同样的拉动方式?政府危机合作的多视角研究

Ann Ödlund
{"title":"同样的拉动方式?政府危机合作的多视角研究","authors":"Ann Ödlund","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00605.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After crises have occurred, limitations in crisis management capacity often cause surprise and frustration. An explanation that frequently recurs in evaluations is a lack of efficient cooperation between organizations. Even though crisis cooperation is anticipated and planned for, it seems to create several problems. How is cooperation possible between organizations with different mandates, cultures and professions? This paper aims to identify factors that strengthen or hamper cooperation in crisis management between Swedish government agencies. A rationalist organizational and a social psychological perspective are applied, respectively, to demonstrate the interdependence of organizational context and human behaviour. One conclusion is that long-term organizing and exercises could help authorities to identify strengths and weaknesses such as differences in regulations and culture. If carefully addressed and considered, such insights could improve the effectiveness of cooperation during crises.","PeriodicalId":447069,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Structure","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulling the Same Way? A Multi-Perspectivist Study of Crisis Cooperation in Government\",\"authors\":\"Ann Ödlund\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00605.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After crises have occurred, limitations in crisis management capacity often cause surprise and frustration. An explanation that frequently recurs in evaluations is a lack of efficient cooperation between organizations. Even though crisis cooperation is anticipated and planned for, it seems to create several problems. How is cooperation possible between organizations with different mandates, cultures and professions? This paper aims to identify factors that strengthen or hamper cooperation in crisis management between Swedish government agencies. A rationalist organizational and a social psychological perspective are applied, respectively, to demonstrate the interdependence of organizational context and human behaviour. One conclusion is that long-term organizing and exercises could help authorities to identify strengths and weaknesses such as differences in regulations and culture. If carefully addressed and considered, such insights could improve the effectiveness of cooperation during crises.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Structure\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"58\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Structure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00605.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Structure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00605.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

摘要

危机发生后,危机管理能力的限制往往会引起意外和挫折。在评价中经常出现的一个解释是组织之间缺乏有效的合作。尽管危机合作是预期和计划的,但它似乎产生了一些问题。具有不同任务、文化和专业的组织之间如何进行合作?本文旨在确定加强或阻碍瑞典政府机构之间危机管理合作的因素。理性主义的组织和社会心理学的观点分别应用,以证明组织环境和人类行为的相互依存关系。一个结论是,长期的组织和练习可以帮助当局确定优势和劣势,例如法规和文化的差异。如果仔细处理和考虑,这些见解可以提高危机期间合作的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulling the Same Way? A Multi-Perspectivist Study of Crisis Cooperation in Government
After crises have occurred, limitations in crisis management capacity often cause surprise and frustration. An explanation that frequently recurs in evaluations is a lack of efficient cooperation between organizations. Even though crisis cooperation is anticipated and planned for, it seems to create several problems. How is cooperation possible between organizations with different mandates, cultures and professions? This paper aims to identify factors that strengthen or hamper cooperation in crisis management between Swedish government agencies. A rationalist organizational and a social psychological perspective are applied, respectively, to demonstrate the interdependence of organizational context and human behaviour. One conclusion is that long-term organizing and exercises could help authorities to identify strengths and weaknesses such as differences in regulations and culture. If carefully addressed and considered, such insights could improve the effectiveness of cooperation during crises.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信