{"title":"美国证券交易委员会根据《就业法案》制定众筹规则——失去了机会?","authors":"Samuel Guzik","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2393897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On April 5, 2012, President Barack Obama signed into law the JOBS Act of 2012, intended to facilitate capital formation for small business, widely viewed as the principal engine of job creation in the United States. One of the JOBS Act’s more controversial provisions, Title III, created an exemption from registration of the offer and sale of \"crowdfunded\" securities under the Securities Act of 1933, allowing the sale of securities to an unlimited number of unaccredited investors without registration, on an Internet-based platform, through intermediaries which are either registered broker-dealers or SEC licensed \"funding portals.\" Title III provided for a number of built-in investor protections, including limitations on the amount invested, limitation on the amount an issuer may raise in a 12 month period ($1 million), detailed financial and non-financial disclosure in connection with the offering, and ongoing annual issuer disclosure. Congress left much of the details of Title III in the hands of the SEC, to be fleshed out in the rulemaking process.More than 18 months later, on October 23, 2013, in a 585 page release, the Commission approved the issuance of proposed Title III rules for public comment, with the comment period expiring in February 2014.The following commentary addresses certain choices and challenges of the SEC in the ongoing Title III rulemaking process, evaluating a number of key areas where proposed rulemaking has in many instances exacerbated the inherent cost and complexity inherent in the Title III structure created by Congress, and suggesting alternative approaches in the rulemaking process as the SEC undertakes to finalize Title III rules.","PeriodicalId":105752,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Regulatory Law & Policy (Topic)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SEC Crowdfunding Rulemaking Under the Jobs Act -- An Opportunity Lost?\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Guzik\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2393897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On April 5, 2012, President Barack Obama signed into law the JOBS Act of 2012, intended to facilitate capital formation for small business, widely viewed as the principal engine of job creation in the United States. One of the JOBS Act’s more controversial provisions, Title III, created an exemption from registration of the offer and sale of \\\"crowdfunded\\\" securities under the Securities Act of 1933, allowing the sale of securities to an unlimited number of unaccredited investors without registration, on an Internet-based platform, through intermediaries which are either registered broker-dealers or SEC licensed \\\"funding portals.\\\" Title III provided for a number of built-in investor protections, including limitations on the amount invested, limitation on the amount an issuer may raise in a 12 month period ($1 million), detailed financial and non-financial disclosure in connection with the offering, and ongoing annual issuer disclosure. Congress left much of the details of Title III in the hands of the SEC, to be fleshed out in the rulemaking process.More than 18 months later, on October 23, 2013, in a 585 page release, the Commission approved the issuance of proposed Title III rules for public comment, with the comment period expiring in February 2014.The following commentary addresses certain choices and challenges of the SEC in the ongoing Title III rulemaking process, evaluating a number of key areas where proposed rulemaking has in many instances exacerbated the inherent cost and complexity inherent in the Title III structure created by Congress, and suggesting alternative approaches in the rulemaking process as the SEC undertakes to finalize Title III rules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRPN: Innovation & Regulatory Law & Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRPN: Innovation & Regulatory Law & Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2393897\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation & Regulatory Law & Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2393897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
2012年4月5日,美国总统巴拉克•奥巴马(Barack Obama)签署了《2012年就业法案》(JOBS Act of 2012),旨在促进小企业的资本形成。小企业被广泛视为美国创造就业机会的主要引擎。《就业法案》中最有争议的条款之一是第三章,根据1933年的《证券法》,“众筹”证券的发行和销售豁免注册,允许在基于互联网的平台上,通过注册经纪交易商或SEC许可的“融资门户”中介机构,向无限数量的未经注册的投资者出售证券。第三章规定了一些内置的投资者保护措施,包括对投资金额的限制,对发行人在12个月内可能筹集的金额(100万美元)的限制,与发行有关的详细财务和非财务披露,以及正在进行的年度发行人披露。国会将第三章的许多细节交给了SEC,让其在制定规则的过程中加以充实。18个多月后,2013年10月23日,在一份585页的新闻稿中,委员会批准发布拟议的标题III规则以征求公众意见,评论期将于2014年2月到期。以下评论论述了美国证券交易委员会在正在进行的第三章规则制定过程中的某些选择和挑战,评估了一些关键领域,在这些领域,拟议的规则制定在许多情况下加剧了国会制定的第三章结构固有的成本和复杂性,并在美国证券交易委员会承诺最终确定第三章规则时,提出了规则制定过程中的替代方法。
SEC Crowdfunding Rulemaking Under the Jobs Act -- An Opportunity Lost?
On April 5, 2012, President Barack Obama signed into law the JOBS Act of 2012, intended to facilitate capital formation for small business, widely viewed as the principal engine of job creation in the United States. One of the JOBS Act’s more controversial provisions, Title III, created an exemption from registration of the offer and sale of "crowdfunded" securities under the Securities Act of 1933, allowing the sale of securities to an unlimited number of unaccredited investors without registration, on an Internet-based platform, through intermediaries which are either registered broker-dealers or SEC licensed "funding portals." Title III provided for a number of built-in investor protections, including limitations on the amount invested, limitation on the amount an issuer may raise in a 12 month period ($1 million), detailed financial and non-financial disclosure in connection with the offering, and ongoing annual issuer disclosure. Congress left much of the details of Title III in the hands of the SEC, to be fleshed out in the rulemaking process.More than 18 months later, on October 23, 2013, in a 585 page release, the Commission approved the issuance of proposed Title III rules for public comment, with the comment period expiring in February 2014.The following commentary addresses certain choices and challenges of the SEC in the ongoing Title III rulemaking process, evaluating a number of key areas where proposed rulemaking has in many instances exacerbated the inherent cost and complexity inherent in the Title III structure created by Congress, and suggesting alternative approaches in the rulemaking process as the SEC undertakes to finalize Title III rules.