货运铁路应用的移动WiMAX 2.5 GHz和3.65 GHz对比分析

P. Shrestha, M. Hempel, H. Sharif, S. Mehrvarzi
{"title":"货运铁路应用的移动WiMAX 2.5 GHz和3.65 GHz对比分析","authors":"P. Shrestha, M. Hempel, H. Sharif, S. Mehrvarzi","doi":"10.1109/INNOVATIONS.2013.6544416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"North America's railroads are exploring opportunities to modernize their wireless communication infrastructure. Mobile WiMAX is considered a candidate for such deployment. The Federal Communication Commission issues licenses for Mobile WiMAX in several bands, among which 2.5 GHz and 3.65 GHz are the most popular. 2.5 GHz provides less operating restrictions while 3.65 GHz has more attractive licensing requirements. Therefore, it is imperative to compare the performances for both spectrums to ascertain the best fit with regards to performance and cost. In this paper, we provide a thorough quantitative comparison between the two spectrums and an in-depth analysis of the results.","PeriodicalId":438270,"journal":{"name":"2013 9th International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of Mobile WiMAX 2.5 GHz and 3.65 GHz for freight railroad applications\",\"authors\":\"P. Shrestha, M. Hempel, H. Sharif, S. Mehrvarzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INNOVATIONS.2013.6544416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"North America's railroads are exploring opportunities to modernize their wireless communication infrastructure. Mobile WiMAX is considered a candidate for such deployment. The Federal Communication Commission issues licenses for Mobile WiMAX in several bands, among which 2.5 GHz and 3.65 GHz are the most popular. 2.5 GHz provides less operating restrictions while 3.65 GHz has more attractive licensing requirements. Therefore, it is imperative to compare the performances for both spectrums to ascertain the best fit with regards to performance and cost. In this paper, we provide a thorough quantitative comparison between the two spectrums and an in-depth analysis of the results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 9th International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 9th International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INNOVATIONS.2013.6544416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 9th International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INNOVATIONS.2013.6544416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

北美的铁路公司正在探索使其无线通信基础设施现代化的机会。移动WiMAX被认为是这种部署的备选方案。美国联邦通信委员会在几个频段颁发移动WiMAX许可证,其中最受欢迎的是2.5 GHz和3.65 GHz。2.5 GHz提供较少的操作限制,而3.65 GHz具有更具吸引力的许可要求。因此,必须比较两个频谱的性能,以确定性能和成本方面的最佳匹配。在本文中,我们对两种光谱进行了全面的定量比较,并对结果进行了深入的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of Mobile WiMAX 2.5 GHz and 3.65 GHz for freight railroad applications
North America's railroads are exploring opportunities to modernize their wireless communication infrastructure. Mobile WiMAX is considered a candidate for such deployment. The Federal Communication Commission issues licenses for Mobile WiMAX in several bands, among which 2.5 GHz and 3.65 GHz are the most popular. 2.5 GHz provides less operating restrictions while 3.65 GHz has more attractive licensing requirements. Therefore, it is imperative to compare the performances for both spectrums to ascertain the best fit with regards to performance and cost. In this paper, we provide a thorough quantitative comparison between the two spectrums and an in-depth analysis of the results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信