object
construction and the periphrastic passive construction, respectively.