使用基于网络的系统来探索基于问题的学习教程中的同伴、自我和导师评估

Yan Liang, Qing Wang, Yingqing Lu, Ruizhe Qian, Yiqing Yin
{"title":"使用基于网络的系统来探索基于问题的学习教程中的同伴、自我和导师评估","authors":"Yan Liang, Qing Wang, Yingqing Lu, Ruizhe Qian, Yiqing Yin","doi":"10.1109/ITIME.2011.6130827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore self-, peer-, and tutor assessment of performance in tutorials among medical students in a problem-based learning curriculum. Methods: 117 students enrolled in the third year of the Doctor of Medicine Program at Fudan University were recruited to participate in a study of self, peer, and tutor assessment. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected from the assessment of PBL performance within the tutorial setting. Results: The students scored themselves and peer higher than their tutor. The Bland Altman plots showed both self and peer scores agreed well with tutor scores. However, the correlation between self and tutor scores, between peer-averaged and tutor scores, both showed no statistical significance. Conclusion: Self and peer assessment showed poor accuracy but they had the potential to enhance students' self- awareness, reflection ability, and their ability to evaluate.","PeriodicalId":170838,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a web-based system to explore peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials\",\"authors\":\"Yan Liang, Qing Wang, Yingqing Lu, Ruizhe Qian, Yiqing Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITIME.2011.6130827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore self-, peer-, and tutor assessment of performance in tutorials among medical students in a problem-based learning curriculum. Methods: 117 students enrolled in the third year of the Doctor of Medicine Program at Fudan University were recruited to participate in a study of self, peer, and tutor assessment. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected from the assessment of PBL performance within the tutorial setting. Results: The students scored themselves and peer higher than their tutor. The Bland Altman plots showed both self and peer scores agreed well with tutor scores. However, the correlation between self and tutor scores, between peer-averaged and tutor scores, both showed no statistical significance. Conclusion: Self and peer assessment showed poor accuracy but they had the potential to enhance students' self- awareness, reflection ability, and their ability to evaluate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE International Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE International Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITIME.2011.6130827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITIME.2011.6130827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要目的:本研究旨在探讨医学生在问题型学习课程中,自我、同侪及导师对辅导表现的评估。方法:选取复旦大学医学博士三年级117名学生进行自我评估、同伴评估和导师评估。定量和定性数据均收集自教学环境下PBL表现的评估。结果:学生对自己和同伴的评分高于导师。Bland Altman图表显示,自我和同伴得分与导师得分一致。而自我得分与导师得分、同侪平均分与导师得分的相关均无统计学意义。结论:自我评价和同伴评价的准确性较差,但具有提高学生自我意识、反思能力和评价能力的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using a web-based system to explore peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials
Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore self-, peer-, and tutor assessment of performance in tutorials among medical students in a problem-based learning curriculum. Methods: 117 students enrolled in the third year of the Doctor of Medicine Program at Fudan University were recruited to participate in a study of self, peer, and tutor assessment. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected from the assessment of PBL performance within the tutorial setting. Results: The students scored themselves and peer higher than their tutor. The Bland Altman plots showed both self and peer scores agreed well with tutor scores. However, the correlation between self and tutor scores, between peer-averaged and tutor scores, both showed no statistical significance. Conclusion: Self and peer assessment showed poor accuracy but they had the potential to enhance students' self- awareness, reflection ability, and their ability to evaluate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信