加扎马大学医学院护理科学研究项目的尿理测验

Hershinta Retno, Intan Nurjannah
{"title":"加扎马大学医学院护理科学研究项目的尿理测验","authors":"Hershinta Retno, Intan Nurjannah","doi":"10.22146/jkkk.44278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is one of summative test method for performance-based assessment. One of component that make up an OSCE is assessment instrumen. Whereas checklist is one of OSCE’s component that affect OSCE’s reliability. As long as this checklist was implemented in Nursing Science Program, Faculty of Medicine, UGM, the reliability of urinary catheterization checklist hasn’t been testedObjective: This study aims to assess interrater reliability of OSCE checklist instruments for urinary catheterization in Nursing Science Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada.Methods: This study is a psychometric testing study. Two rater consisted of a fourth-year student and a lecturer who performed measurement on 93 second-year students who was taking the OSCE examination. The measurement result were analyzed using kappa test and percent agreement (PA). Whereas the item’s reliability were analyzed using weighted kappa dan some items which is paradox can be count with Prevalence and Bias Adjusted Kappa-Ordinal Scale (PABAK-OS) to separate the bias and prevalence effect.Results: The results of measurement of the reliability was 0,57, which indicated that the checklist was in the moderate category, and the PA was 78,49%. According to Osborne (2008) and Stemler and Tsai (2008), this checklist reliability considered as acceptable. Meanwhile, the result of measurement of each item indicated various reliabilities. Reliability value on this checklist’s item was around 0,24-0,96. Meanwhile, some factors that affect OSCE’s rating categorized as item and rater.Conclusion: The checklist of urinary catheterization has moderate reliability value and can be used as an instrument for the OSCE assessment. However, there were 9 items that weren’t reliable and must be improved. ABSTRAKLatar belakang: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) merupakan salah satu metode penilaian sumatif dalam penilaian berbasis performa. Salah satu komponen yang menyusun OSCE adalah instrumen penilaian. Instrumen checklist merupakan komponen OSCE yang mempengaruhi reliabilitas penilaian tersebut. Selama diterapkan di PSIK FK UGM, reliabilitas checklist kateterisasi urin belum pernah diuji.Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui interrater reliability checklist OSCE kateterisasi urin di Program Studi Ilmu Keperawatan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada.Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian psikometri. Dua rater yang terdiri dari mahasiswa tingkat  4 dan seorang dosen menilai performa 93 mahasiswa tahun kedua dalam stase kateterisasi urin saat OSCE. Hasil pengukuran akan dihitung dan diuji menggunakan uji kappa dan Percent Agreement (PA). Sedangkan reliabilitas tiap item kateterisasi urin akan dihitung dengan menggunakan weighted kappa, dan beberapa item yang mengalami paradoks akan dihitung menggunakan Prevalence And Bias Adjusted Kappa-Ordinal Scale (PABAK-OS) untuk menghilangkan efek bias dan prevalensi.Hasil: Hasil dari penghitungan nilai kappa menunjukkan bahwa checklist kateterisasi urin memiliki nilai kappa sebesar 0,57, dan PA sebesar 78,49%. Sedangkan pengukuran item menunjukkan hasil yang bervariasi. Nilai kappa item berada pada kisaran 0,24-0,96. Adapun faktor yang mempengaruhi penilaian OSCE dapat dilihat dari sudut pandang item maupun rater.Kesimpulan: Checklist kateterisasi urin merupakan checklist dengan kategori reliabilitas sedang dan merupakan ceklis yang reliabel. Namun, terdapat 9 item pada checklist tersebut yang memerlukan perbaikan karena reliabilitasnya tidak dapat diterima.","PeriodicalId":287362,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Keperawatan Klinis dan Komunitas","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interrater Reliability Checklist Osce Kateterisasi Urin Di Program Studi Ilmu Keperawatan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada\",\"authors\":\"Hershinta Retno, Intan Nurjannah\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/jkkk.44278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is one of summative test method for performance-based assessment. One of component that make up an OSCE is assessment instrumen. Whereas checklist is one of OSCE’s component that affect OSCE’s reliability. As long as this checklist was implemented in Nursing Science Program, Faculty of Medicine, UGM, the reliability of