{"title":"基因指纹和专业知识的局限性","authors":"Clotilde Bricot (Doctorante contractuelle)","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2023.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The DNA is now seen as irrefutable proof, both by actors on the ground and by civil society in general, especially in criminal matters. Nevertheless, although it's valuable in some cases, the DNA evidence cannot be described as infallible. It has many limitations, in particular as regards fundamental freedoms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2023 183","pages":"Pages 101-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Les empreintes génétiques et les limites de l’expertise\",\"authors\":\"Clotilde Bricot (Doctorante contractuelle)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meddro.2023.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The DNA is now seen as irrefutable proof, both by actors on the ground and by civil society in general, especially in criminal matters. Nevertheless, although it's valuable in some cases, the DNA evidence cannot be described as infallible. It has many limitations, in particular as regards fundamental freedoms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"volume\":\"2023 183\",\"pages\":\"Pages 101-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739123000386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739123000386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Les empreintes génétiques et les limites de l’expertise
The DNA is now seen as irrefutable proof, both by actors on the ground and by civil society in general, especially in criminal matters. Nevertheless, although it's valuable in some cases, the DNA evidence cannot be described as infallible. It has many limitations, in particular as regards fundamental freedoms.
期刊介绍:
The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues