{"title":"解密日志数据","authors":"Maria Klose, D. Steger, Julian Fick, C. Artelt","doi":"10.1027/2151-2604/a000484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Analyzing log data from digital learning environments provides information about online learning. However, it remains unclear how this information can be transferred to psychologically meaningful variables or how it is linked to learning outcomes. The present study summarizes findings on correlations between general online activity and learning outcomes in university settings. The course format, instructions to engage in online discussions, requirements, operationalization of general online activity, and publication year are considered moderators. A multi-source search provided 41 studies ( N = 28,986) reporting 69 independent samples and 104 effect sizes. The three-level random-effects meta-analysis identified a pooled effect of r = .25 p = .003, 95% CI [.09, .41], indicating that students who are more active online have better grades. Despite high heterogeneity, Q(103) = 3,960.04, p < .001, moderator analyses showed no statistically significant effect. We discuss further potential influencing factors in online courses and highlight the potential of learning analytics.","PeriodicalId":263823,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Psychologie","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decrypting Log Data\",\"authors\":\"Maria Klose, D. Steger, Julian Fick, C. Artelt\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/2151-2604/a000484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Analyzing log data from digital learning environments provides information about online learning. However, it remains unclear how this information can be transferred to psychologically meaningful variables or how it is linked to learning outcomes. The present study summarizes findings on correlations between general online activity and learning outcomes in university settings. The course format, instructions to engage in online discussions, requirements, operationalization of general online activity, and publication year are considered moderators. A multi-source search provided 41 studies ( N = 28,986) reporting 69 independent samples and 104 effect sizes. The three-level random-effects meta-analysis identified a pooled effect of r = .25 p = .003, 95% CI [.09, .41], indicating that students who are more active online have better grades. Despite high heterogeneity, Q(103) = 3,960.04, p < .001, moderator analyses showed no statistically significant effect. We discuss further potential influencing factors in online courses and highlight the potential of learning analytics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift für Psychologie\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift für Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要。分析来自数字学习环境的日志数据可以提供有关在线学习的信息。然而,目前还不清楚这些信息是如何转化为有心理意义的变量的,或者它是如何与学习结果联系在一起的。本研究总结了大学环境中一般在线活动与学习成果之间相关性的发现。课程格式、参与在线讨论的说明、要求、一般在线活动的操作化和出版年份被认为是版主。一项多源搜索提供了41项研究(N = 28,986),报告了69个独立样本和104个效应量。三水平随机效应荟萃分析确定了r = 0.25 p = 0.003, 95% CI[。][09.41],这表明在网上越活跃的学生成绩越好。尽管异质性很高,Q(103) = 3,960.04, p < .001,但调节因子分析显示无统计学意义。我们进一步讨论了在线课程的潜在影响因素,并强调了学习分析的潜力。
Abstract. Analyzing log data from digital learning environments provides information about online learning. However, it remains unclear how this information can be transferred to psychologically meaningful variables or how it is linked to learning outcomes. The present study summarizes findings on correlations between general online activity and learning outcomes in university settings. The course format, instructions to engage in online discussions, requirements, operationalization of general online activity, and publication year are considered moderators. A multi-source search provided 41 studies ( N = 28,986) reporting 69 independent samples and 104 effect sizes. The three-level random-effects meta-analysis identified a pooled effect of r = .25 p = .003, 95% CI [.09, .41], indicating that students who are more active online have better grades. Despite high heterogeneity, Q(103) = 3,960.04, p < .001, moderator analyses showed no statistically significant effect. We discuss further potential influencing factors in online courses and highlight the potential of learning analytics.