受害者身份和对待暴力历史遗留问题的态度:北爱尔兰个案研究

IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
John D. Brewer, Bernadette C. Hayes
{"title":"受害者身份和对待暴力历史遗留问题的态度:北爱尔兰个案研究","authors":"John D. Brewer,&nbsp;Bernadette C. Hayes","doi":"10.1111/1467-856X.12050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Using Northern Ireland as a case study, this article provides the first nationally representative and systematic study of victims' views on how to deal with the past;</li>\n \n <li>Focusing specifically on Northern Ireland, it both investigates and provides a comprehensive account of the marked divisions between the various religious groupings—Protestants, Catholics and the non-affiliated—in terms of a range of truth recovery mechanisms to deal with legacy of its violent past;</li>\n \n <li>It empirically investigates and validates two key predictors—perceptions of victimhood and general attitudes towards the past—in determining the source of these divisions</li>\n \n <li>It outlines the implications of our findings for other societies emerging from conflict.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>Truth recovery mechanisms have become a cornerstone of peacebuilding efforts in societies emerging from conflict. Yet, to date, the view of victims in post-conflict societies concerning such arrangements remains highly anecdotal and often second-hand in nature. Mindful of this omission and using Northern Ireland as a case study, this article investigates the views of victims towards a range of mechanisms to deal with the legacy of Northern Ireland's violent past. Based on the 2011 Northern Ireland Social and Political Attitudes Survey, the results suggest some marked divisions in relation to this issue, with victims within the Catholic community being significantly more supportive of such initiatives than either Protestants or those with no religion. Moreover, while perceptions of victimhood emerge as the key predictor of attitudes among Protestants and the non-affiliated, general opinions on how to deal with the past are the key determinant of views among members of the Catholic community.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51479,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","volume":"17 3","pages":"512-530"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1467-856X.12050","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Victimhood and Attitudes towards Dealing with the Legacy of a Violent Past: Northern Ireland as a Case Study\",\"authors\":\"John D. Brewer,&nbsp;Bernadette C. Hayes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-856X.12050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Using Northern Ireland as a case study, this article provides the first nationally representative and systematic study of victims' views on how to deal with the past;</li>\\n \\n <li>Focusing specifically on Northern Ireland, it both investigates and provides a comprehensive account of the marked divisions between the various religious groupings—Protestants, Catholics and the non-affiliated—in terms of a range of truth recovery mechanisms to deal with legacy of its violent past;</li>\\n \\n <li>It empirically investigates and validates two key predictors—perceptions of victimhood and general attitudes towards the past—in determining the source of these divisions</li>\\n \\n <li>It outlines the implications of our findings for other societies emerging from conflict.</li>\\n </ul>\\n <p>Truth recovery mechanisms have become a cornerstone of peacebuilding efforts in societies emerging from conflict. Yet, to date, the view of victims in post-conflict societies concerning such arrangements remains highly anecdotal and often second-hand in nature. Mindful of this omission and using Northern Ireland as a case study, this article investigates the views of victims towards a range of mechanisms to deal with the legacy of Northern Ireland's violent past. Based on the 2011 Northern Ireland Social and Political Attitudes Survey, the results suggest some marked divisions in relation to this issue, with victims within the Catholic community being significantly more supportive of such initiatives than either Protestants or those with no religion. Moreover, while perceptions of victimhood emerge as the key predictor of attitudes among Protestants and the non-affiliated, general opinions on how to deal with the past are the key determinant of views among members of the Catholic community.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Politics & International Relations\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"512-530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1467-856X.12050\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Politics & International Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-856X.12050\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-856X.12050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

本文以北爱尔兰为个案,首次对受害者如何面对过去的观点进行了具有全国代表性的系统研究;本书特别关注北爱尔兰,调查并全面描述了不同宗教团体之间的明显分歧——新教徒、天主教徒和非宗教团体——以一系列真相恢复机制来处理其暴力过去的遗留问题;在确定这些分歧的来源时,它实证地调查并验证了两个关键的预测因素——对受害者的看法和对过去的普遍态度。它概述了我们的发现对其他从冲突中崛起的社会的影响。真相复原机制已成为冲突后社会建设和平努力的基石。然而,到目前为止,冲突后社会的受害者对这种安排的看法仍然是道听途说,而且往往是二手的。考虑到这一遗漏并以北爱尔兰为案例研究,本文调查了受害者对一系列机制的看法,以处理北爱尔兰暴力过去的遗产。根据2011年北爱尔兰社会和政治态度调查,结果表明在这个问题上存在一些明显的分歧,天主教徒社区的受害者比新教徒或无宗教信仰的人更支持这些倡议。此外,对受害者的看法是新教徒和非信徒态度的关键预测因素,而如何处理过去的一般意见是天主教社区成员观点的关键决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Victimhood and Attitudes towards Dealing with the Legacy of a Violent Past: Northern Ireland as a Case Study

  • Using Northern Ireland as a case study, this article provides the first nationally representative and systematic study of victims' views on how to deal with the past;
  • Focusing specifically on Northern Ireland, it both investigates and provides a comprehensive account of the marked divisions between the various religious groupings—Protestants, Catholics and the non-affiliated—in terms of a range of truth recovery mechanisms to deal with legacy of its violent past;
  • It empirically investigates and validates two key predictors—perceptions of victimhood and general attitudes towards the past—in determining the source of these divisions
  • It outlines the implications of our findings for other societies emerging from conflict.

Truth recovery mechanisms have become a cornerstone of peacebuilding efforts in societies emerging from conflict. Yet, to date, the view of victims in post-conflict societies concerning such arrangements remains highly anecdotal and often second-hand in nature. Mindful of this omission and using Northern Ireland as a case study, this article investigates the views of victims towards a range of mechanisms to deal with the legacy of Northern Ireland's violent past. Based on the 2011 Northern Ireland Social and Political Attitudes Survey, the results suggest some marked divisions in relation to this issue, with victims within the Catholic community being significantly more supportive of such initiatives than either Protestants or those with no religion. Moreover, while perceptions of victimhood emerge as the key predictor of attitudes among Protestants and the non-affiliated, general opinions on how to deal with the past are the key determinant of views among members of the Catholic community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: BJPIR provides an outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain Founded in 1999, BJPIR is now based in the School of Politics at the University of Nottingham. It is a major refereed journal published by Blackwell Publishing under the auspices of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom. BJPIR is committed to acting as a broadly-based outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain. A fully refereed journal, it publishes topical, scholarly work on significant debates in British scholarship and on all major political issues affecting Britain"s relationship to Europe and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信