urinary catheterization checklist hasn’t been testedObjective: This study aims to assess interrater reliability of OSCE checklist instruments for urinary catheterization in Nursing Science Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada.Methods: This study is a psychometric testing study. Two rater consisted of a fourth-year student and a lecturer who performed measurement on 93 second-year students who was taking the OSCE examination. The measurement result were analyzed using kappa test and percent agreement (PA). Whereas the item’s reliability were analyzed using weighted kappa dan some items which is paradox can be count with Prevalence and Bias Adjusted Kappa-Ordinal Scale (PABAK-OS) to separate the bias and prevalence effect.Results: The results of measurement of the reliability was 0,57, which indicated that the checklist was in the moderate category, and the PA was 78,49%. According to Osborne (2008) and Stemler and Tsai (2008), this checklist reliability considered as acceptable. Meanwhile, the result of measurement of each item indicated various reliabilities. Reliability value on this checklist’s item was around 0,24-0,96. Meanwhile, some factors that affect OSCE’s rating categorized as item and rater.Conclusion: The checklist of urinary catheterization has moderate reliability value and can be used as an instrument for the OSCE assessment. However, there were 9 items that weren’t reliable and must be improved. ABSTRAKLatar belakang: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) merupakan salah satu metode penilaian sumatif dalam penilaian berbasis performa. Salah satu komponen yang menyusun OSCE adalah instrumen penilaian. Instrumen checklist merupakan komponen OSCE yang mempengaruhi reliabilitas penilaian tersebut. Selama diterapkan di PSIK FK UGM, reliabilitas checklist kateterisasi urin belum pernah diuji.Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui interrater reliability checklist OSCE kateterisasi urin di Program Studi Ilmu Keperawatan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada.Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian psikometri. Dua rater yang terdiri dari mahasiswa tingkat  4 dan seorang dosen menilai performa 93 mahasiswa tahun kedua dalam stase kateterisasi urin saat OSCE. Hasil pengukuran akan dihitung dan diuji menggunakan uji kappa dan Percent Agreement (PA). Sedangkan reliabilitas tiap item kateterisasi urin akan dihitung dengan menggunakan weighted kappa, dan beberapa item yang mengalami paradoks akan dihitung menggunakan Prevalence And Bias Adjusted Kappa-Ordinal Scale (PABAK-OS) untuk menghilangkan efek bias dan prevalensi.Hasil: Hasil dari penghitungan nilai kappa menunjukkan bahwa checklist kateterisasi urin memiliki nilai kappa sebesar 0,57, dan PA sebesar 78,49%. Sedangkan pengukuran item menunjukkan hasil yang bervariasi. Nilai kappa item berada pada kisaran 0,24-0,96. Adapun faktor yang mempengaruhi penilaian OSCE dapat dilihat dari sudut pandang item maupun rater.Kesimpulan: Checklist kateterisasi urin merupakan checklist dengan kategori reliabilitas sedang dan merupakan ceklis yang reliabel. Namun, terdapat 9 item pada checklist tersebut yang memerlukan perbaikan karena reliabilitasnya tidak dapat diterima.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Keperawatan Klinis dan Komunitas\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Keperawatan Klinis dan Komunitas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/jkkk.44278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Keperawatan Klinis dan Komunitas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jkkk.44278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的结构化临床检查(OSCE)是绩效评价的总结性检验方法之一。欧安组织的组成部分之一是评估工具。而核对表是影响欧安组织可靠性的重要组成部分之一。自从该检查表在UGM医学院护理科学专业实施以来,一直没有对导尿检查表的可靠性进行过测试。目的:本研究旨在评估Gadjah Mada大学医学院护理科学专业导尿检查表工具的互信度。方法:本研究为心理测试研究。两名评分员由一名四年级学生和一名讲师组成,他们对参加欧安组织考试的93名二年级学生进行了测量。采用卡帕检验和一致性百分比(PA)对测量结果进行分析。而项目的信度分析则采用加权kappa法,而一些悖论项目可以用患病率和偏倚调整kappa -序数量表(PABAK-OS)进行计数,以分离偏倚和流行效应。结果:信度的测量结果为0.57,表明该量表属于中等程度,PA为78.49%。根据Osborne(2008)和Stemler and Tsai(2008)的研究,这种核对表的信度被认为是可以接受的。同时,各项目的测量结果显示出不同的信度。该项目的信度值在0,24-0,96之间。同时,影响欧安组织评级的一些因素分为项目和评级。结论:导尿检查表具有中等信度值,可作为OSCE评估的工具。然而,有9项是不可靠的,必须改进。【摘要】目的探讨结构化临床检查(OSCE)对阴茎勃起功能障碍的影响。欧安组织主席萨拉赫说:“我是欧安组织主席。”欧洲安全与合作组织(欧安组织)的仪器检查表和部件检查表的可靠性。PSIK - FK - UGM的可靠性检查表。图胡安:Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui互译器可靠性检查表欧安组织kateterisasi urin di程序研究Ilmu keperwatan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada。方法:Penelitian ini merupakan Penelitian psikometri。2003年,欧安组织执行了一项新任务,即:在欧安组织执行一项新任务,即在欧安组织执行一项新任务。