通过历史性能数据分析提高建井/修井时间和成本估算的准确性

Mirian Kosi Orji, Toyin Arowosafe, John Agiaye
{"title":"通过历史性能数据分析提高建井/修井时间和成本估算的准确性","authors":"Mirian Kosi Orji, Toyin Arowosafe, John Agiaye","doi":"10.2118/217196-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Time and cost estimation and the accuracy of it, are central to engineering design and forms the basis for economic analysis of projects. There are several factors that could result in cost or schedule overruns ranging from unplanned non-productive time, inefficiencies, changes in macro indices etcetera; however, one often overlooked factor is deficient time and cost estimation. Hence in addition to factoring prevailing market and contract rates for materials and services, it is important to critically analyze and benchmark plans against known performance for higher accuracy around estimations.\n Well project time and cost models generally consist of estimating in modules or sub-phases and aggregating these modules to makeup the total. This can either result in a single discrete estimate or in ranges based on probability and statistical performance - inherently implying that some form of historic performance is crucial to the estimation accuracy. This paper describes a structured approach to developing a probabilistic estimation tool by analyzing past performance data at a phase or subphase level. This tool can be domiciled on a range of computation platforms using similar methodology, which comprises data collection from execution reports, data cleanup and organization to harmonize terminologies and group operation types, and finally statistical and mathematical data analysis. Statistical analysis develops probabilistic relationships in the dataset and correlation between performance variables such as depth and time; while mathematical analysis incorporates numerical correlations and multiple variables to generate estimates in modules and finally aggregates the discrete phase estimates.\n The estimation has two major components – Time and Cost.\n The analysis of time component considers the productive and non-productive time by phase; determines depth dependent operations and their correlation to time and assigns a mathematical function to each phase The cost component is broken down into two sub-components – recurrent cost which is highly time-dependent and non-recurrent (material and services) cost which are usually based on pre-defined contractual rates An additional end function is benchmarking, for comparison between estimates and historic performance\n The aggregate of the probabilistic estimate of each module gives the total estimate of time and cost for a given well construction or intervention scope, with the overall objective of improving and maintaining estimation accuracy to avoid overruns and over-estimation of drilling, completions, workover and intervention projects.","PeriodicalId":407977,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Well Construction/Intervention Time and Cost Estimation Accuracy Via Historical Performance Data Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mirian Kosi Orji, Toyin Arowosafe, John Agiaye\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/217196-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Time and cost estimation and the accuracy of it, are central to engineering design and forms the basis for economic analysis of projects. There are several factors that could result in cost or schedule overruns ranging from unplanned non-productive time, inefficiencies, changes in macro indices etcetera; however, one often overlooked factor is deficient time and cost estimation. Hence in addition to factoring prevailing market and contract rates for materials and services, it is important to critically analyze and benchmark plans against known performance for higher accuracy around estimations.\\n Well project time and cost models generally consist of estimating in modules or sub-phases and aggregating these modules to makeup the total. This can either result in a single discrete estimate or in ranges based on probability and statistical performance - inherently implying that some form of historic performance is crucial to the estimation accuracy. This paper describes a structured approach to developing a probabilistic estimation tool by analyzing past performance data at a phase or subphase level. This tool can be domiciled on a range of computation platforms using similar methodology, which comprises data collection from execution reports, data cleanup and organization to harmonize terminologies and group operation types, and finally statistical and mathematical data analysis. Statistical analysis develops probabilistic relationships in the dataset and correlation between performance variables such as depth and time; while mathematical analysis incorporates numerical correlations and multiple variables to generate estimates in modules and finally aggregates the discrete phase estimates.