盈余风险与异质预期盈余概况

Scott Drewianka, P. Oberg
{"title":"盈余风险与异质预期盈余概况","authors":"Scott Drewianka, P. Oberg","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3630330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We add to the debate about whether empirical models of earnings dynamics should allow for unobservable heterogeneity in expected earnings growth rates by considering the consequences for estimating the variance of earnings shocks. Several tests are proposed, some that extend and augment earlier evidence, and some entirely new. In every case, empirical evidence from the Panel Study on Income Dynamics favors models lacking such heterogeneity. Such models invariably indicate workers face greater risk of permanent earnings shocks, implying much of the dispersion in lifetime earnings may not be predictable ex-ante.","PeriodicalId":149805,"journal":{"name":"Labor: Demographics & Economics of the Family eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Earnings Risk and Heterogeneous Expected Earnings Profiles\",\"authors\":\"Scott Drewianka, P. Oberg\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3630330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We add to the debate about whether empirical models of earnings dynamics should allow for unobservable heterogeneity in expected earnings growth rates by considering the consequences for estimating the variance of earnings shocks. Several tests are proposed, some that extend and augment earlier evidence, and some entirely new. In every case, empirical evidence from the Panel Study on Income Dynamics favors models lacking such heterogeneity. Such models invariably indicate workers face greater risk of permanent earnings shocks, implying much of the dispersion in lifetime earnings may not be predictable ex-ante.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labor: Demographics & Economics of the Family eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labor: Demographics & Economics of the Family eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3630330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor: Demographics & Economics of the Family eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3630330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们加入了关于盈余动态的实证模型是否应该通过考虑估计盈余冲击方差的后果来考虑预期盈余增长率中不可观察的异质性的争论。提出了几种测试方法,有些是对早期证据的扩展和补充,有些则是全新的。在每种情况下,来自收入动态小组研究的经验证据都倾向于缺乏这种异质性的模型。这些模型无一例外地表明,工人面临永久性收入冲击的风险更大,这意味着终身收入的差异在很大程度上可能无法事先预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Earnings Risk and Heterogeneous Expected Earnings Profiles
We add to the debate about whether empirical models of earnings dynamics should allow for unobservable heterogeneity in expected earnings growth rates by considering the consequences for estimating the variance of earnings shocks. Several tests are proposed, some that extend and augment earlier evidence, and some entirely new. In every case, empirical evidence from the Panel Study on Income Dynamics favors models lacking such heterogeneity. Such models invariably indicate workers face greater risk of permanent earnings shocks, implying much of the dispersion in lifetime earnings may not be predictable ex-ante.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信