改进标准制定过程的观点:文件工厂还是共识管理?

Luke Emmet, Robin Bloomfield Adelard
{"title":"改进标准制定过程的观点:文件工厂还是共识管理?","authors":"Luke Emmet, Robin Bloomfield Adelard","doi":"10.1109/SESS.1997.595972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emerging standards and guidelines need to be timely and reflect the requirements of the industrial sector they are designed to support. However, often, the delay between the identification of a need for a standard and its eventual release is too long. There is a need for increased understanding of the sources of delay and deadlock within the standards process. In this paper we describe an application of PERE (Process Evaluation in Requirements Engineering) to the standards process. PERE provides an integrated process analysis that identifies improvement opportunities by considering process weaknesses and protections from both mechanistic and human factors viewpoints. The resulting analysis identified both classical resource allocation problems and also specific problems concerning the construction and management of consensus within a typical standards making body. A number of process improvement opportunities are identified that could be implemented to improve the standards process. We conclude that consensus problems are the real barrier to timely standards production. Ironically the present trend for more distributed working and electronic support (via e-mail etc.) may make the document factory aspect of standards production more efficient at the expense of consensus building.","PeriodicalId":345428,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Software Engineering Standards","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viewpoints on improving the standards making process: document factory or consensus management?\",\"authors\":\"Luke Emmet, Robin Bloomfield Adelard\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SESS.1997.595972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Emerging standards and guidelines need to be timely and reflect the requirements of the industrial sector they are designed to support. However, often, the delay between the identification of a need for a standard and its eventual release is too long. There is a need for increased understanding of the sources of delay and deadlock within the standards process. In this paper we describe an application of PERE (Process Evaluation in Requirements Engineering) to the standards process. PERE provides an integrated process analysis that identifies improvement opportunities by considering process weaknesses and protections from both mechanistic and human factors viewpoints. The resulting analysis identified both classical resource allocation problems and also specific problems concerning the construction and management of consensus within a typical standards making body. A number of process improvement opportunities are identified that could be implemented to improve the standards process. We conclude that consensus problems are the real barrier to timely standards production. Ironically the present trend for more distributed working and electronic support (via e-mail etc.) may make the document factory aspect of standards production more efficient at the expense of consensus building.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Software Engineering Standards\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Software Engineering Standards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SESS.1997.595972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Software Engineering Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SESS.1997.595972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

新出现的标准和指导方针必须及时,并反映其旨在支持的工业部门的要求。然而,通常,在确定一个标准的需求和它的最终发布之间的延迟太长。有必要进一步了解标准过程中延迟和死锁的来源。本文描述了PERE(需求工程过程评价)在标准过程中的应用。PERE提供了一个集成的过程分析,通过从机械和人为因素的角度考虑过程弱点和保护来识别改进机会。结果的分析既确定了典型的资源分配问题,也确定了在一个典型的标准制定机构内建立和管理协商一致意见的具体问题。许多过程改进的机会被识别出来,可以被实施来改进标准过程。我们得出结论,共识问题是及时制定标准的真正障碍。具有讽刺意味的是,目前更加分布式的工作和电子支持(通过电子邮件等)的趋势可能会以牺牲共识构建为代价,使标准生产的文档工厂方面更加高效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Viewpoints on improving the standards making process: document factory or consensus management?
Emerging standards and guidelines need to be timely and reflect the requirements of the industrial sector they are designed to support. However, often, the delay between the identification of a need for a standard and its eventual release is too long. There is a need for increased understanding of the sources of delay and deadlock within the standards process. In this paper we describe an application of PERE (Process Evaluation in Requirements Engineering) to the standards process. PERE provides an integrated process analysis that identifies improvement opportunities by considering process weaknesses and protections from both mechanistic and human factors viewpoints. The resulting analysis identified both classical resource allocation problems and also specific problems concerning the construction and management of consensus within a typical standards making body. A number of process improvement opportunities are identified that could be implemented to improve the standards process. We conclude that consensus problems are the real barrier to timely standards production. Ironically the present trend for more distributed working and electronic support (via e-mail etc.) may make the document factory aspect of standards production more efficient at the expense of consensus building.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信