{"title":"乌克兰DRDSI试点项目的经验教训","authors":"V. Chabaniuk, O. Dyshlyk, A. Tarnopolskiy","doi":"10.33841/1819-1339-2-44-69-81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work considers practical examples of processes realization of product-process model of the National (N) Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI, together – NSDI) of Ukraine [Chabaniuk, Dyshlyk, 2021], which meet two of the four dynamic principles of the latter building [Chabaniuk, 2018]. They were obtained in 2016 as part of pilot projects (pilots) of the regional European project to create the so-called Danube Reference Data and Services Infrastructure [DRDSI, Dusart, et al., 2016]. Pilots were implemented for the territory of 3 districts of Odessa region of Ukraine adjacent to Moldova. Despite the 6 years that have passed since then, these results not only remain, but become even more actual. The growing actuality is explained by several reasons, among which the most important are three: 1) [Law of Ukraine “About NGDI”, 2020] noncompliance with the recommendations (requirements) of INSPIRE; 2) inconsistency of the SDI (Spatial Data Infrustructure) model enshrined in the said Law with the Ukrainian reality; 3) the needs of practice. The results of the work are useful for determining [Law of Ukraine “About NGDI”, 2020] changes, the model of which must be changed to “correct” and “feasible” [Chabaniuk, Dyshlyk, 2021]. Due to the use of open technologies in pilots, the latter can be used in practical projects without the cost of purchasing commercial software.","PeriodicalId":422474,"journal":{"name":"Modern achievements of geodesic science and industry","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons of DRDSI pilot projects in Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"V. Chabaniuk, O. Dyshlyk, A. Tarnopolskiy\",\"doi\":\"10.33841/1819-1339-2-44-69-81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The work considers practical examples of processes realization of product-process model of the National (N) Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI, together – NSDI) of Ukraine [Chabaniuk, Dyshlyk, 2021], which meet two of the four dynamic principles of the latter building [Chabaniuk, 2018]. They were obtained in 2016 as part of pilot projects (pilots) of the regional European project to create the so-called Danube Reference Data and Services Infrastructure [DRDSI, Dusart, et al., 2016]. Pilots were implemented for the territory of 3 districts of Odessa region of Ukraine adjacent to Moldova. Despite the 6 years that have passed since then, these results not only remain, but become even more actual. The growing actuality is explained by several reasons, among which the most important are three: 1) [Law of Ukraine “About NGDI”, 2020] noncompliance with the recommendations (requirements) of INSPIRE; 2) inconsistency of the SDI (Spatial Data Infrustructure) model enshrined in the said Law with the Ukrainian reality; 3) the needs of practice. The results of the work are useful for determining [Law of Ukraine “About NGDI”, 2020] changes, the model of which must be changed to “correct” and “feasible” [Chabaniuk, Dyshlyk, 2021]. Due to the use of open technologies in pilots, the latter can be used in practical projects without the cost of purchasing commercial software.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern achievements of geodesic science and industry\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern achievements of geodesic science and industry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33841/1819-1339-2-44-69-81\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern achievements of geodesic science and industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33841/1819-1339-2-44-69-81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
该工作考虑了乌克兰国家(N)空间数据基础设施(SDI, together - NSDI)产品-过程模型过程实现的实际示例[Chabaniuk, Dyshlyk, 2021],该模型符合后一种建筑的四个动态原则中的两个[Chabaniuk, 2018]。这些数据是在2016年获得的,作为欧洲区域项目的试点项目(试点)的一部分,该项目旨在创建所谓的多瑙河参考数据和服务基础设施[DRDSI, Dusart等,2016]。在与摩尔多瓦相邻的乌克兰敖德萨地区的3个地区实施了试点。尽管6年过去了,这些结果不仅没有改变,而且变得更加真实。日益增长的现状有几个原因,其中最重要的有三个原因:1)[乌克兰法律“关于NGDI”,2020]不符合INSPIRE的建议(要求);2)上述法律中规定的SDI(空间数据基础设施)模式与乌克兰现实不一致;3)实践的需要。工作结果有助于确定[乌克兰法“关于NGDI”,2020]的变化,其模型必须更改为“正确”和“可行”[Chabaniuk, Dyshlyk, 2021]。由于在试点中使用了开放技术,后者可以在实际项目中使用,而无需购买商业软件的成本。
The work considers practical examples of processes realization of product-process model of the National (N) Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI, together – NSDI) of Ukraine [Chabaniuk, Dyshlyk, 2021], which meet two of the four dynamic principles of the latter building [Chabaniuk, 2018]. They were obtained in 2016 as part of pilot projects (pilots) of the regional European project to create the so-called Danube Reference Data and Services Infrastructure [DRDSI, Dusart, et al., 2016]. Pilots were implemented for the territory of 3 districts of Odessa region of Ukraine adjacent to Moldova. Despite the 6 years that have passed since then, these results not only remain, but become even more actual. The growing actuality is explained by several reasons, among which the most important are three: 1) [Law of Ukraine “About NGDI”, 2020] noncompliance with the recommendations (requirements) of INSPIRE; 2) inconsistency of the SDI (Spatial Data Infrustructure) model enshrined in the said Law with the Ukrainian reality; 3) the needs of practice. The results of the work are useful for determining [Law of Ukraine “About NGDI”, 2020] changes, the model of which must be changed to “correct” and “feasible” [Chabaniuk, Dyshlyk, 2021]. Due to the use of open technologies in pilots, the latter can be used in practical projects without the cost of purchasing commercial software.