对安全性进行推理的逻辑

J. Glasgow, G. MacEwen, P. Panangaden
{"title":"对安全性进行推理的逻辑","authors":"J. Glasgow, G. MacEwen, P. Panangaden","doi":"10.1109/CSFW.1990.128180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A formal framework called security logic (SL) is developed for specifying and reasoning about security policies, and for verifying that system designs adhere to such policies. Included in this framework is a definition of knowledge based on modal logic so that properties can be time-related, a definition of permission, and a definition of obligation. Permission is used to specify secrecy policies, and obligation is used to specify integrity policies. A security policy is given as a set of policy constraints on the SL model. The combination of policies is addressed. Examples based on policies from the current literature are given.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":185508,"journal":{"name":"[1990] Proceedings. The Computer Security Foundations Workshop III","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"150","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A logic for reasoning about security\",\"authors\":\"J. Glasgow, G. MacEwen, P. Panangaden\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSFW.1990.128180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A formal framework called security logic (SL) is developed for specifying and reasoning about security policies, and for verifying that system designs adhere to such policies. Included in this framework is a definition of knowledge based on modal logic so that properties can be time-related, a definition of permission, and a definition of obligation. Permission is used to specify secrecy policies, and obligation is used to specify integrity policies. A security policy is given as a set of policy constraints on the SL model. The combination of policies is addressed. Examples based on policies from the current literature are given.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":185508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1990] Proceedings. The Computer Security Foundations Workshop III\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"150\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1990] Proceedings. The Computer Security Foundations Workshop III\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSFW.1990.128180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1990] Proceedings. The Computer Security Foundations Workshop III","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSFW.1990.128180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 150

摘要

开发了一个称为安全逻辑(SL)的正式框架,用于指定和推理安全策略,并用于验证系统设计是否遵循此类策略。该框架包括基于模态逻辑的知识定义(以便属性可以与时间相关)、许可定义和义务定义。权限用于指定保密策略,义务用于指定完整性策略。安全策略是作为SL模型上的一组策略约束给出的。解决了政策组合问题。给出了基于当前文献中政策的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A logic for reasoning about security
A formal framework called security logic (SL) is developed for specifying and reasoning about security policies, and for verifying that system designs adhere to such policies. Included in this framework is a definition of knowledge based on modal logic so that properties can be time-related, a definition of permission, and a definition of obligation. Permission is used to specify secrecy policies, and obligation is used to specify integrity policies. A security policy is given as a set of policy constraints on the SL model. The combination of policies is addressed. Examples based on policies from the current literature are given.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信