{"title":"海军空射导弹维修过程行动小组——技术与全面质量管理之间的桥梁","authors":"C.D. Paladino","doi":"10.1109/AUTEST.1994.381520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current Navy air launched missile (ALM) maintenance includes automatic test equipment (ATE) with varying levels of technology, training, software, and test requirements. These factors, along with excessive and redundant testing have greatly increased maintenance costs. Subsequent ATE inefficiencies and obsolescence influenced the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) to form a Quality Management Board (QMB) to address these problems. The QMB established thirteen Process Action Teams (PAT's) to evaluate the Navy's ALM testing philosophies. This paper outlines the current PAT efforts and accomplishments with emphasis on Army and Air Force practices such as mobile and proximity testing.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":308840,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of AUTOTESTCON '94","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navy air-launched missile maintenance process action teams-a bridge between technology and total quality management\",\"authors\":\"C.D. Paladino\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AUTEST.1994.381520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current Navy air launched missile (ALM) maintenance includes automatic test equipment (ATE) with varying levels of technology, training, software, and test requirements. These factors, along with excessive and redundant testing have greatly increased maintenance costs. Subsequent ATE inefficiencies and obsolescence influenced the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) to form a Quality Management Board (QMB) to address these problems. The QMB established thirteen Process Action Teams (PAT's) to evaluate the Navy's ALM testing philosophies. This paper outlines the current PAT efforts and accomplishments with emphasis on Army and Air Force practices such as mobile and proximity testing.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":308840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of AUTOTESTCON '94\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of AUTOTESTCON '94\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.1994.381520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of AUTOTESTCON '94","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.1994.381520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Navy air-launched missile maintenance process action teams-a bridge between technology and total quality management
Current Navy air launched missile (ALM) maintenance includes automatic test equipment (ATE) with varying levels of technology, training, software, and test requirements. These factors, along with excessive and redundant testing have greatly increased maintenance costs. Subsequent ATE inefficiencies and obsolescence influenced the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) to form a Quality Management Board (QMB) to address these problems. The QMB established thirteen Process Action Teams (PAT's) to evaluate the Navy's ALM testing philosophies. This paper outlines the current PAT efforts and accomplishments with emphasis on Army and Air Force practices such as mobile and proximity testing.<>