关键的照护

T. Nafees
{"title":"关键的照护","authors":"T. Nafees","doi":"10.1097/00000446-198708000-00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Previous trials involving patients with the ARDS have failed to show a beneficial effect of prone positioning during mechanical ventilatory support on outcomes. We evaluated the effect of early application of prone positioning on outcomes in patients with severe ARDS. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, we randomly assigned 466 patients with severe ARDS to undergo prone-positioning sessions of at least 16 hours or to be left in the supine position. Severe ARDS was defined as a ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the FiO2 of less than 150 mmHg, with a FiO2 of at least 0.6, a positive end-expiratory pressure of at least 5 cmH2O, and a tidal volume close to 6 mL per kilogram of predicted body weight. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who died from any cause within 28 days after inclusion. Results: A total of 237 patients were assigned to the prone group, and 229 patients were assigned to the supine group. The 28-day mortality was 16.0% in the prone group and 32.8% in the supine group (P<0.001). The hazard ratio for death with prone positioning was 0.39 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.63). Unadjusted 90-day mortality was 23.6% in the prone group versus 41.0% in the supine group (P<0.001), with a hazard ratio of 0.44 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.67). The incidence of complications did not differ significantly between the groups, except for the incidence of cardiac arrests, which was higher in the supine group. Conclusion: In patients with severe ARDS, early application of prolonged prone-positioning sessions significantly decreased 28-day and 90-day mortality.","PeriodicalId":380087,"journal":{"name":"Research and reviews: journal of nursing and health sciences","volume":"88 25 Pt 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Care-Nursing\",\"authors\":\"T. Nafees\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/00000446-198708000-00003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Previous trials involving patients with the ARDS have failed to show a beneficial effect of prone positioning during mechanical ventilatory support on outcomes. We evaluated the effect of early application of prone positioning on outcomes in patients with severe ARDS. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, we randomly assigned 466 patients with severe ARDS to undergo prone-positioning sessions of at least 16 hours or to be left in the supine position. Severe ARDS was defined as a ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the FiO2 of less than 150 mmHg, with a FiO2 of at least 0.6, a positive end-expiratory pressure of at least 5 cmH2O, and a tidal volume close to 6 mL per kilogram of predicted body weight. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who died from any cause within 28 days after inclusion. Results: A total of 237 patients were assigned to the prone group, and 229 patients were assigned to the supine group. The 28-day mortality was 16.0% in the prone group and 32.8% in the supine group (P<0.001). The hazard ratio for death with prone positioning was 0.39 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.63). Unadjusted 90-day mortality was 23.6% in the prone group versus 41.0% in the supine group (P<0.001), with a hazard ratio of 0.44 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.67). The incidence of complications did not differ significantly between the groups, except for the incidence of cardiac arrests, which was higher in the supine group. Conclusion: In patients with severe ARDS, early application of prolonged prone-positioning sessions significantly decreased 28-day and 90-day mortality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":380087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and reviews: journal of nursing and health sciences\",\"volume\":\"88 25 Pt 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and reviews: journal of nursing and health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/00000446-198708000-00003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and reviews: journal of nursing and health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00000446-198708000-00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先前涉及ARDS患者的试验未能显示机械通气支持时俯卧位对结果的有益影响。我们评估了早期应用俯卧位对严重ARDS患者预后的影响。方法:在这项多中心、前瞻性、随机、对照试验中,我们随机分配466例严重ARDS患者进行至少16小时的俯卧位治疗或保持仰卧位。重度ARDS定义为动脉氧分压与FiO2之比小于150 mmHg, FiO2至少为0.6,呼气末正压至少为5 cmH2O,潮气量接近每千克预测体重6 mL。主要结局是纳入后28天内死于任何原因的患者比例。结果:237例患者被分配到俯卧组,229例患者被分配到仰卧组。俯卧位组28天死亡率为16.0%,仰卧位组为32.8% (P<0.001)。俯卧位的死亡风险比为0.39(95%可信区间[CI], 0.25 ~ 0.63)。俯卧组未经调整的90天死亡率为23.6%,而仰卧组为41.0% (P<0.001),风险比为0.44 (95% CI, 0.29 ~ 0.67)。两组之间的并发症发生率无显著差异,除了心脏骤停的发生率,仰卧位组更高。结论:早期延长俯卧位可显著降低严重ARDS患者28天和90天死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical Care-Nursing
Background: Previous trials involving patients with the ARDS have failed to show a beneficial effect of prone positioning during mechanical ventilatory support on outcomes. We evaluated the effect of early application of prone positioning on outcomes in patients with severe ARDS. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, we randomly assigned 466 patients with severe ARDS to undergo prone-positioning sessions of at least 16 hours or to be left in the supine position. Severe ARDS was defined as a ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the FiO2 of less than 150 mmHg, with a FiO2 of at least 0.6, a positive end-expiratory pressure of at least 5 cmH2O, and a tidal volume close to 6 mL per kilogram of predicted body weight. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who died from any cause within 28 days after inclusion. Results: A total of 237 patients were assigned to the prone group, and 229 patients were assigned to the supine group. The 28-day mortality was 16.0% in the prone group and 32.8% in the supine group (P<0.001). The hazard ratio for death with prone positioning was 0.39 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.63). Unadjusted 90-day mortality was 23.6% in the prone group versus 41.0% in the supine group (P<0.001), with a hazard ratio of 0.44 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.67). The incidence of complications did not differ significantly between the groups, except for the incidence of cardiac arrests, which was higher in the supine group. Conclusion: In patients with severe ARDS, early application of prolonged prone-positioning sessions significantly decreased 28-day and 90-day mortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信