爱好及其他亏损活动在新西兰的税收状况

Andrew M. C. Smith
{"title":"爱好及其他亏损活动在新西兰的税收状况","authors":"Andrew M. C. Smith","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2319199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A feature of New Zealand’s income tax regime is that it imposes tax on a “gross-global” basis which was clarified with the enactment of revised core provisions in 1994. A consequence imposing income tax on a “gross” basis is that whether a receipt is liable to income tax is done so in isolation without any consideration as to whether there is a resultant net income or loss produced. The “global” basis of imposing income tax means that any such losses can be offset against any other income the taxpayer has from other sources. For several decades the Commissioner of Inland Revenue regularly reviewed tax losses reported by taxpayers with the aim of denying offset of those losses against other income where there was little prospect of the taxpayer’s activity becoming profitable. However, after the decision of the 1985 Court of Appeal in Grieve v. CIR 6 NZTC 61,682 and the enactment of revised core provisions in 1994, his scope for doing so is not as broad as was prior to these events.This paper examines the issue of whether an offset should be allowed for losses arising from activities which have poor prospects of future profitability. In particular arguments can be made for clarifying the tax status of hobby or recreational activities which are not primarily carried on with the objective of earning income but may produce gross income from time to time. A further advantage of having a specific provision to deal with these activities is that is a prescribed treatment could be offered for any past losses should that hobby metamorphose into a profitable business. Another area would be where such a rule could be applied is in the area of rental property where excessive outgoings may be incurred by a taxpayer relative to its rental generation capacity, which will ultimately be recovered by the property’s disposal at a capital gain. Consideration of the recent reforms to “mixed-use” assets will also be made as well as the non-commercial loss rules in the Australian tax regime.","PeriodicalId":262460,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Public Tax Law - Non-U.S. (Topic)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Tax Status of Hobbies and Other Loss-Making Activities in New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"Andrew M. C. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2319199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A feature of New Zealand’s income tax regime is that it imposes tax on a “gross-global” basis which was clarified with the enactment of revised core provisions in 1994. A consequence imposing income tax on a “gross” basis is that whether a receipt is liable to income tax is done so in isolation without any consideration as to whether there is a resultant net income or loss produced. The “global” basis of imposing income tax means that any such losses can be offset against any other income the taxpayer has from other sources. For several decades the Commissioner of Inland Revenue regularly reviewed tax losses reported by taxpayers with the aim of denying offset of those losses against other income where there was little prospect of the taxpayer’s activity becoming profitable. However, after the decision of the 1985 Court of Appeal in Grieve v. CIR 6 NZTC 61,682 and the enactment of revised core provisions in 1994, his scope for doing so is not as broad as was prior to these events.This paper examines the issue of whether an offset should be allowed for losses arising from activities which have poor prospects of future profitability. In particular arguments can be made for clarifying the tax status of hobby or recreational activities which are not primarily carried on with the objective of earning income but may produce gross income from time to time. A further advantage of having a specific provision to deal with these activities is that is a prescribed treatment could be offered for any past losses should that hobby metamorphose into a profitable business. Another area would be where such a rule could be applied is in the area of rental property where excessive outgoings may be incurred by a taxpayer relative to its rental generation capacity, which will ultimately be recovered by the property’s disposal at a capital gain. Consideration of the recent reforms to “mixed-use” assets will also be made as well as the non-commercial loss rules in the Australian tax regime.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Public Tax Law - Non-U.S. (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Public Tax Law - Non-U.S. (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2319199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Public Tax Law - Non-U.S. (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2319199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新西兰所得税制度的一个特点是,它在“全球总额”的基础上征税,1994年修订的核心条款的颁布澄清了这一点。以"毛额"为基础征收所得税的一个后果是,收据是否应缴纳所得税是孤立地进行的,而不考虑由此产生的净收入或损失。征收所得税的“全球”基础意味着,任何此类损失都可以用纳税人从其他来源获得的任何其他收入来抵消。几十年来,税务局局长定期审查纳税人报告的税收损失,目的是拒绝将这些损失从纳税人的活动几乎没有盈利前景的其他收入中抵消。然而,在1985年上诉法院在Grieve诉CIR 6 NZTC 61,682案中作出裁决和1994年颁布修订的核心条款之后,他这样做的范围不像这些事件之前那么广泛了。本文探讨了是否应允许对未来盈利前景不佳的活动所产生的损失进行抵销的问题。特别值得一提的是,可以就澄清爱好或娱乐活动的税收地位提出论点,这些活动的主要目的不是赚取收入,而是可能不时产生总收入。有一个专门的条款来处理这些活动的另一个好处是,如果这种爱好转变为有利可图的业务,可以为过去的任何损失提供规定的处理方法。另一个适用此类规则的领域是租赁物业,在这些领域,纳税人可能会产生相对于其租赁发电能力的过度支出,而这些支出最终将通过处置该物业获得资本利得来收回。还将考虑最近对“混合用途”资产的改革,以及澳大利亚税收制度中的非商业损失规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Tax Status of Hobbies and Other Loss-Making Activities in New Zealand
A feature of New Zealand’s income tax regime is that it imposes tax on a “gross-global” basis which was clarified with the enactment of revised core provisions in 1994. A consequence imposing income tax on a “gross” basis is that whether a receipt is liable to income tax is done so in isolation without any consideration as to whether there is a resultant net income or loss produced. The “global” basis of imposing income tax means that any such losses can be offset against any other income the taxpayer has from other sources. For several decades the Commissioner of Inland Revenue regularly reviewed tax losses reported by taxpayers with the aim of denying offset of those losses against other income where there was little prospect of the taxpayer’s activity becoming profitable. However, after the decision of the 1985 Court of Appeal in Grieve v. CIR 6 NZTC 61,682 and the enactment of revised core provisions in 1994, his scope for doing so is not as broad as was prior to these events.This paper examines the issue of whether an offset should be allowed for losses arising from activities which have poor prospects of future profitability. In particular arguments can be made for clarifying the tax status of hobby or recreational activities which are not primarily carried on with the objective of earning income but may produce gross income from time to time. A further advantage of having a specific provision to deal with these activities is that is a prescribed treatment could be offered for any past losses should that hobby metamorphose into a profitable business. Another area would be where such a rule could be applied is in the area of rental property where excessive outgoings may be incurred by a taxpayer relative to its rental generation capacity, which will ultimately be recovered by the property’s disposal at a capital gain. Consideration of the recent reforms to “mixed-use” assets will also be made as well as the non-commercial loss rules in the Australian tax regime.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信