机会民主化:谁从Airbnb市场中受益?

Abdollah Farhoodi
{"title":"机会民主化:谁从Airbnb市场中受益?","authors":"Abdollah Farhoodi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3480518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peer-to-peer markets allow small suppliers to enter markets traditionally occupied by large firms and provide a potential decentralized distribution of opportunities. This paper investigates how these opportunities are distributed across agents and affected by government regulations. Using daily panel data of Airbnb rentals in Chicago, I develop an individual-level multinomial logit model to estimate consumer and producer surpluses across differentiated agents. The results find higher surpluses for low-income property owners but indicate a disproportionate concentration of welfare in high-income neighborhoods. The counterfactual analysis shows that restricting institutional hosts reinforces this concentration. However, increasing tax rates potentially helps redistribute welfare.","PeriodicalId":107258,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Networks (Topic)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Democratizing the Opportunities: Who Benefits from the Airbnb Market?\",\"authors\":\"Abdollah Farhoodi\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3480518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peer-to-peer markets allow small suppliers to enter markets traditionally occupied by large firms and provide a potential decentralized distribution of opportunities. This paper investigates how these opportunities are distributed across agents and affected by government regulations. Using daily panel data of Airbnb rentals in Chicago, I develop an individual-level multinomial logit model to estimate consumer and producer surpluses across differentiated agents. The results find higher surpluses for low-income property owners but indicate a disproportionate concentration of welfare in high-income neighborhoods. The counterfactual analysis shows that restricting institutional hosts reinforces this concentration. However, increasing tax rates potentially helps redistribute welfare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Networks (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Networks (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3480518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Networks (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3480518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

点对点市场允许小供应商进入传统上由大公司占据的市场,并提供潜在的分散分配机会。本文研究了这些机会如何在代理人之间分配以及如何受到政府法规的影响。利用芝加哥Airbnb租赁的每日面板数据,我开发了一个个人层面的多项逻辑模型,以估计不同代理人之间的消费者和生产者剩余。结果发现,低收入业主的盈余较高,但福利不成比例地集中在高收入社区。反事实分析表明,限制机构东道主强化了这种集中。然而,提高税率可能有助于福利的再分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Democratizing the Opportunities: Who Benefits from the Airbnb Market?
Peer-to-peer markets allow small suppliers to enter markets traditionally occupied by large firms and provide a potential decentralized distribution of opportunities. This paper investigates how these opportunities are distributed across agents and affected by government regulations. Using daily panel data of Airbnb rentals in Chicago, I develop an individual-level multinomial logit model to estimate consumer and producer surpluses across differentiated agents. The results find higher surpluses for low-income property owners but indicate a disproportionate concentration of welfare in high-income neighborhoods. The counterfactual analysis shows that restricting institutional hosts reinforces this concentration. However, increasing tax rates potentially helps redistribute welfare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信