{"title":"联合稀疏多测量向量恢复的MMV子空间追踪算法","authors":"Sujuan Liu, Lili Zheng, Lei Liu, Qianjin Lin","doi":"10.1109/ASICON47005.2019.8983646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, MMV Subspace Pursuit (M-SP) algorithm is proposed for solving joint sparse multiple measurement vectors (MMV) problem. The pre-selection and backtracking mechanisms are used in M-SP, so M-SP not only has higher recovery performance than some existing algorithms, but also significantly reduces the iteration number for improving the signal recovery efficiency. Simulations results show that M-SP and Simultaneous Compressive Sampling Matching Pursuit (SCoSaMP) have almost identical recovery performance and iteration times, but M-SP significantly reduces the computation complexity in per iteration. For example, when sparsity $K$ is 5, the computational complexity of M-SP is 24.0% of that of SCoSaMP in each iteration.","PeriodicalId":319342,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on ASIC (ASICON)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MMV Subspace Pursuit (M-SP) Algorithm for Joint Sparse Multiple Measurement Vectors Recovery\",\"authors\":\"Sujuan Liu, Lili Zheng, Lei Liu, Qianjin Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASICON47005.2019.8983646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, MMV Subspace Pursuit (M-SP) algorithm is proposed for solving joint sparse multiple measurement vectors (MMV) problem. The pre-selection and backtracking mechanisms are used in M-SP, so M-SP not only has higher recovery performance than some existing algorithms, but also significantly reduces the iteration number for improving the signal recovery efficiency. Simulations results show that M-SP and Simultaneous Compressive Sampling Matching Pursuit (SCoSaMP) have almost identical recovery performance and iteration times, but M-SP significantly reduces the computation complexity in per iteration. For example, when sparsity $K$ is 5, the computational complexity of M-SP is 24.0% of that of SCoSaMP in each iteration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on ASIC (ASICON)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on ASIC (ASICON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASICON47005.2019.8983646\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on ASIC (ASICON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASICON47005.2019.8983646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this paper, MMV Subspace Pursuit (M-SP) algorithm is proposed for solving joint sparse multiple measurement vectors (MMV) problem. The pre-selection and backtracking mechanisms are used in M-SP, so M-SP not only has higher recovery performance than some existing algorithms, but also significantly reduces the iteration number for improving the signal recovery efficiency. Simulations results show that M-SP and Simultaneous Compressive Sampling Matching Pursuit (SCoSaMP) have almost identical recovery performance and iteration times, but M-SP significantly reduces the computation complexity in per iteration. For example, when sparsity $K$ is 5, the computational complexity of M-SP is 24.0% of that of SCoSaMP in each iteration.