连续观察工作抽样及其验证

Cheng-Pin Ho, E. S. Pape
{"title":"连续观察工作抽样及其验证","authors":"Cheng-Pin Ho, E. S. Pape","doi":"10.1108/00438020110363757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Work sampling focuses mainly on determining the proportion of times for a specified category within a predetermined tolerance at a specified statistical risk. Conventional practices are based on numerous snap (instantaneous) observations taken randomly. This study employs the extensively used method of “production study” or so‐called continuous observation work sampling (COWS). Data from continuous observation of activity are used to make point estimates of the average time spent in each category and also the proportion of time occupied by a specified category. This study concentrates mainly on determining and verifying the interval estimates that derived from two different process assumptions, alternating Poisson process (APP) and alternating unspecified process (AUP), for a proportion when using COWS. Simulation results indicate that the confidence interval formulae derived for AUP assumptions are robust if the sample sizes for both modes exceed 100. Although the exact formulae are derived from APP, poor results yield if the true process deviated from APP.","PeriodicalId":340241,"journal":{"name":"Work Study","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous observation work sampling and its verification\",\"authors\":\"Cheng-Pin Ho, E. S. Pape\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/00438020110363757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Work sampling focuses mainly on determining the proportion of times for a specified category within a predetermined tolerance at a specified statistical risk. Conventional practices are based on numerous snap (instantaneous) observations taken randomly. This study employs the extensively used method of “production study” or so‐called continuous observation work sampling (COWS). Data from continuous observation of activity are used to make point estimates of the average time spent in each category and also the proportion of time occupied by a specified category. This study concentrates mainly on determining and verifying the interval estimates that derived from two different process assumptions, alternating Poisson process (APP) and alternating unspecified process (AUP), for a proportion when using COWS. Simulation results indicate that the confidence interval formulae derived for AUP assumptions are robust if the sample sizes for both modes exceed 100. Although the exact formulae are derived from APP, poor results yield if the true process deviated from APP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Work Study\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Work Study\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/00438020110363757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work Study","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/00438020110363757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

工作抽样主要侧重于确定在规定的统计风险下,在预定公差范围内的特定类别的时间比例。传统的做法是基于大量随机的瞬间观察。本研究采用了广泛使用的“生产研究”或所谓的连续观察工作抽样(COWS)方法。活动的连续观测数据用于对每个类别的平均花费时间以及特定类别所占用的时间比例进行点估计。本研究主要集中在确定和验证两个不同的过程假设,交替泊松过程(APP)和交替未指定过程(AUP),在使用奶牛时的比例区间估计。仿真结果表明,当两种模式的样本量均大于100时,基于AUP假设的置信区间公式具有较好的鲁棒性。虽然精确的公式是从APP推导出来的,但如果真实过程偏离APP,结果就会很差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuous observation work sampling and its verification
Work sampling focuses mainly on determining the proportion of times for a specified category within a predetermined tolerance at a specified statistical risk. Conventional practices are based on numerous snap (instantaneous) observations taken randomly. This study employs the extensively used method of “production study” or so‐called continuous observation work sampling (COWS). Data from continuous observation of activity are used to make point estimates of the average time spent in each category and also the proportion of time occupied by a specified category. This study concentrates mainly on determining and verifying the interval estimates that derived from two different process assumptions, alternating Poisson process (APP) and alternating unspecified process (AUP), for a proportion when using COWS. Simulation results indicate that the confidence interval formulae derived for AUP assumptions are robust if the sample sizes for both modes exceed 100. Although the exact formulae are derived from APP, poor results yield if the true process deviated from APP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信