硬膜外布比卡因与TAP阻滞对全子宫切除术术后疼痛缓解的比较

S. Hassan, Muhammad Amim Anwar, Syed Nouman Ahmed, Aqil Qayyum, M. Arshed
{"title":"硬膜外布比卡因与TAP阻滞对全子宫切除术术后疼痛缓解的比较","authors":"S. Hassan, Muhammad Amim Anwar, Syed Nouman Ahmed, Aqil Qayyum, M. Arshed","doi":"10.53350/pjmhs221610230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anesthesia is essential in the treatment of postoperative pain. Epidural analgesia and trans versus abdominis plane (TAP) block are possible options for analgesia for abdominal surgery. Objective: The main objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of epidural bupivacaine and trans versus abdominus plane (TAP) block to provide better post-operative pain relief in total abdominal hysterectomy. Study design and place of study: This study was a prospective randomized control trial conducted at Department of anesthesiology, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi for the period July 2017- July, 2018. Methods: Total 101 patients were enrolled thorough pre anesthetic assessment before surgery and an informed and written consent was obtained. Patients were allocated in group A and B after taking all ASA monitoring, participants in group A had an epidural catheter passed while Group B patients were given transversus abdominis plane block intra-operatively. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was used to assess anxiety levels. Statistical test like the chi-square test was used, with a p-value of 0.05 being considered statistically significant Results: Total 101 participants enrolled, the average age was 45.48 ± 1.06 (Age Rang 30-60years). The mean age of patient in Epidural Group was 47.02± 7.62 as ccompared with TAP Block Group was 43.56± 13.35 with p-value 0.007. Majority of the patients has ASA II, 39(61.9%) and 24(38.1%) respectively with p-value 0.240. Pain score at 10 minutes in epidural and TAP Block was reported as 2.16±2.1o and 3.0±2.94 (mild pain) with p-value 0.000 while after 6 hours, the VAS pain score showed mild pain in epidural group as 1.96±1.67 but moderate to severe pain was observed in TAP block patients as 4.28±1.56 with insignificant p-value 0.162. Study findings will help care taker staff for Post-Operative Pain Relief after the surgery , the benefits of single shot TAP block could be of advantage in situations where epidural analgesia is contraindicated or not desired. Conclusion: The study concluded better pain relief in patients with epidural bupivacaine when compared with TAP block. Keywords: TAP Transversus Abdominus Plane ASA Physical Status Score VAS Visual Analogue Scale Epidural block, postoperative pain relief, Total Abdominal Hysterectomy, Transversus Abdominis Plane Block","PeriodicalId":296492,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison between the Post-Operative Pain Relief in Total Hystrectomy with Epidural Bupivacaine and TAP Block\",\"authors\":\"S. Hassan, Muhammad Amim Anwar, Syed Nouman Ahmed, Aqil Qayyum, M. Arshed\",\"doi\":\"10.53350/pjmhs221610230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Anesthesia is essential in the treatment of postoperative pain. Epidural analgesia and trans versus abdominis plane (TAP) block are possible options for analgesia for abdominal surgery. Objective: The main objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of epidural bupivacaine and trans versus abdominus plane (TAP) block to provide better post-operative pain relief in total abdominal hysterectomy. Study design and place of study: This study was a prospective randomized control trial conducted at Department of anesthesiology, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi for the period July 2017- July, 2018. Methods: Total 101 patients were enrolled thorough pre anesthetic assessment before surgery and an informed and written consent was obtained. Patients were allocated in group A and B after taking all ASA monitoring, participants in group A had an epidural catheter passed while Group B patients were given transversus abdominis plane block intra-operatively. