{"title":"舍甫琴科诗歌的接受方式","authors":"Taras Pastukh","doi":"10.33402/ukr.2020-33-465-479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author of the article makes an attempt to consider the hermeneutic principles according to which the reader should approach the reception of Taras Shevchenko’s poetic works. He makes an excursus into the early history of the perception of T. Shevchenko’s poems and considers the responses of such readers and critics as H. Kvitka-Osnovianenko, V. Belinskyi, M. Kostomarov, P. Kulish, M. Drahomanov. This allows him to trace how certain socio-cultural predispositions of critics determined the perception of T. Shevchenko’s poetry. He also notes that already in the early reception of T. Shevchenko’s poems, two leading tendencies are outlined. One draws attention to their «truthfulness» and the other to their poetics. «Truthfulness» should be understood as the fact that T. Shevchenko’s poetry creates a figurative world according to certain rules that nature gives it through the author. Figurative expressiveness, compositional accuracy, semantic depth are the signs of «truthfulness» of T. Shevchenko’s poetry. It is essential to emphasize the self-importance of T. Shevchenko’s poetry, which was not a reflection of the author’s reality, but in which the specific structures of existence «manifested» themselves in a specific figurative form. And already being «manifested» in the figurative text, these structures somehow appealed to the surrounding reality, expressing and clarifying its individual fragments or situations. There are two leading trends in the art of understanding. The first one is that the reader should reduce his subjective factor to the possible minimum and turn his attention to understanding the work in its cultural-historical and author-biographical contexts. Another one indicates the temporality of understanding the text; the reader cannot perceive the work from the standpoint of the author’s time or some «universal» time. His understanding is always determined by his own time, which presupposes his socio-cultural situation, the state of language, the reader’s life biography. The reader must balance these two tendencies in his own interpretation. There are two important tendencies in the variety of possible approaches to reading the «Kobzar»: to study the language of texts and the existential and ontological situations that arise in them.\n\nKeywords: poetry, reception, hermeneutics, poetics, aesthetics, existence.","PeriodicalId":194701,"journal":{"name":"Ukraine: Cultural Heritage, National Identity, Statehood","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE WAYS OF SHEVCHENKO’S POEMS RECEPTION\",\"authors\":\"Taras Pastukh\",\"doi\":\"10.33402/ukr.2020-33-465-479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author of the article makes an attempt to consider the hermeneutic principles according to which the reader should approach the reception of Taras Shevchenko’s poetic works. He makes an excursus into the early history of the perception of T. Shevchenko’s poems and considers the responses of such readers and critics as H. Kvitka-Osnovianenko, V. Belinskyi, M. Kostomarov, P. Kulish, M. Drahomanov. This allows him to trace how certain socio-cultural predispositions of critics determined the perception of T. Shevchenko’s poetry. He also notes that already in the early reception of T. Shevchenko’s poems, two leading tendencies are outlined. One draws attention to their «truthfulness» and the other to their poetics. «Truthfulness» should be understood as the fact that T. Shevchenko’s poetry creates a figurative world according to certain rules that nature gives it through the author. Figurative expressiveness, compositional accuracy, semantic depth are the signs of «truthfulness» of T. Shevchenko’s poetry. It is essential to emphasize the self-importance of T. Shevchenko’s poetry, which was not a reflection of the author’s reality, but in which the specific structures of existence «manifested» themselves in a specific figurative form. And already being «manifested» in the figurative text, these structures somehow appealed to the surrounding reality, expressing and clarifying its individual fragments or situations. There are two leading trends in the art of understanding. The first one is that the reader should reduce his subjective factor