格鲁吉亚版五大问卷的心理测量特性

K. Martskvishvili, Natia Sordia, A. Neubauer
{"title":"格鲁吉亚版五大问卷的心理测量特性","authors":"K. Martskvishvili, Natia Sordia, A. Neubauer","doi":"10.52340/gpj.2022.07.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of the study is to examine the psychometric properties of the Georgian versions of the Big Five Inventory (BFI; John & Strivastava, 1999) and the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI; Gosling, Rentfrow, & Swann, 2003), the two instruments measuring the Big Five model. 866 individuals participated in the study examining the Georgian version of BFI and 377 individuals in the development of the Georgian version of TIPI. According to the results, the factor structure of both instruments replicates the five-factor model observed in other cultures. The reliability coefficients correspond to the minimum levels recommended for personality questionnaires/inventories. However, these levels turned out to be lower for TIPI. The instrument validity is proved by their logical correlations with the theoretically relevant constructs, namely with the Six-Factor model, aversive personality traits, and emotional intelligence. We can conclude that due to the factor structure, expected relationships with other constructs and statistical significance, the Georgian versions of both instruments measuring the Big Five can be used for future research.","PeriodicalId":271322,"journal":{"name":"GEORGIAN PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE GEORGIAN VERSIONS OF THE BIG FIVE QUESTIONNAIRES\",\"authors\":\"K. Martskvishvili, Natia Sordia, A. Neubauer\",\"doi\":\"10.52340/gpj.2022.07.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of the study is to examine the psychometric properties of the Georgian versions of the Big Five Inventory (BFI; John & Strivastava, 1999) and the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI; Gosling, Rentfrow, & Swann, 2003), the two instruments measuring the Big Five model. 866 individuals participated in the study examining the Georgian version of BFI and 377 individuals in the development of the Georgian version of TIPI. According to the results, the factor structure of both instruments replicates the five-factor model observed in other cultures. The reliability coefficients correspond to the minimum levels recommended for personality questionnaires/inventories. However, these levels turned out to be lower for TIPI. The instrument validity is proved by their logical correlations with the theoretically relevant constructs, namely with the Six-Factor model, aversive personality traits, and emotional intelligence. We can conclude that due to the factor structure, expected relationships with other constructs and statistical significance, the Georgian versions of both instruments measuring the Big Five can be used for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GEORGIAN PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GEORGIAN PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52340/gpj.2022.07.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GEORGIAN PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52340/gpj.2022.07.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究的目的是检验格鲁吉亚版本的大五量表(BFI;John & Strivastava, 1999)和十项人格量表(TIPI;Gosling, Rentfrow, & Swann, 2003),测量五大模型的两种仪器。866人参与了格鲁吉亚版BFI的研究,377人参与了格鲁吉亚版TIPI的开发。根据结果,两种仪器的因子结构重复了在其他培养中观察到的五因子模型。信度系数对应于人格问卷/量表推荐的最低水平。然而,这些水平被证明是较低的TIPI。通过与六因素模型、厌恶人格特质和情绪智力等理论相关构念的逻辑相关性,证明了工具的有效性。我们可以得出结论,由于因素结构,与其他构念的预期关系和统计显著性,格鲁吉亚版本的两种测量五大的工具可以用于未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE GEORGIAN VERSIONS OF THE BIG FIVE QUESTIONNAIRES
The goal of the study is to examine the psychometric properties of the Georgian versions of the Big Five Inventory (BFI; John & Strivastava, 1999) and the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI; Gosling, Rentfrow, & Swann, 2003), the two instruments measuring the Big Five model. 866 individuals participated in the study examining the Georgian version of BFI and 377 individuals in the development of the Georgian version of TIPI. According to the results, the factor structure of both instruments replicates the five-factor model observed in other cultures. The reliability coefficients correspond to the minimum levels recommended for personality questionnaires/inventories. However, these levels turned out to be lower for TIPI. The instrument validity is proved by their logical correlations with the theoretically relevant constructs, namely with the Six-Factor model, aversive personality traits, and emotional intelligence. We can conclude that due to the factor structure, expected relationships with other constructs and statistical significance, the Georgian versions of both instruments measuring the Big Five can be used for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信