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was used to assess anxiety levels. Statistical test like the chi-square test was used, with a p-value of 0.05 being considered statistically significant Results: Total 101 participants enrolled, the average age was 45.48 ± 1.06 (Age Rang 30-60years). The mean age of patient in Epidural Group was 47.02± 7.62 as ccompared with TAP Block Group was 43.56± 13.35 with p-value 0.007. Majority of the patients has ASA II, 39(61.9%) and 24(38.1%) respectively with p-value 0.240. Pain score at 10 minutes in epidural and TAP Block was reported as 2.16±2.1o and 3.0±2.94 (mild pain) with p-value 0.000 while after 6 hours, the VAS pain score showed mild pain in epidural group as 1.96±1.67 but moderate to severe pain was observed in TAP block patients as 4.28±1.56 with insignificant p-value 0.162. Study findings will help care taker staff for Post-Operative Pain Relief after the surgery , the benefits of single shot TAP block could be of advantage in situations where epidural analgesia is contraindicated or not desired. Conclusion: The study concluded better pain relief in patients with epidural bupivacaine when compared with TAP block. Keywords: TAP Transversus Abdominus Plane ASA Physical Status Score VAS Visual Analogue Scale Epidural block, postoperative pain relief, Total Abdominal Hysterectomy, Transversus Abdominis Plane Block\",\"PeriodicalId\":296492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs221610230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs221610230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:麻醉在术后疼痛的治疗中是必不可少的。硬膜外镇痛和经腹平面阻滞(TAP)是腹部手术镇痛的可能选择。目的:本研究的主要目的是评价和比较硬膜外布比卡因和经腹平面阻滞(TAP)在全腹子宫切除术中提供更好的术后疼痛缓解效果。研究设计和研究地点:本研究是一项前瞻性随机对照试验,于2017年7月至2018年7月在卡拉奇Liaquat国立医院麻醉科进行。方法:101例患者在手术前进行全面的麻醉前评估,并获得知情的书面同意。在完成全部ASA监测后,将患者分为A组和B组,A组患者术中行硬膜外置管,B组患者术中行横腹平面阻滞。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分来评估焦虑水平。采用卡方检验等统计学检验,p值为0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:共入组101例,平均年龄45.48±1.06岁(年龄范围30 ~ 60岁)。硬膜外组患者平均年龄为47.02±7.62岁,TAP阻滞组为43.56±13.35岁,p值为0.007。多数患者为ASA II型,分别为39例(61.9%)和24例(38.1%),p值为0.240。硬膜外阻滞组和TAP阻滞组10 min疼痛评分分别为2.16±2.10和3.0±2.94(轻度疼痛),p值为0.000;6 h后VAS疼痛评分:硬膜外组轻度疼痛为1.96±1.67,TAP阻滞组中至重度疼痛为4.28±1.56,p值为0.162,差异无统计学意义。研究结果将有助于护理人员术后疼痛缓解,在硬膜外镇痛禁忌或不需要的情况下,单针TAP阻滞的好处可能是有利的。结论:与TAP阻滞相比,硬膜外布比卡因能更好地缓解患者的疼痛。关键词:TAP腹横平面ASA身体状态评分VAS视觉模拟量表硬膜外阻滞,术后疼痛缓解,全腹子宫切除术,腹横平面阻滞
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison between the Post-Operative Pain Relief in Total Hystrectomy with Epidural Bupivacaine and TAP Block
Background: Anesthesia is essential in the treatment of postoperative pain. Epidural analgesia and trans versus abdominis plane (TAP) block are possible options for analgesia for abdominal surgery. Objective: The main objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of epidural bupivacaine and trans versus abdominus plane (TAP) block to provide better post-operative pain relief in total abdominal hysterectomy. Study design and place of study: This study was a prospective randomized control trial conducted at Department of anesthesiology, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi for the period July 2017- July, 2018. Methods: Total 101 patients were enrolled thorough pre anesthetic assessment before surgery and an informed and written consent was obtained. Patients were allocated in group A and B after taking all ASA monitoring, participants in group A had an epidural catheter passed while Group B patients were given transversus abdominis plane block intra-operatively. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was used to assess anxiety levels. Statistical test like the chi-square test was used, with a p-value of 0.05 being considered statistically significant Results: Total 101 participants enrolled, the average age was 45.48 ± 1.06 (Age Rang 30-60years). The mean age of patient in Epidural Group was 47.02± 7.62 as ccompared with TAP Block Group was 43.56± 13.35 with p-value 0.007. Majority of the patients has ASA II, 39(61.9%) and 24(38.1%) respectively with p-value 0.240. Pain score at 10 minutes in epidural and TAP Block was reported as 2.16±2.1o and 3.0±2.94 (mild pain) with p-value 0.000 while after 6 hours, the VAS pain score showed mild pain in epidural group as 1.96±1.67 but moderate to severe pain was observed in TAP block patients as 4.28±1.56 with insignificant p-value 0.162. Study findings will help care taker staff for Post-Operative Pain Relief after the surgery , the benefits of single shot TAP block could be of advantage in situations where epidural analgesia is contraindicated or not desired. Conclusion: The study concluded better pain relief in patients with epidural bupivacaine when compared with TAP block. Keywords: TAP Transversus Abdominus Plane ASA Physical Status Score VAS Visual Analogue Scale Epidural block, postoperative pain relief, Total Abdominal Hysterectomy, Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信