Hasil企鹅akan dihitung dan diuji menggunakan uji kappa dan百分比协议(PA)。Sedangkan的信度包括:kateterisasin akan dihitung dengan menggunakan加权kappa, dan beberapa项目yang mengalami paroks, akan dihitung menggunakan患病率和偏差调整kappa -序数量表(PABAK-OS)和menghilangkan efek偏差和患病率。Hasil dari penghitungan nilai kappa menunjukkan bahwa checklist kateterisasi urin memoriliki nilai kappa sebesar 0,57, dan PA sebesar 78,49%。世当坎企鹅项目menunjukkan hasil yang bervariasi。中国农业大学学报(自然科学版),24- 29,96。欧洲安全与合作组织(欧安组织)的调适因素是,该组织的调适因素是,调适因素是,该组织的调适因素是:kespulan: Checklist kateterisasi urin merupakan Checklist dengan kategori reliability is sedang dan merupakan ceklis yang reliability。Namun、terapapat 9项帕达核对表简洁,但杨氏记忆库的可靠性为terapapak帕达核对表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interrater Reliability Checklist Osce Kateterisasi Urin Di Program Studi Ilmu Keperawatan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada
Background: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is one of summative test method for performance-based assessment. One of component that make up an OSCE is assessment instrumen. Whereas checklist is one of OSCE’s component that affect OSCE’s reliability. As long as this checklist was implemented in Nursing Science Program, Faculty of Medicine, UGM, the reliability of urinary catheterization checklist hasn’t been testedObjective: This study aims to assess interrater reliability of OSCE checklist instruments for urinary catheterization in Nursing Science Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada.Methods: This study is a psychometric testing study. Two rater consisted of a fourth-year student and a lecturer who performed measurement on 93 second-year students who was taking the OSCE examination. The measurement result were analyzed using kappa test and percent agreement (PA). Whereas the item’s reliability were analyzed using weighted kappa dan some items which is paradox can be count with Prevalence and Bias Adjusted Kappa-Ordinal Scale (PABAK-OS) to separate the bias and prevalence effect.Results: The results of measurement of the reliability was 0,57, which indicated that the checklist was in the moderate category, and the PA was 78,49%. According to Osborne (2008) and Stemler and Tsai (2008), this checklist reliability considered as acceptable. Meanwhile, the result of measurement of each item indicated various reliabilities. Reliability value on this checklist’s item was around 0,24-0,96. Meanwhile, some factors that affect OSCE’s rating categorized as item and rater.Conclusion: The checklist of urinary catheterization has moderate reliability value and can be used as an instrument for the OSCE assessment. However, there were 9 items that weren’t reliable and must be improved. ABSTRAKLatar belakang: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) merupakan salah satu metode penilaian sumatif dalam penilaian berbasis performa. Salah satu komponen yang menyusun OSCE adalah instrumen penilaian. Instrumen checklist merupakan komponen OSCE yang mempengaruhi reliabilitas penilaian tersebut. Selama diterapkan di PSIK FK UGM, reliabilitas checklist kateterisasi urin belum pernah diuji.Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui interrater reliability checklist OSCE kateterisasi urin di Program Studi Ilmu Keperawatan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada.Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian psikometri. Dua rater yang terdiri dari mahasiswa tingkat  4 dan seorang dosen menilai performa 93 mahasiswa tahun kedua dalam stase kateterisasi urin saat OSCE. Hasil pengukuran akan dihitung dan diuji menggunakan uji kappa dan Percent Agreement (PA). Sedangkan reliabilitas tiap item kateterisasi urin akan dihitung dengan menggunakan weighted kappa, dan beberapa item yang mengalami paradoks akan dihitung menggunakan Prevalence And Bias Adjusted Kappa-Ordinal Scale (PABAK-OS) untuk menghilangkan efek bias dan prevalensi.Hasil: Hasil dari penghitungan nilai kappa menunjukkan bahwa checklist kateterisasi urin memiliki nilai kappa sebesar 0,57, dan PA sebesar 78,49%. Sedangkan pengukuran item menunjukkan hasil yang bervariasi. Nilai kappa item berada pada kisaran 0,24-0,96. Adapun faktor yang mempengaruhi penilaian OSCE dapat dilihat dari sudut pandang item maupun rater.Kesimpulan: Checklist kateterisasi urin merupakan checklist dengan kategori reliabilitas sedang dan merupakan ceklis yang reliabel. Namun, terdapat 9 item pada checklist tersebut yang memerlukan perbaikan karena reliabilitasnya tidak dapat diterima.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信