与计算机安全和隐私相关的熟练或容易受骗的性别刻板印象

Miranda Wei, Pardis Emami Naeini, Franziska Roesner, Tadayoshi Kohno
{"title":"与计算机安全和隐私相关的熟练或容易受骗的性别刻板印象","authors":"Miranda Wei, Pardis Emami Naeini, Franziska Roesner, Tadayoshi Kohno","doi":"10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender stereotypes remain common in U.S. society and harm people of all genders. Focusing on binary genders (women and men) as a first investigation, we empirically study gender stereotypes related to computer security and privacy. We used Prolific to conduct two surveys with U.S. participants that aimed to: (1) surface potential gender stereotypes related to security and privacy (N = 202), and (2) assess belief in gender stereotypes about security and privacy engagement, personal characteristics, and behaviors (N = 190). We find that stereotype beliefs are significantly correlated with participants’ gender as well as level of sexism, and we delve into the justifications our participants offered for their beliefs. Beyond scientifically studying the existence and prevalence of such stereotypes, we describe potential implications, including biasing crowdworker-faciliated user research. Further, our work lays a foundation for deeper investigations of the impacts of stereotypes in computer security and privacy, as well as stereotypes across the whole gender and identity spectrum.","PeriodicalId":439989,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skilled or Gullibleƒ Gender Stereotypes Related to Computer Security and Privacy\",\"authors\":\"Miranda Wei, Pardis Emami Naeini, Franziska Roesner, Tadayoshi Kohno\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gender stereotypes remain common in U.S. society and harm people of all genders. Focusing on binary genders (women and men) as a first investigation, we empirically study gender stereotypes related to computer security and privacy. We used Prolific to conduct two surveys with U.S. participants that aimed to: (1) surface potential gender stereotypes related to security and privacy (N = 202), and (2) assess belief in gender stereotypes about security and privacy engagement, personal characteristics, and behaviors (N = 190). We find that stereotype beliefs are significantly correlated with participants’ gender as well as level of sexism, and we delve into the justifications our participants offered for their beliefs. Beyond scientifically studying the existence and prevalence of such stereotypes, we describe potential implications, including biasing crowdworker-faciliated user research. Further, our work lays a foundation for deeper investigations of the impacts of stereotypes in computer security and privacy, as well as stereotypes across the whole gender and identity spectrum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":439989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

性别刻板印象在美国社会仍然普遍存在,并伤害到所有性别的人。本文首先以二元性别(女性和男性)为研究对象,实证研究了与计算机安全和隐私相关的性别刻板印象。我们使用多产工具对美国参与者进行了两项调查,旨在:(1)揭示与安全和隐私相关的潜在性别刻板印象(N = 202);(2)评估对安全和隐私参与、个人特征和行为的性别刻板印象(N = 190)。我们发现刻板印象信念与参与者的性别和性别歧视程度显著相关,我们深入研究了参与者为他们的信念提供的理由。除了科学地研究这种刻板印象的存在和流行之外,我们还描述了潜在的影响,包括偏向众工的用户研究。此外,我们的工作为深入研究刻板印象对计算机安全和隐私的影响,以及对整个性别和身份谱系的刻板印象奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Skilled or Gullibleƒ Gender Stereotypes Related to Computer Security and Privacy
Gender stereotypes remain common in U.S. society and harm people of all genders. Focusing on binary genders (women and men) as a first investigation, we empirically study gender stereotypes related to computer security and privacy. We used Prolific to conduct two surveys with U.S. participants that aimed to: (1) surface potential gender stereotypes related to security and privacy (N = 202), and (2) assess belief in gender stereotypes about security and privacy engagement, personal characteristics, and behaviors (N = 190). We find that stereotype beliefs are significantly correlated with participants’ gender as well as level of sexism, and we delve into the justifications our participants offered for their beliefs. Beyond scientifically studying the existence and prevalence of such stereotypes, we describe potential implications, including biasing crowdworker-faciliated user research. Further, our work lays a foundation for deeper investigations of the impacts of stereotypes in computer security and privacy, as well as stereotypes across the whole gender and identity spectrum.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信