女生培养vs.进入工程领域:工程拓展项目的女生夏令营与男女混合工程夏令营的比较

Dr. Lynn Peterson, Dr. Carter Tiernan, Lynard Broussard
{"title":"女生培养vs.进入工程领域:工程拓展项目的女生夏令营与男女混合工程夏令营的比较","authors":"Dr. Lynn Peterson, Dr. Carter Tiernan, Lynard Broussard","doi":"10.18260/1-2-620-38627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper will provide a comparison of two one-week long engineering summer day camps that were held in Summer 2008 by the College of Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington. One camp was a coeducational camp called Entry to Engineering for students entering 6 th , 7 th , or 8 th grades in Fall 2008. This camp is part of the UTA Engineering and Computer Science Summer Camps that have been running since 1998. The second camp was a newly inaugurated camp called Girlgeneering. This camp was for girls entering the 6 th , 7 th , 8 th or 9 th grades in Fall 2008. The new Girlgeneering camp was modeled after the structure of the Entry to Engineering camp with some specific modifications for its audience that will be discussed. In the paper we will discuss the goals for the two camps, the differences in the planning for the camps, and the staffing for the camps. We will also talk about our rationale for the ways in which the camps were planned differently. We will then talk about the ways in which the camps themselves were similar and were different in a variety of areas including student engagement, development of student subgroups (cliques), camper behavior, responses to camp activities, and other topics. We will include qualitative feedback from the campers and from staffers about the camps. We will close with a discussion of the benefits of the two types of camps and our plans for the future. The paper will be co-authored by the faculty camp director, the staff member camp assistant director, and will include comments from student camp staffers.","PeriodicalId":175579,"journal":{"name":"2009 GSW Proceedings","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Girlgeneering vs. Entry to Engineering: Engineering Outreach Program Comparison of a Girls-Only vs. Co-Ed Engineering Summer Camp\",\"authors\":\"Dr. Lynn Peterson, Dr. Carter Tiernan, Lynard Broussard\",\"doi\":\"10.18260/1-2-620-38627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper will provide a comparison of two one-week long engineering summer day camps that were held in Summer 2008 by the College of Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington. One camp was a coeducational camp called Entry to Engineering for students entering 6 th , 7 th , or 8 th grades in Fall 2008. This camp is part of the UTA Engineering and Computer Science Summer Camps that have been running since 1998. The second camp was a newly inaugurated camp called Girlgeneering. This camp was for girls entering the 6 th , 7 th , 8 th or 9 th grades in Fall 2008. The new Girlgeneering camp was modeled after the structure of the Entry to Engineering camp with some specific modifications for its audience that will be discussed. In the paper we will discuss the goals for the two camps, the differences in the planning for the camps, and the staffing for the camps. We will also talk about our rationale for the ways in which the camps were planned differently. We will then talk about the ways in which the camps themselves were similar and were different in a variety of areas including student engagement, development of student subgroups (cliques), camper behavior, responses to camp activities, and other topics. We will include qualitative feedback from the campers and from staffers about the camps. We will close with a discussion of the benefits of the two types of camps and our plans for the future. The paper will be co-authored by the faculty camp director, the staff member camp assistant director, and will include comments from student camp staffers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 GSW Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 GSW Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-620-38627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 GSW Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-620-38627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文将提供2008年夏季由位于阿灵顿的德克萨斯大学工程学院举办的两个为期一周的工程夏令营的比较。其中一个营是男女同校营,名为“工程入门”,面向2008年秋季进入六、七、八年级的学生。这个夏令营是UTA工程和计算机科学夏令营的一部分,该夏令营自1998年以来一直在运行。第二个营地是一个新成立的营地,叫做“女孩培育”。这个夏令营是为2008年秋季进入六年级,七年级,八年级或九年级的女孩准备的。新的女生训练营是模仿工程入门训练营的结构,并为其受众进行了一些具体的修改,这将在后面讨论。在本文中,我们将讨论两个营地的目标,营地规划的差异,以及营地的人员配备。我们还将讨论我们对不同营地规划方式的基本原理。然后,我们将讨论夏令营本身的相似之处和不同之处,包括学生的参与、学生小组(小团体)的发展、露营者的行为、对夏令营活动的反应以及其他主题。我们将包括露营者和工作人员对营地的定性反馈。最后,我们将讨论这两种类型的营地的好处和我们未来的计划。该论文将由教师营地主任,工作人员营地助理主任共同撰写,并将包括学生营地工作人员的评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Girlgeneering vs. Entry to Engineering: Engineering Outreach Program Comparison of a Girls-Only vs. Co-Ed Engineering Summer Camp
This paper will provide a comparison of two one-week long engineering summer day camps that were held in Summer 2008 by the College of Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington. One camp was a coeducational camp called Entry to Engineering for students entering 6 th , 7 th , or 8 th grades in Fall 2008. This camp is part of the UTA Engineering and Computer Science Summer Camps that have been running since 1998. The second camp was a newly inaugurated camp called Girlgeneering. This camp was for girls entering the 6 th , 7 th , 8 th or 9 th grades in Fall 2008. The new Girlgeneering camp was modeled after the structure of the Entry to Engineering camp with some specific modifications for its audience that will be discussed. In the paper we will discuss the goals for the two camps, the differences in the planning for the camps, and the staffing for the camps. We will also talk about our rationale for the ways in which the camps were planned differently. We will then talk about the ways in which the camps themselves were similar and were different in a variety of areas including student engagement, development of student subgroups (cliques), camper behavior, responses to camp activities, and other topics. We will include qualitative feedback from the campers and from staffers about the camps. We will close with a discussion of the benefits of the two types of camps and our plans for the future. The paper will be co-authored by the faculty camp director, the staff member camp assistant director, and will include comments from student camp staffers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信