超越UPF和CPF:低功耗设计和验证

B. Pangrle, J. Biggs, Cristophe Clavel, O. Domerego, K. M. Just
{"title":"超越UPF和CPF:低功耗设计和验证","authors":"B. Pangrle, J. Biggs, Cristophe Clavel, O. Domerego, K. M. Just","doi":"10.1109/DATE.2011.5763051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two formats for specifying power intent are currently in wide use in the industry today and as designers continue to strive for more power efficient designs new issues arise that need new solutions to improve on today's standards. This panel will discuss areas for improving today's power formats and the direction that these formats need to move, in order to provide the most efficient flows for design and verification and especially with regards to low-power. The scope of the formats and their suitability from early ESL design exploration to back-end signoff checking will also be discussed.","PeriodicalId":205976,"journal":{"name":"Design, Automation and Test in Europe","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond UPF & CPF: Low-power design and verification\",\"authors\":\"B. Pangrle, J. Biggs, Cristophe Clavel, O. Domerego, K. M. Just\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DATE.2011.5763051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two formats for specifying power intent are currently in wide use in the industry today and as designers continue to strive for more power efficient designs new issues arise that need new solutions to improve on today's standards. This panel will discuss areas for improving today's power formats and the direction that these formats need to move, in order to provide the most efficient flows for design and verification and especially with regards to low-power. The scope of the formats and their suitability from early ESL design exploration to back-end signoff checking will also be discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design, Automation and Test in Europe\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design, Automation and Test in Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DATE.2011.5763051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design, Automation and Test in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DATE.2011.5763051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两种指定功率意图的格式目前在工业中广泛使用,随着设计人员继续努力实现更节能的设计,出现了新的问题,需要新的解决方案来改进当今的标准。该小组将讨论改进当今电源格式的领域以及这些格式需要发展的方向,以便为设计和验证提供最有效的流程,特别是在低功耗方面。还将讨论格式的范围及其从早期ESL设计探索到后端签名检查的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond UPF & CPF: Low-power design and verification
Two formats for specifying power intent are currently in wide use in the industry today and as designers continue to strive for more power efficient designs new issues arise that need new solutions to improve on today's standards. This panel will discuss areas for improving today's power formats and the direction that these formats need to move, in order to provide the most efficient flows for design and verification and especially with regards to low-power. The scope of the formats and their suitability from early ESL design exploration to back-end signoff checking will also be discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信