{"title":"比较法律史:富有成效的组合?","authors":"Bernardo Sordi","doi":"10.21708/issn2526-9488.v6.n11.p1-10.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text intends to discuss the limits and possibilities of Comparative legal history. Although it played an important informative role, the descriptive and na-tionalist legal comparison of the last century finds its limits today. The current Comparative legal history project takes on the new problems of spatial mapping of legal history beyond national histories. The new historical-comparative perspective must, therefore, attenuate the centralist perspective, which dimin-ishes the role of the peripheries and understands their history in terms of the center. Within the frame-work of a European history of public law, the methods are still being refined; cross-reads, improved and syn-chronized. The difficulties of this research project are many, imposed by chronologies, the different weights of political fractures, the question of borders and the difficult legacy of colonialism.Keywords:Comparative legal history; Research methodology in legal history; History of public law; Transnational aspects; European legal experience.*Professor Doutor Catedrático da Università degli Studi di Firenzi, Itália.bernardo.sordi@unifi.it**Doutor em Direito pela Universidade de Brasília. Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da UFERSA.Professor do IDP, Brasília.raphapeixoto@gmail.comRecebido em 14-7-2022|Aprovado em 14-7-202211Artigo convidado. Nota do tradutor:tradução autorizada pelo autor.Resumo e palavras-chaves elaboradaspelo tradutor.A versão original em italiano foi apresentada no Seminário Diritto: storia e comparazione,realizado","PeriodicalId":416966,"journal":{"name":"Revista Jurídica da UFERSA","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Legal History: uma combinação produtiva?\",\"authors\":\"Bernardo Sordi\",\"doi\":\"10.21708/issn2526-9488.v6.n11.p1-10.2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The text intends to discuss the limits and possibilities of Comparative legal history. Although it played an important informative role, the descriptive and na-tionalist legal comparison of the last century finds its limits today. The current Comparative legal history project takes on the new problems of spatial mapping of legal history beyond national histories. The new historical-comparative perspective must, therefore, attenuate the centralist perspective, which dimin-ishes the role of the peripheries and understands their history in terms of the center. Within the frame-work of a European history of public law, the methods are still being refined; cross-reads, improved and syn-chronized. The difficulties of this research project are many, imposed by chronologies, the different weights of political fractures, the question of borders and the difficult legacy of colonialism.Keywords:Comparative legal history; Research methodology in legal history; History of public law; Transnational aspects; European legal experience.*Professor Doutor Catedrático da Università degli Studi di Firenzi, Itália.bernardo.sordi@unifi.it**Doutor em Direito pela Universidade de Brasília. Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da UFERSA.Professor do IDP, Brasília.raphapeixoto@gmail.comRecebido em 14-7-2022|Aprovado em 14-7-202211Artigo convidado. Nota do tradutor:tradução autorizada pelo autor.Resumo e palavras-chaves elaboradaspelo tradutor.A versão original em italiano foi apresentada no Seminário Diritto: storia e comparazione,realizado\",\"PeriodicalId\":416966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Jurídica da UFERSA\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Jurídica da UFERSA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21708/issn2526-9488.v6.n11.p1-10.2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Jurídica da UFERSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21708/issn2526-9488.v6.n11.p1-10.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文旨在探讨比较法律史的局限性和可能性。虽然它发挥了重要的信息作用,但上个世纪的描述性和民族主义法律比较在今天发现了其局限性。当前的比较法律史项目承担了超越国家历史的法律史空间映射的新问题。因此,新的历史比较视角必须削弱中心主义视角,这种视角削弱了边缘地区的作用,并从中心的角度来理解它们的历史。在欧洲公法史的框架内,这些方法仍在不断完善;交叉读取,改进和同步。这个研究项目有很多困难,包括年代、政治分裂的不同权重、边界问题和殖民主义遗留问题。关键词:比较法制史;法律史研究方法论;公法史;跨国方面;欧洲法律经验。*Doutor教授Catedrático意大利佛罗伦萨大学(universit degli Studi di Firenzi) lia.bernardo.sordi@unifi.it**Doutor em Direito pela universitade de Brasília。教授项目Pós-Graduação em Direito da UFERSA。国内流离失所者教授,Brasília.raphapeixoto@gmail.comRecebido em 14-7-2022|Aprovado em 14-7-202211Artigo convidado。not to do tradutor: tradupal o autorizada pelo autor。简历是一份详尽的简历。一首诗,原创的意大利文,在这里呈现,没有Seminário diitto:故事,比较,实现
Comparative Legal History: uma combinação produtiva?
The text intends to discuss the limits and possibilities of Comparative legal history. Although it played an important informative role, the descriptive and na-tionalist legal comparison of the last century finds its limits today. The current Comparative legal history project takes on the new problems of spatial mapping of legal history beyond national histories. The new historical-comparative perspective must, therefore, attenuate the centralist perspective, which dimin-ishes the role of the peripheries and understands their history in terms of the center. Within the frame-work of a European history of public law, the methods are still being refined; cross-reads, improved and syn-chronized. The difficulties of this research project are many, imposed by chronologies, the different weights of political fractures, the question of borders and the difficult legacy of colonialism.Keywords:Comparative legal history; Research methodology in legal history; History of public law; Transnational aspects; European legal experience.*Professor Doutor Catedrático da Università degli Studi di Firenzi, Itália.bernardo.sordi@unifi.it**Doutor em Direito pela Universidade de Brasília. Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da UFERSA.Professor do IDP, Brasília.raphapeixoto@gmail.comRecebido em 14-7-2022|Aprovado em 14-7-202211Artigo convidado. Nota do tradutor:tradução autorizada pelo autor.Resumo e palavras-chaves elaboradaspelo tradutor.A versão original em italiano foi apresentada no Seminário Diritto: storia e comparazione,realizado