to the possible minimum and turn his attention to understanding the work in its cultural-historical and author-biographical contexts. Another one indicates the temporality of understanding the text; the reader cannot perceive the work from the standpoint of the author’s time or some «universal» time. His understanding is always determined by his own time, which presupposes his socio-cultural situation, the state of language, the reader’s life biography. The reader must balance these two tendencies in his own interpretation. There are two important tendencies in the variety of possible approaches to reading the «Kobzar»: to study the language of texts and the existential and ontological situations that arise in them.\\n\\nKeywords: poetry, reception, hermeneutics, poetics, aesthetics, existence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ukraine: Cultural Heritage, National Identity, Statehood\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ukraine: Cultural Heritage, National Identity, Statehood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33402/ukr.2020-33-465-479\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukraine: Cultural Heritage, National Identity, Statehood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33402/ukr.2020-33-465-479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文试图探讨读者在接受塔拉斯·舍甫琴科诗歌作品时应遵循的解释学原则。他对T.舍甫琴科诗歌的早期认知历史进行了考察,并考虑了H. Kvitka-Osnovianenko, V. Belinskyi, M. Kostomarov, P. Kulish, M. Drahomanov等读者和评论家的反应。这使他能够追踪评论家的某些社会文化倾向是如何决定对T.舍甫琴科诗歌的看法的。他还指出,在早期接受T.舍甫琴科的诗歌时,已经概述了两种主要倾向。一个吸引人们注意他们的“真实性”,另一个吸引人们注意他们的诗性。“真实”应该被理解为T.舍甫琴科的诗歌根据自然通过作者赋予它的某些规则创造了一个具象的世界。具象表现力、构图准确性、语义深度是舍甫琴科诗歌“真实”的标志。有必要强调舍甫琴科诗歌的自我重要性,这不是对作者现实的反映,而是存在的特定结构以特定的比喻形式“表现”自己。这些结构已经在具象文本中“表现”出来,以某种方式诉诸于周围的现实,表达和澄清其个别片段或情况。在理解的艺术中有两种主要趋势。首先,读者应该尽可能减少主观因素,将注意力转向在文化历史和作者传记背景下理解作品。另一个表明理解文本的时间性;读者不能从作者所处的时代或某个“普遍”的时代的角度来理解这部作品。他的理解总是由他所处的时代决定的,这预设了他的社会文化处境、语言状态、读者的人生传记。读者必须在自己的解读中平衡这两种倾向。在阅读《Kobzar》的各种可能方法中,有两个重要的趋势:研究文本的语言以及在文本中出现的存在和本体论情境。关键词:诗歌,接受,解释学,诗学,美学,存在。
The author of the article makes an attempt to consider the hermeneutic principles according to which the reader should approach the reception of Taras Shevchenko’s poetic works. He makes an excursus into the early history of the perception of T. Shevchenko’s poems and considers the responses of such readers and critics as H. Kvitka-Osnovianenko, V. Belinskyi, M. Kostomarov, P. Kulish, M. Drahomanov. This allows him to trace how certain socio-cultural predispositions of critics determined the perception of T. Shevchenko’s poetry. He also notes that already in the early reception of T. Shevchenko’s poems, two leading tendencies are outlined. One draws attention to their «truthfulness» and the other to their poetics. «Truthfulness» should be understood as the fact that T. Shevchenko’s poetry creates a figurative world according to certain rules that nature gives it through the author. Figurative expressiveness, compositional accuracy, semantic depth are the signs of «truthfulness» of T. Shevchenko’s poetry. It is essential to emphasize the self-importance of T. Shevchenko’s poetry, which was not a reflection of the author’s reality, but in which the specific structures of existence «manifested» themselves in a specific figurative form. And already being «manifested» in the figurative text, these structures somehow appealed to the surrounding reality, expressing and clarifying its individual fragments or situations. There are two leading trends in the art of understanding. The first one is that the reader should reduce his subjective factor to the possible minimum and turn his attention to understanding the work in its cultural-historical and author-biographical contexts. Another one indicates the temporality of understanding the text; the reader cannot perceive the work from the standpoint of the author’s time or some «universal» time. His understanding is always determined by his own time, which presupposes his socio-cultural situation, the state of language, the reader’s life biography. The reader must balance these two tendencies in his own interpretation. There are two important tendencies in the variety of possible approaches to reading the «Kobzar»: to study the language of texts and the existential and ontological situations that arise in them.
Keywords: poetry, reception, hermeneutics, poetics, aesthetics, existence.