\\n The estimation has two major components – Time and Cost.\\n The analysis of time component considers the productive and non-productive time by phase; determines depth dependent operations and their correlation to time and assigns a mathematical function to each phase The cost component is broken down into two sub-components – recurrent cost which is highly time-dependent and non-recurrent (material and services) cost which are usually based on pre-defined contractual rates An additional end function is benchmarking, for comparison between estimates and historic performance\\n The aggregate of the probabilistic estimate of each module gives the total estimate of time and cost for a given well construction or intervention scope, with the overall objective of improving and maintaining estimation accuracy to avoid overruns and over-estimation of drilling, completions, workover and intervention projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/217196-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/217196-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

时间和成本估算及其准确性是工程设计的核心,也是项目经济分析的基础。有几个因素可能导致成本或进度超支,包括计划外的非生产时间、效率低下、宏观指标的变化等;然而,一个经常被忽视的因素是缺乏时间和成本估算。因此,除了考虑材料和服务的现行市场和合同费率外,重要的是要根据已知性能对计划进行批判性分析和基准测试,以获得更高的估计准确性。油井项目的时间和成本模型通常包括模块或子阶段的估算,并将这些模块汇总成总体。这可能导致单一的离散估计或基于概率和统计性能的范围-本质上意味着某种形式的历史性能对估计准确性至关重要。本文描述了一种结构化的方法,通过在阶段或子阶段级别上分析过去的性能数据来开发概率估计工具。该工具可以使用类似的方法在一系列计算平台上进行注册,其中包括从执行报告中收集数据、数据清理和组织以协调术语和组操作类型,以及最后的统计和数学数据分析。统计分析开发数据集中的概率关系和性能变量(如深度和时间)之间的相关性;而数学分析则结合数值相关性和多个变量在模块中产生估计,最后将离散相位估计汇总。估算有两个主要组成部分——时间和成本。时间分量分析按阶段考虑生产时间和非生产时间;确定与深度相关的作业及其与时间的关系,并为每个阶段分配一个数学函数。成本组成部分分为两个子部分-高度依赖时间的经常性成本和通常基于预先确定的合同费率的非经常性(材料和服务)成本。每个模块的概率估计的总和给出了给定井建设或修井范围的时间和成本的总体估计,其总体目标是提高和保持估计的准确性,以避免钻井、完井、修井和修井项目的超支和高估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Well Construction/Intervention Time and Cost Estimation Accuracy Via Historical Performance Data Analysis
Time and cost estimation and the accuracy of it, are central to engineering design and forms the basis for economic analysis of projects. There are several factors that could result in cost or schedule overruns ranging from unplanned non-productive time, inefficiencies, changes in macro indices etcetera; however, one often overlooked factor is deficient time and cost estimation. Hence in addition to factoring prevailing market and contract rates for materials and services, it is important to critically analyze and benchmark plans against known performance for higher accuracy around estimations. Well project time and cost models generally consist of estimating in modules or sub-phases and aggregating these modules to makeup the total. This can either result in a single discrete estimate or in ranges based on probability and statistical performance - inherently implying that some form of historic performance is crucial to the estimation accuracy. This paper describes a structured approach to developing a probabilistic estimation tool by analyzing past performance data at a phase or subphase level. This tool can be domiciled on a range of computation platforms using similar methodology, which comprises data collection from execution reports, data cleanup and organization to harmonize terminologies and group operation types, and finally statistical and mathematical data analysis. Statistical analysis develops probabilistic relationships in the dataset and correlation between performance variables such as depth and time; while mathematical analysis incorporates numerical correlations and multiple variables to generate estimates in modules and finally aggregates the discrete phase estimates. The estimation has two major components – Time and Cost. The analysis of time component considers the productive and non-productive time by phase; determines depth dependent operations and their correlation to time and assigns a mathematical function to each phase The cost component is broken down into two sub-components – recurrent cost which is highly time-dependent and non-recurrent (material and services) cost which are usually based on pre-defined contractual rates An additional end function is benchmarking, for comparison between estimates and historic performance The aggregate of the probabilistic estimate of each module gives the total estimate of time and cost for a given well construction or intervention scope, with the overall objective of improving and maintaining estimation accuracy to avoid overruns and over-estimation of drilling, completions, workover and intervention projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信