mea模型和学习动机对学生学习成果的影响

Eka Resti Barus, Deny Setiawan, D. Saragi
{"title":"mea模型和学习动机对学生学习成果的影响","authors":"Eka Resti Barus, Deny Setiawan, D. Saragi","doi":"10.53768/sijel.v1i2.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine: 1) The effect of the AEC learning model and the expository learning model on student learning outcomes, 2) The effect of learning motivation skills on student learning outcomes. 3) The interaction between learning models and learning motivation on student learning outcomes. This study used a quasi-experimental research method. The research was conducted from April to May 2021. The population of this study was 40-grade students of SDN 034799 DOLOKTOLONG and 40 students of LANCANG SDN who were randomly assigned by random sampling technique. The sample is class IVA as many as 20 students as the experimental class and class IVB as many as 20 students as the control class. The data collection technique used a learning motivation questionnaire and a learning outcome test. The data analysis technique used two-way analysis of variance. The results of the study are as follows: (1) There are differences in learning outcomes students who were taught with the MEA learning model with an average value of 88.00 higher than the learning outcomes of students taught by the expository learning model with an average of 76,841, the analysis of variance results show Fcount value of 21.192> Ftable value of 3.24 and a probability or significance value of 0.00 <0.05 so that H0 is rejected; (2) There is a significant difference between student learning outcomes with high learning motivation and the average 88,113 and students who have low learning motivation on average 71,071. Result of analysis of variance obtained Fcount value of 7.211> Ftable value of 3.24 and a significant value of 0.00 <0.05 so that H0 is rejected; (3) There is an interaction between the AEC learning model and student motivation in improving student PPKn learning outcomes, the results of the analysis of variance Fcount value of 4.446> Ftable value of 3.24 and a significance of 0.008 <0.05 so that H0 is rejected.","PeriodicalId":430876,"journal":{"name":"Sensei International Journal of Education and Linguistic","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECT OF THE MEA MODEL AND LEARNING MOTIVATION ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES PPKN SUBJECTS AT SD\",\"authors\":\"Eka Resti Barus, Deny Setiawan, D. Saragi\",\"doi\":\"10.53768/sijel.v1i2.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine: 1) The effect of the AEC learning model and the expository learning model on student learning outcomes, 2) The effect of learning motivation skills on student learning outcomes. 3) The interaction between learning models and learning motivation on student learning outcomes. This study used a quasi-experimental research method. The research was conducted from April to May 2021. The population of this study was 40-grade students of SDN 034799 DOLOKTOLONG and 40 students of LANCANG SDN who were randomly assigned by random sampling technique. The sample is class IVA as many as 20 students as the experimental class and class IVB as many as 20 students as the control class. The data collection technique used a learning motivation questionnaire and a learning outcome test. The data analysis technique used two-way analysis of variance. The results of the study are as follows: (1) There are differences in learning outcomes students who were taught with the MEA learning model with an average value of 88.00 higher than the learning outcomes of students taught by the expository learning model with an average of 76,841, the analysis of variance results show Fcount value of 21.192> Ftable value of 3.24 and a probability or significance value of 0.00 <0.05 so that H0 is rejected; (2) There is a significant difference between student learning outcomes with high learning motivation and the average 88,113 and students who have low learning motivation on average 71,071. Result of analysis of variance obtained Fcount value of 7.211> Ftable value of 3.24 and a significant value of 0.00 <0.05 so that H0 is rejected; (3) There is an interaction between the AEC learning model and student motivation in improving student PPKn learning outcomes, the results of the analysis of variance Fcount value of 4.446> Ftable value of 3.24 and a significance of 0.008 <0.05 so that H0 is rejected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sensei International Journal of Education and Linguistic\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sensei International Journal of Education and Linguistic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53768/sijel.v1i2.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensei International Journal of Education and Linguistic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53768/sijel.v1i2.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定:1)AEC学习模式和说明文学习模式对学生学习成果的影响;2)学习动机技能对学生学习成果的影响。3)学习模式与学习动机对学生学习成果的交互作用。本研究采用准实验研究方法。该研究于2021年4月至5月进行。本研究采用随机抽样方法随机抽取的40名多洛托隆SDN 034799年级学生和40名澜沧江SDN学生作为研究对象。样本为IVA班20人作为实验班,IVB班20人作为对照班。数据收集技术采用学习动机问卷和学习结果测试。数据分析技术采用双向方差分析。研究结果如下:(1)采用MEA学习模式的学生在学习成果方面存在差异,其平均值为88.00,高于采用expository learning模式的学生的平均值为76,841;方差分析结果显示,Fcount值21.192> Ftable值3.24,概率或显著性值0.00,Ftable值3.24,显著性值0.00,Ftable值3.24,显著性值0.008 <0.05,拒绝H0。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE EFFECT OF THE MEA MODEL AND LEARNING MOTIVATION ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES PPKN SUBJECTS AT SD
This study aims to determine: 1) The effect of the AEC learning model and the expository learning model on student learning outcomes, 2) The effect of learning motivation skills on student learning outcomes. 3) The interaction between learning models and learning motivation on student learning outcomes. This study used a quasi-experimental research method. The research was conducted from April to May 2021. The population of this study was 40-grade students of SDN 034799 DOLOKTOLONG and 40 students of LANCANG SDN who were randomly assigned by random sampling technique. The sample is class IVA as many as 20 students as the experimental class and class IVB as many as 20 students as the control class. The data collection technique used a learning motivation questionnaire and a learning outcome test. The data analysis technique used two-way analysis of variance. The results of the study are as follows: (1) There are differences in learning outcomes students who were taught with the MEA learning model with an average value of 88.00 higher than the learning outcomes of students taught by the expository learning model with an average of 76,841, the analysis of variance results show Fcount value of 21.192> Ftable value of 3.24 and a probability or significance value of 0.00 <0.05 so that H0 is rejected; (2) There is a significant difference between student learning outcomes with high learning motivation and the average 88,113 and students who have low learning motivation on average 71,071. Result of analysis of variance obtained Fcount value of 7.211> Ftable value of 3.24 and a significant value of 0.00 <0.05 so that H0 is rejected; (3) There is an interaction between the AEC learning model and student motivation in improving student PPKn learning outcomes, the results of the analysis of variance Fcount value of 4.446> Ftable value of 3.24 and a significance of 0.008 <0.05 so that H0 is rejected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信